Romo Is Not A Hall Of Famer Says Rick Gosselin

Talk about the AFC, NFC, the NFL Draft, College Football... anything football that has no Washington Redskin relevance.
Hog
User avatar
Posts: 2945
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 9:17 am
Location: A place way to HOT to handle

Re: Romo Is Not A Hall Of Famer Says Rick Gosselin

Postby TexasCowboy » Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:31 pm

someone get her a diaper change immediately
People don't like the truth because many times the truth takes them out of their comfort zone -
Jesse Ventura

Hog
User avatar
Posts: 1367
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 3:12 am
Location: Down the road on my Yamaha Majesty

Re: Romo Is Not A Hall Of Famer Says Rick Gosselin

Postby flamethrower » Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:47 pm

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error. You as a team stop thinking high of someone after pulling him in the first season after he plays less than 4 games, and don't win a single one. Epic Fail on this troll's claim that Stoudt was a winner as a starting quarterback in the NFL. Those 2 Super Bowl titles were won by Bradshaw. Who took every single snap in both games. When the troll admits that it made a mistake. I let this go. Or, Is Roethlessberger also Dr.Who. Or did he find some time dialation crystals?
Cowturd hater in the house.
Majesty rider in the house.
Cowturd troll owner here
Does Brokeback mountain mean anything to cowturd fanatics?

Hog
User avatar
Posts: 2945
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 9:17 am
Location: A place way to HOT to handle

Re: Romo Is Not A Hall Of Famer Says Rick Gosselin

Postby TexasCowboy » Mon Feb 27, 2017 5:48 pm

someone get her a diaper change immediately
People don't like the truth because many times the truth takes them out of their comfort zone -
Jesse Ventura

Hog
User avatar
Posts: 1367
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 3:12 am
Location: Down the road on my Yamaha Majesty

Re: Romo Is Not A Hall Of Famer Says Rick Gosselin

Postby flamethrower » Wed Mar 01, 2017 11:56 am

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error. You as a team stop thinking high of someone after pulling him in the first season after he plays less than 4 games, and don't win a single one. Epic Fail on this troll's claim that Stoudt was a winner as a starting quarterback in the NFL. Those 2 Super Bowl titles were won by Bradshaw. Who took every single snap in both games. When the troll admits that it made a mistake. I let this go. Or, Is Roethlessberger also Dr.Who. Or did he find some time dialation crystals?
Let me add 1 more point. Stoudt had a record of 0 wins and 4 losses in 3 years with the Cardinals. Would anyone with a brain call that a winning record. And his record as a Starter for the Steelers was 9 wins and 6 losses. The Steelers won 10 games that year. An injured Bradshaw came off the bench to beat the Jets in the last game ever played in New York City.
Cowturd hater in the house.
Majesty rider in the house.
Cowturd troll owner here
Does Brokeback mountain mean anything to cowturd fanatics?

Hog
User avatar
Posts: 2945
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 9:17 am
Location: A place way to HOT to handle

Re: Romo Is Not A Hall Of Famer Says Rick Gosselin

Postby TexasCowboy » Wed Mar 01, 2017 4:30 pm

Oh look attention whore is back to spam her usual garbage
get her a diaper change immediately
People don't like the truth because many times the truth takes them out of their comfort zone -
Jesse Ventura

Hog
User avatar
Posts: 1367
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 3:12 am
Location: Down the road on my Yamaha Majesty

Re: Romo Is Not A Hall Of Famer Says Rick Gosselin

Postby flamethrower » Wed Mar 01, 2017 4:33 pm

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error. You as a team stop thinking high of someone after pulling him in the first season after he plays less than 4 games, and don't win a single one. Epic Fail on this troll's claim that Stoudt was a winner as a starting quarterback in the NFL. Those 2 Super Bowl titles were won by Bradshaw. Who took every single snap in both games. When the troll admits that it made a mistake. I let this go. Or, Is Roethlessberger also Dr.Who. Or did he find some time dialation crystals?
Let me add 1 more point. Stoudt had a record of 0 wins and 4 losses in 3 years with the Cardinals. Would anyone with a brain call that a winning record. And his record as a Starter for the Steelers was 9 wins and 6 losses. The Steelers won 10 games that year. An injured Bradshaw came off the bench to beat the Jets in the last game ever played in New York City.
Cowturd hater in the house.
Majesty rider in the house.
Cowturd troll owner here
Does Brokeback mountain mean anything to cowturd fanatics?

Hog
User avatar
Posts: 2945
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 9:17 am
Location: A place way to HOT to handle

Re: Romo Is Not A Hall Of Famer Says Rick Gosselin

Postby TexasCowboy » Wed Mar 01, 2017 4:54 pm

diaper change immediately
People don't like the truth because many times the truth takes them out of their comfort zone -
Jesse Ventura

Hog
User avatar
Posts: 1367
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 3:12 am
Location: Down the road on my Yamaha Majesty

Re: Romo Is Not A Hall Of Famer Says Rick Gosselin

Postby flamethrower » Wed Mar 01, 2017 7:20 pm

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error. You as a team stop thinking high of someone after pulling him in the first season after he plays less than 4 games, and don't win a single one. Epic Fail on this troll's claim that Stoudt was a winner as a starting quarterback in the NFL. Those 2 Super Bowl titles were won by Bradshaw. Who took every single snap in both games. When the troll admits that it made a mistake. I let this go. Or, Is Roethlessberger also Dr.Who. Or did he find some time dialation crystals?
Let me add 1 more point. Stoudt had a record of 0 wins and 4 losses in 3 years with the Cardinals. Would anyone with a brain call that a winning record. And his record as a Starter for the Steelers was 9 wins and 6 losses. The Steelers won 10 games that year. An injured Bradshaw came off the bench to beat the Jets in the last game ever played in New York City.
Cowturd hater in the house.
Majesty rider in the house.
Cowturd troll owner here
Does Brokeback mountain mean anything to cowturd fanatics?

Hog
User avatar
Posts: 2945
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 9:17 am
Location: A place way to HOT to handle

Re: Romo Is Not A Hall Of Famer Says Rick Gosselin

Postby TexasCowboy » Thu Mar 02, 2017 7:07 am

diaper change immediately
People don't like the truth because many times the truth takes them out of their comfort zone -
Jesse Ventura

Hog
User avatar
Posts: 1367
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 3:12 am
Location: Down the road on my Yamaha Majesty

Re: Romo Is Not A Hall Of Famer Says Rick Gosselin

Postby flamethrower » Thu Mar 02, 2017 11:29 am

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error. You as a team stop thinking high of someone after pulling him in the first season after he plays less than 4 games, and don't win a single one. Epic Fail on this troll's claim that Stoudt was a winner as a starting quarterback in the NFL. Those 2 Super Bowl titles were won by Bradshaw. Who took every single snap in both games. When the troll admits that it made a mistake. I let this go. Or, Is Roethlessberger also Dr.Who. Or did he find some time dialation crystals?
Let me add 1 more point. Stoudt had a record of 0 wins and 4 losses in 3 years with the Cardinals. Would anyone with a brain call that a winning record. And his record as a Starter for the Steelers was 9 wins and 6 losses. The Steelers won 10 games that year. An injured Bradshaw came off the bench to beat the Jets in the last game ever played in New York City.
The troll just has to admit that Bradshaw, not Roethlessberger was the Steelers quarterback during Super Bowl 13, and 14. It does this. I stop reminding it of it's stupid comment about Roethlessberger being Stoudt's predecessor in Pittsburgh.
Cowturd hater in the house.
Majesty rider in the house.
Cowturd troll owner here
Does Brokeback mountain mean anything to cowturd fanatics?

Hog
User avatar
Posts: 2945
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 9:17 am
Location: A place way to HOT to handle

Re: Romo Is Not A Hall Of Famer Says Rick Gosselin

Postby TexasCowboy » Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:03 pm

diaper change immediately
People don't like the truth because many times the truth takes them out of their comfort zone -
Jesse Ventura

Hog
User avatar
Posts: 1367
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 3:12 am
Location: Down the road on my Yamaha Majesty

Re: Romo Is Not A Hall Of Famer Says Rick Gosselin

Postby flamethrower » Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:27 pm

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error. You as a team stop thinking high of someone after pulling him in the first season after he plays less than 4 games, and don't win a single one. Epic Fail on this troll's claim that Stoudt was a winner as a starting quarterback in the NFL. Those 2 Super Bowl titles were won by Bradshaw. Who took every single snap in both games. When the troll admits that it made a mistake. I let this go. Or, Is Roethlessberger also Dr.Who. Or did he find some time dialation crystals?
Let me add 1 more point. Stoudt had a record of 0 wins and 4 losses in 3 years with the Cardinals. Would anyone with a brain call that a winning record. And his record as a Starter for the Steelers was 9 wins and 6 losses. The Steelers won 10 games that year. An injured Bradshaw came off the bench to beat the Jets in the last game ever played in New York City.
The troll just has to admit that Bradshaw, not Roethlessberger was the Steelers quarterback during Super Bowl 13, and 14. It does this. I stop reminding it of it's stupid comment about Roethlessberger being Stoudt's predecessor in Pittsburgh.
Cowturd hater in the house.
Majesty rider in the house.
Cowturd troll owner here
Does Brokeback mountain mean anything to cowturd fanatics?

Hog
User avatar
Posts: 2945
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 9:17 am
Location: A place way to HOT to handle

Re: Romo Is Not A Hall Of Famer Says Rick Gosselin

Postby TexasCowboy » Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:33 pm

diaper change immediately
People don't like the truth because many times the truth takes them out of their comfort zone -
Jesse Ventura

Hog
User avatar
Posts: 1367
Joined: Thu May 04, 2006 3:12 am
Location: Down the road on my Yamaha Majesty

Re: Romo Is Not A Hall Of Famer Says Rick Gosselin

Postby flamethrower » Thu Mar 02, 2017 2:40 pm

TexasCowboy wrote:Notice how he can't answer the question cause he knows the answer is? there is
no place that validates his delusion, That Norv had to win 1 on his own, In order
to validate what he's clearly earned

so to answer his ignorant question

* Yes Stoudt is a winner by virtue of the fact he's won 2 rings, As Rothlisberger's
backup Stoudt, wasn't some clip board carrying tout barer, As this clown would like
to think he is. So here's a burning question and let's see if this time he can answer
the question instead of dodging it

* If the Cardinals didn't think highly of him, and didn't see him as a backup
with 2 rings, Then why would the Cardinals take a chance on him???

the answer awaits?

I'm quoting the trolls comment that I already commented on. That way if he tries to edit it. He won't be able to. The only editing I did was make the typo so large that you can't miss it. And if the Cardinals truly thought highly of Stoudt. He might have had more than 4 starts in 3 years. And, I'm gonna rewatch the Super Bowl 13, and Super Bowl 14 dvd just to make sure that it was Terry Bradshaw, and not Big Ben Roethlessberger playing in those 2 games.[/quote] After watching those 2 games. So sorry. But, Ben Roethesberger was not the Steelers quarterback in those 2 games. It would have been very tough seeing as how Ben had yet to be born at that time. LOL
Still waiting for the troll to admit that he was wrong about Cliff Stoudt backing up Ben Roethlessberger. That is the point of this. Until the troll admits that he was mistaken. I will continue to remind him of this gargantuan sized error. You as a team stop thinking high of someone after pulling him in the first season after he plays less than 4 games, and don't win a single one. Epic Fail on this troll's claim that Stoudt was a winner as a starting quarterback in the NFL. Those 2 Super Bowl titles were won by Bradshaw. Who took every single snap in both games. When the troll admits that it made a mistake. I let this go. Or, Is Roethlessberger also Dr.Who. Or did he find some time dialation crystals?
Let me add 1 more point. Stoudt had a record of 0 wins and 4 losses in 3 years with the Cardinals. Would anyone with a brain call that a winning record. And his record as a Starter for the Steelers was 9 wins and 6 losses. The Steelers won 10 games that year. An injured Bradshaw came off the bench to beat the Jets in the last game ever played in New York City.
The troll just has to admit that Bradshaw, not Roethlessberger was the Steelers quarterback during Super Bowl 13, and 14. It does this. I stop reminding it of it's stupid comment about Roethlessberger being Stoudt's predecessor in Pittsburgh.
Cowturd hater in the house.
Majesty rider in the house.
Cowturd troll owner here
Does Brokeback mountain mean anything to cowturd fanatics?

Hog
User avatar
Posts: 2945
Joined: Sun Nov 02, 2003 9:17 am
Location: A place way to HOT to handle

Re: Romo Is Not A Hall Of Famer Says Rick Gosselin

Postby TexasCowboy » Thu Mar 02, 2017 3:08 pm

Romo by the #'s

34,183 yards 248 touchdowns soon to be 37 potentially traded
to a team/franchise where he may/may not win a super bowl?
(to be continued) In the meantime for a mediocre QB who does
not need a lot of #'s to see the Hall down the road

if you are impressed with stats only

* Romo must be considered a potential 1st time entry or at least
with in the next 10/12 years as a Hall of Fame player
People don't like the truth because many times the truth takes them out of their comfort zone -
Jesse Ventura

Return to Around the League