Please Draft Calvin Johnson
31 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
- Gibbs4Life
- Posts: 2363
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 2:45 pm
- Location: no
Please Draft Calvin Johnson
We have Moss and El...then it gets sketchy with lloyd...what makes us think brandon is a number two? Last year he had every opportunity and didn't produce. Calvin Johnson will strike fear into every team we face and with Santana opposite and
ey in the slot! Forget about it. Give JCam the perfect weapon Moss, Johnson, Lloyd, El,
ey! Defense is a need but the bottom line is the guys we already have on Dline need to just step up. At wideout however we are missing that guy, that possesion reciever who can also stretch the field. I suggest we trade #6 and next years 1st for Calvin Johnson. I just keep having the vision of us going down to dallas and lining up Calvin and Moss and it being lights out.
If CJ is an absolute no possibility... Laron Landry next to ST baby.


If CJ is an absolute no possibility... Laron Landry next to ST baby.
HAIL
- 1niksder
-
- Posts: 16754
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 1:45 pm
- Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Just resting their eyes....
Or maybe checking for pinholes in my eyelids... MODS NEVER SLEEP

Or maybe checking for pinholes in my eyelids... MODS NEVER SLEEP
..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-
When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....
If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-
When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....
If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
- Justice Hog
- Posts: 5801
- Joined: Tue Jun 10, 2003 7:38 pm
- Location: Newark, Delaware
Do you really think Johnson is gonna be available at #6? I certainly don't!
Fran Farren
"Justice Hog"
Newark, DE
“Do not be misled: Bad company corrupts good character.” 1 Corinthians 15:33
"Justice Hog"
Newark, DE
“Do not be misled: Bad company corrupts good character.” 1 Corinthians 15:33
- 1niksder
-
- Posts: 16754
- Joined: Sat Mar 27, 2004 1:45 pm
- Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
Justice Hog wrote:Do you really think Johnson is gonna be available at #6? I certainly don't!
I'm getting the feeling that he won't be avaiable at #2

..__..
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-
When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....
If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
{o,o}
|)__)
-"-"-
When you reach the end of your rope, tie a knot in it and hold on....
If the world didn't suck we'd all fall off
Yeah... we need five big receiving targets in a run-based offense.
NFL receivers would never, EVER complain if they didn't get the ball enough.
And you want to give up next year's number one to get him as well?
Are you My Cousin Vinny per chance?
Why don't we just trade Marcus Washington and Sean Taylor instead of giving up next year's pick... after all, if we had a 'can't miss' prospect like CJ, we wouldn't need defense.

NFL receivers would never, EVER complain if they didn't get the ball enough.
And you want to give up next year's number one to get him as well?
Are you My Cousin Vinny per chance?

Why don't we just trade Marcus Washington and Sean Taylor instead of giving up next year's pick... after all, if we had a 'can't miss' prospect like CJ, we wouldn't need defense.

Sean Taylor was one of a kind, may he rest in peace.
- UK Skins Fan
- Posts: 4592
- Joined: Wed Mar 02, 2005 3:11 pm
- Location: Somewhere, out there.
In other words, some of us say "please don't draft Calvin Johnson".
Unless...
Unless...
Also available on Twitter @UKSkinsFan
- Gibbs4Life
- Posts: 2363
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 2:45 pm
- Location: no
Yeah... we need five big receiving targets in a run-based offense
Saunders offense is run based? I guess I missed all those I-formations he had marshall faulk running out of...wait that's right OUR OFFENSE IS A PASSING OFFENSE. Only reason we still run is to set up big pass plays, gone are the days of 50 gut.
HAIL
- PulpExposure
- Posts: 4860
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 2:01 pm
Gibbs4Life wrote:Yeah... we need five big receiving targets in a run-based offense
Saunders offense is run based? I guess I missed all those I-formations he had marshall faulk running out of...wait that's right OUR OFFENSE IS A PASSING OFFENSE. Only reason we still run is to set up big pass plays, gone are the days of 50 gut.
Huh. Did you watch the Redskins play at all in the last 6 games of the year?
You're also referring to Mad Mike Martz' offense in St. Louis. When Saunders was the Offensive Coordinator for real, in KC, what do you remember?
Oh yeah, Priest Holmes and Larry Johnson running the ball. A lot.
- SkinsFreak
- Posts: 4730
- Joined: Tue Dec 27, 2005 7:31 am
- Location: Surfside
PulpExposure wrote:Huh. Did you watch the Redskins play at all in the last 6 games of the year?
In all fairness, the main reason why we were so "run heavy" the last six games of the year was because they didn't want to put too much pressure on Campbell; not yet having the time to gel with our receivers at that point. Gibbs said that in a press conference.
I think Saunders offense displays a nice balance of both the run and the pass.
- Gibbs4Life
- Posts: 2363
- Joined: Sun Sep 05, 2004 2:45 pm
- Location: no
In all fairness, the main reason why we were so "run heavy" the last six games of the year was because they didn't want to put too much pressure on Campbell; not yet having the time to gel with our receivers at that point. Gibbs said that in a press conference.
I think Saunders offense displays a nice balance of both the run and the pass.
Thank You Freak! Hey I want to run the ball just as much as anyone. Reality is CP had problems last year call it injury or whatever bottom line no production, then late in the year JCam was being limited somewhat but not this year. I'll bet we throw more td's than rush for them next season anyone wanna take that bet for the record?
HAIL
- PulpExposure
- Posts: 4860
- Joined: Tue Sep 06, 2005 2:01 pm
SkinsFreak wrote:In all fairness, the main reason why we were so "run heavy" the last six games of the year was because they didn't want to put too much pressure on Campbell; not yet having the time to gel with our receivers at that point. Gibbs said that in a press conference.
They also said they were getting back to "Redskins" football, which intimates a change of offensive philosophy more than purely to accomodate a young QB. Our team has 2 guys with 1000 yards rushing. We don't have even have 2 1000 yard receivers. It's easy to do the math with which we're more successful doing...
Gibbs4Life wrote:I'll bet we throw more td's than rush for them next season anyone wanna take that bet for the record?
I'll happily take that. But that's not a great measurement of run/pass. Run/pass playcall ratio is.
31 posts
• Page 1 of 3 • 1, 2, 3