Jay Novacek picks the Redskins to..............
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
- redskincity
- Hog
-
- Posts: 3779
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 8:52 pm
- Location: The Heart
Jay Novacek picks the Redskins to..............
by redskincity » Wed Sep 10, 2003 8:38 pm
Jay Novacek picks the redskins to lose 
Jay Novacek:
Redskins (1-0) at Falcons (1-0)
It was important for Redskins coach Steve Spurrier to see his offense succeed against the Jets, even if it wasn't running up the score like he could in his Florida days.
The Falcons defense, however, is pretty good. Atlanta's front four and linebackers are good, and they did a good job confusing Dallas' line and offense. They need to continue to do that to make things easier for the offense until Michael Vick returns.
Looking at this matchup, the Falcons were successful last season, and they face a team that is inconsistent, the Redskins. You never know how Washington will fare.
Because of what the Falcons have done last season and this year, they have an advantage. They are familiar with each other, they're a cohesive unit, and it will be tougher for the Redskins to get back up mentally. It?s not the individual Washington players as much as the team, which will have trouble staying consistent.
Pick: Falcons.
Jay Novacek:
Redskins (1-0) at Falcons (1-0)
It was important for Redskins coach Steve Spurrier to see his offense succeed against the Jets, even if it wasn't running up the score like he could in his Florida days.
The Falcons defense, however, is pretty good. Atlanta's front four and linebackers are good, and they did a good job confusing Dallas' line and offense. They need to continue to do that to make things easier for the offense until Michael Vick returns.
Looking at this matchup, the Falcons were successful last season, and they face a team that is inconsistent, the Redskins. You never know how Washington will fare.
Because of what the Falcons have done last season and this year, they have an advantage. They are familiar with each other, they're a cohesive unit, and it will be tougher for the Redskins to get back up mentally. It?s not the individual Washington players as much as the team, which will have trouble staying consistent.
Pick: Falcons.
• NFL Championships
1937, 1942, 1983, 1987, 1991
• Conference Championships
1936, 1937, 1940, 1942, 1943, 1945, 1972, 1982, 1983, 1987, 1991
• Division Championships
1972, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1987, 1991, 1999,
• All-Time Record:
515-465-27
1937, 1942, 1983, 1987, 1991
• Conference Championships
1936, 1937, 1940, 1942, 1943, 1945, 1972, 1982, 1983, 1987, 1991
• Division Championships
1972, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1987, 1991, 1999,
• All-Time Record:
515-465-27
by BossHog » Wed Sep 10, 2003 10:02 pm
What a load of crap. Well what do you expect from a Cowpuke?
Not a single comment baed on football itself, just his 'philosophical views' on the importance of a 'consistent' effort.
... drivel.
Thanks for posting that... I can't believe some of this garbage gets published... so much for the benefit of an 'educated' reporter. Might as well just check the stats and file the game... what is the point in even playing?
I love the fact that the whole basis for his argument is consistency and I guess we just haven't showed any consistency in our ONE GAME. Or does jay think teams are the same from one year to the next? That's an educated view of football in the days of free agency and salary caps.
What an idiot.
Trivia: How do you know an article was written by a fervent Redskin hater?
When the only name mentioned in a head to head match-up article is Steve Spurrier.
No mention of a guy named Michael Vick either.
I'm glad our exclusive content is considerably better than this mindless psychobabble. Somebody shoot me if i ever write such an uninformed article... please.
Not a single comment baed on football itself, just his 'philosophical views' on the importance of a 'consistent' effort.
... drivel.
Thanks for posting that... I can't believe some of this garbage gets published... so much for the benefit of an 'educated' reporter. Might as well just check the stats and file the game... what is the point in even playing?
I love the fact that the whole basis for his argument is consistency and I guess we just haven't showed any consistency in our ONE GAME. Or does jay think teams are the same from one year to the next? That's an educated view of football in the days of free agency and salary caps.
What an idiot.
Trivia: How do you know an article was written by a fervent Redskin hater?
When the only name mentioned in a head to head match-up article is Steve Spurrier.
No mention of a guy named Michael Vick either.
I'm glad our exclusive content is considerably better than this mindless psychobabble. Somebody shoot me if i ever write such an uninformed article... please.
Sean Taylor was one of a kind, may he rest in peace.
- skinsfaninroanoke
- Posts: 3476
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:43 am
- Location: Roanoke, VA (The sw VA heart of the Skins)
by skinsfaninroanoke » Thu Sep 11, 2003 11:09 am
Reporting - hah!
And this guy supposedly went to college to write crap like that?
I write better articles at 2 in the morning drunk with our victory over the Jets than that puke.
Nothing really of substance, that is for sure. I can't believe that people like him get jobs the staff on here would kill for, just to write smarmy little articles based on nothing. No facts, no stats, no nothing. Did you notice that the fool actually wrote that Atlanta's front four were pretty good? Does the idiot remember that they primarily (90% or more of the time) run the 3-4 defense?
What a goof.
And this guy supposedly went to college to write crap like that?
I write better articles at 2 in the morning drunk with our victory over the Jets than that puke.
Nothing really of substance, that is for sure. I can't believe that people like him get jobs the staff on here would kill for, just to write smarmy little articles based on nothing. No facts, no stats, no nothing. Did you notice that the fool actually wrote that Atlanta's front four were pretty good? Does the idiot remember that they primarily (90% or more of the time) run the 3-4 defense?
What a goof.
Rich in Roanoke
_______________________________________
Let others hail the rising sun:
I bow to that whose course is run
_______________________________________
Let others hail the rising sun:
I bow to that whose course is run
by BossHog » Thu Sep 11, 2003 11:37 am
Did you notice that the fool actually wrote that Atlanta's front four were pretty good?
I can't believe i forgot to mention that... that's what really started my blood boiling in the first place... just totally uninformed drivel.
I got something for ya Jay...
Sean Taylor was one of a kind, may he rest in peace.
- skinsfaninroanoke
- Posts: 3476
- Joined: Mon Aug 18, 2003 12:43 am
- Location: Roanoke, VA (The sw VA heart of the Skins)
by skinsfaninroanoke » Thu Sep 11, 2003 12:32 pm
Yo redskincity - where did you find that crap at? I want to see if they have a link to email mr. Jay "my brain is on novacaine" Novacek.
What in the @#$% are these places thinking not having a Skin write Skin articles? A friggin cowpuke?????
What in the @#$% are these places thinking not having a Skin write Skin articles? A friggin cowpuke?????
Rich in Roanoke
_______________________________________
Let others hail the rising sun:
I bow to that whose course is run
_______________________________________
Let others hail the rising sun:
I bow to that whose course is run
- hailskins666
-
- Posts: 6481
- Joined: Thu Aug 07, 2003 8:01 am
- Location: South of Heaven, trying to hit a toilet on shrooms
by hailskins666 » Thu Sep 11, 2003 1:54 pm
boss wrote:
true dat boss, shows how smart jay is being atl runs a 3-4
Quote:
Did you notice that the fool actually wrote that Atlanta's front four were pretty good?
I can't believe i forgot to mention that... that's what really started my blood boiling in the first place... just totally uninformed drivel.
I got something for ya Jay...
_________________
BossHog
true dat boss, shows how smart jay is being atl runs a 3-4
THN's resident jerk.
Glock .40 Model 22 - First* line of home defense.... 'ADT' is for liberals.
Glock .40 Model 22 - First* line of home defense.... 'ADT' is for liberals.
- redskincity
- Hog
-
- Posts: 3779
- Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 8:52 pm
- Location: The Heart
by redskincity » Thu Sep 11, 2003 2:36 pm
I sure do!!! He is at http://msnbc.com/news/nfl_front.asp?0dm=s10Ms Its funny I think he is pissed at us because last year he picked us to win alot and we didn't. He was pissed in a article on why we didnt run on 3rd and 1 with Davis. 
The link to his crap though is
http://msnbc.com/modules/interactive.as ... &navid=NFL
The link to his crap though is
http://msnbc.com/modules/interactive.as ... &navid=NFL
• NFL Championships
1937, 1942, 1983, 1987, 1991
• Conference Championships
1936, 1937, 1940, 1942, 1943, 1945, 1972, 1982, 1983, 1987, 1991
• Division Championships
1972, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1987, 1991, 1999,
• All-Time Record:
515-465-27
1937, 1942, 1983, 1987, 1991
• Conference Championships
1936, 1937, 1940, 1942, 1943, 1945, 1972, 1982, 1983, 1987, 1991
• Division Championships
1972, 1982, 1983, 1984, 1987, 1991, 1999,
• All-Time Record:
515-465-27
9 posts
• Page 1 of 1
Return to Washington Redskins Game Day - 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006