| Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements. |
  |
|
| Author |
Message |
ATV
Hog
Joined: 05 Apr 2004
Posts: 965
Location: Algonquin, IL
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 14, 2005 11:10 pm Post subject: Tuck Rule |
 |
|
From the Post tonight:
"Pereira said it has been suggested to him that Plummer should have received an intentional-grounding penalty if the play indeed was an incomplete pass. But, according to Pereira, it wasn't intentional grounding because Plummer lost the ball inadvertently, not intentionally."
Did you hear that? So, if a quarterback is about to get sacked in between the tackles "box" and he doesn't want to get flagged for intional grounding, all he has to do is flub a pass and it won't be considered. Absolutely ridiculous logic. |
|
| Back to top |
|
welch
Skins History Buff
Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 4665
Location: New York, NY
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 28, 2005 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Incomprehensible. If Plummer "loses" control of the ball it's a tuck, and the ball is marked at the original line of scrimmage?
How does a QB ever fumble, given that rule? Grrrrrr |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
| |
|
|
