| Author |
Message |
jazzskins Hog
Joined: 12 Feb 2007 Posts: 483
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 1:06 pm Post subject: In Motion Plays |
|
|
I haven't figured out yet why on some plays a player can go in motion and the QB can snap the ball while the player is running. On other plays the player has to be set or there is a penalty.
Why is that? I'm sure its something simple that I just haven't taken into account.
Chad |
|
| Back to top |
|
GSPODS Hog
Joined: 03 Sep 2007 Posts: 4983
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
NFL rules state only one player can be in motion at the snap, and that one player must be moving parallel to the line of scrimmage. If the player turns to face "upfield", the player must come to a set position for one full second before the snap.
You can find the actual rules here:
http:/www.nfl.com/rules
But who can understand half of that nonsense? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Fios The Evil Straw

Joined: 12 Jan 2004 Posts: 8219 Location: Leather Chair
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 2:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GSPODS wrote: | NFL rules state only one player can be in motion at the snap, and that one player must be moving parallel to the line of scrimmage. If the player turns to face "upfield", the player must come to a set position for one full second before the snap.
You can find the actual rules here:
http:/www.nfl.com/rules
But who can understand half of that nonsense? |
Certainly not the refs |
|
| Back to top |
|
GSPODS Hog
Joined: 03 Sep 2007 Posts: 4983
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 2:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fios wrote: | | GSPODS wrote: | NFL rules state only one player can be in motion at the snap, and that one player must be moving parallel to the line of scrimmage. If the player turns to face "upfield", the player must come to a set position for one full second before the snap.
You can find the actual rules here:
http:/www.nfl.com/rules
But who can understand half of that nonsense? |
Certainly not the refs |
Obviously. Has anyone seen New England's "multiple linebackers in motion at the goal line" formation? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins JSPB22

Joined: 02 Jul 2004 Posts: 14756 Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| GSPODS wrote: | | Fios wrote: | | GSPODS wrote: | NFL rules state only one player can be in motion at the snap, and that one player must be moving parallel to the line of scrimmage. If the player turns to face "upfield", the player must come to a set position for one full second before the snap.
You can find the actual rules here:
http:/www.nfl.com/rules
But who can understand half of that nonsense? |
Certainly not the refs |
Obviously. Has anyone seen New England's "multiple linebackers in motion at the goal line" formation? |
Linebackers? Defenders don't have to be set before the play. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
  |
GSPODS Hog
Joined: 03 Sep 2007 Posts: 4983
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 20, 2007 5:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| JSPB22 wrote: | | GSPODS wrote: | | Fios wrote: | | GSPODS wrote: | NFL rules state only one player can be in motion at the snap, and that one player must be moving parallel to the line of scrimmage. If the player turns to face "upfield", the player must come to a set position for one full second before the snap.
You can find the actual rules here:
http:/www.nfl.com/rules
But who can understand half of that nonsense? |
Certainly not the refs |
Obviously. Has anyone seen New England's "multiple linebackers in motion at the goal line" formation? |
Linebackers? Defenders don't have to be set before the play. |
New England uses two linebackers on most of their offensive goal line snaps, Vrabel and one other linebacker that changes every down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
welch Skins History Buff

Joined: 10 Jan 2004 Posts: 4671 Location: New York, NY
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 22, 2007 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
...and, I believe, the OL has to be set for (a full second?). The intention is that a back -- and originally there were always four players in the "backfield" -- could run parallel to the LOS, but only one at a time, and never moving toward the line. Of course, that's different in the CFL.
One of Joe G's distinctive traits has always been that he has players go in motion every which way...one after the other. Relatively few plays, so the team can practice and run them to perfection, but run from infinite formations.
In fact, I recently re-watched the game tape SB 22 and I'm pretty sure that one of the long TD passes came after the OL did a double pull, just like the beginning of counter-trey. Difference was that Timmy Smith dove into the line while Doug Williams stepped back with the ball, and then hit Sanders (or Clark?) with a long TD. |
|
| Back to top |
|
VetSkinsFan One Step Away

Joined: 19 Jul 2007 Posts: 7779 Location: NoVA
|
| Posted: Wed Feb 06, 2008 3:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Also, if there's multiple people in 'motion' it's called a 'shift' and they they have to 'set' before the play kicks off or it's illegal motion/shift. |
|
| Back to top |
|
butzadams piglet
Joined: 14 Jul 2009 Posts: 39
|
| Posted: Tue Jul 14, 2009 10:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
Redskins THEORY behind SHIFTS, & MOTIONS:
ON “MOVEMENT”
MOVEMENT IS VERY IMPORTANT TO OUR TOTAL OFFENSIVE SYSTEM.
THERE ARE SEVERAL REASONS FOR MOVEMENT IN OUR OFFENSE; AMONG
THE MOST PROMINENT REASONS ARE:
1. To create a personnel advantage by creating mis-matches on our Receivers or Backs.
2. To create a personnel advantage by effecting changes in run support and force responsibilities.
3. To create secondary movement in an effort to better enable our Quarterback to recognize coverage.
4. To get our personnel in better position to execute their given assignment.
5. To create problems for the defense in Man under coverages when attempting to hold or bump Receivers at the line of scrimmage.
6. To create an opportunity for indecision, confusion, and/or mis-alignment by the secondary.
7. To cause movement on the part of the Defense in an effort to realign their personnel with the coverage calls and changes and not allow them to set themselves and react to familiar offensive patterns. Make the Defense “play on the move”.
8. To force opponents to spend practice time and effort on adjusting to movement patterns rather than improving defensive skills and schemes.
9. To create a visual complexity to the defense, yet be able to run the same basic plays from a variety of looks.
PS: Zorn is not as big on this as Joe Gibbs was. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Page 1 of 1 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |