Washington Redskins Message Board
Visit the THN Website 
Washington Redskins Fan Forum spacer Washington Redskins Message Board
Home Login Register Rules FAQ Photo Galleries Sat May 18, 2013 7:09 pm
Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements.
   TheHogs.net Forum Index » Washington Redskins Game Day - 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006

 » Post game discussion

All times are GMT - 5 Hours 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  
Author Message
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky


Joined: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 4884
Location: Surfside

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 10:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
Irn-Bru wrote:

Based on the coaches decisions, history, and the way that I see things right now. . .which is about all we have to go on as fans (each with their perspective on how they see things). IF Jason gave us a better chance to win on any particular week, in the coaches eyes, we'd have seen him by now. I also don't think his first start is too far off.

You have to remember that "ready" is word that is here relative to everything else around him. Campbell doesn't seem "ready" to play in my eyes. However, in another sense of the word, Campbell is "ready" to play--or at least we'd better hope that he is!--and I feel good about his ability to step in and begin learning the ropes.

It's just that sometimes, when QBs are "ready" to play, that doesn't mean that they give a team the best chance to win. So that's what I meant originally, when I used the term "ready" in the former (relative) sense, not the latter.


Where do you believe he isnt ready?

I honestly, can't see where he could be any worse at this point in the season. Brunell made rookie mistakes left and right. And IMO the team doesn't even allow Brunell to use his veteran skillset. He can't call audibles, he can't choose plays... He basically runs the play dictated to him and he's no longer able to execute when given time. Its just a fact.


Chris, I totally agree with you. Right on.
Back to top
hrp
newbie


Joined: 19 Oct 2006
Posts: 1
Location: Edmonton, Alberta,Canada

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:01 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This team has no coaching. They show up every week unprepared. (The short swing pass hasn't worked in weeks , stop using it. )
Running on 3rd and 20+ is genius? The defense shoul;d at least pretend to cover pass receivers.
Coaching a previously successful scheme is myopic. You need to coach personnel. Fit schemes to players not players to schemes.
Back to top
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14695
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:04 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

When the INT went back for the TD, Gibbs should have pulled Brunell, just to change things up. And someone needs to tell Carlos Rogers that when the other team only needs two yards for a first down, he shouldn't be giving a 10 yard cushion to the receiver. He was so determined not to get beat deep, that he gave up the first down all day long.
Back to top
SkinzCanes
Hog


Joined: 25 Oct 2004
Posts: 1513

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 11:56 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:
And yes, Brunell isn't the only issue, by a longshot. But Gibbs' decision to stick with him is perhaps emblematic of a refusal to learn and adapt to what's required to be successful these days. It's literally 2004 all over again.


Agree 100%. It's the same mistakes over and over again.
Back to top
REDEEMEDSKIN
~~
~~


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 8526
Location: Northern Virginia

Posted: Mon Nov 13, 2006 12:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

John Manfreda wrote:
Czaban should [have] directed that question at Gibbs.


Czabe would NEVER have the stones to do that, regardelss of what he might say on radio or in a tv studio, behind Joe's back.

I wonder how Czabe would react if someone were to ask him the same questions after one of his idiotic shows.

Czabe, will you be on FOX next season?

If your show continues to stink, would you go up to FOX and ask them to replace you???

Please. Real class, czabe. Rolling Eyes
Back to top
Link
Kobo has over 2 million ebooks to choose from!
John Manfreda
Hog


Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Posts: 2094
Location: none

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:09 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

REDEEMEDSKIN wrote:
John Manfreda wrote:
Czaban should [have] directed that question at Gibbs.


Czabe would NEVER have the stones to do that, regardelss of what he might say on radio or in a tv studio, behind Joe's back.

I wonder how Czabe would react if someone were to ask him the same questions after one of his idiotic shows.

Czabe, will you be on FOX next season?

If your show continues to stink, would you go up to FOX and ask them to replace you???

Please. Real class, czabe. Rolling Eyes

I have to agree with you on that one.
Back to top
JansenFan
and Jackson
and Jackson


Joined: 20 Aug 2003
Posts: 8909
Location: Charles Town, WV

Posted: Wed Nov 15, 2006 10:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Actually, two years ago, the Joe Gibbs show was hosted by Czabe and Pollin, and something happened that forced 980 to make Bram the host. Not sure what happened, but the pair eluded to something Czabe asked him or said, but I don't recall what it was.
Back to top
Page 6 of 6All times are GMT - 5 Hours
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  



Home Login Register FAQ Search Photo Galleries Wireless Version
Copyright © 2000-2009 www.thehogs.net ( THN ). All Rights Reserved.Powered by php BB