Cam Newton Highlights and what is your impression of him
20 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2
- crazyhorse1
- Posts: 3634
- Joined: Mon Mar 21, 2005 8:01 pm
- Location: virginia beach
by crazyhorse1 » Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:40 pm
Newton's more a Tebrow type of runner than a Vick, which means his running won't matter very much in the pro's; however, I think he's a much better passer than given credit for here. I think he has the potential to develop into a first class QB and think we should take a chance on him. I would grab him at 10 and be happy about it.Countertrey wrote:mmmmmmmdunno... I'm a bit skittish about...
Auburn Quarterbacks....
There's nobody out there who's both better and probably available.
- SkinsJock
- Posts: 17568
- Joined: Tue Feb 24, 2004 9:23 pm
- Location: IF you're lucky enough to live in Newport, RI, you're lucky enough
by SkinsJock » Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:03 pm
crazyhorse1 wrote:Newton's more a Tebrow type of runner than a Vick, which means his running won't matter very much in the pro's; however, I think he's a much better passer than given credit for here. I think he has the potential to develop into a first class QB and think we should take a chance on him. I would grab him at 10 and be happy about it.Countertrey wrote:mmmmmmmdunno... I'm a bit skittish about...
Auburn Quarterbacks....
There's nobody out there who's both better and probably available.
that's good enough for me - IF CH1 thinks he's any good, that's the "kiss of death"' - DO NOT DRAFT this guy
until Dan Snyder lets NFL people make ALL the decisions on who coaches & plays, we will be a mediocre franchise
each season starts with high hopes & expectations - & ends with us knowing we should have done better with who we have
by brad7686 » Sun Jan 23, 2011 12:39 pm
crazyhorse1 wrote:Newton's more a Tebrow type of runner than a Vick, which means his running won't matter very much in the pro's; however, I think he's a much better passer than given credit for here. I think he has the potential to develop into a first class QB and think we should take a chance on him. I would grab him at 10 and be happy about it.Countertrey wrote:mmmmmmmdunno... I'm a bit skittish about...
Auburn Quarterbacks....
There's nobody out there who's both better and probably available.
I don't know, Tebow was racking up a lot of yards running the ball this year. Newton would definitely pick up a lot on the ground.
- VetSkinsFan
- Posts: 7652
- Joined: Thu Jul 19, 2007 8:31 am
- Location: NoVA
by VetSkinsFan » Mon Jan 24, 2011 9:21 am
If I were game planning for a game vs Denver, you can bet your last dollar that I'd have a spy on Tebow. He may not run a 4.2 40, but will burn you if you're not careful.
...any given Sunday....
RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!
GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
RIP #21 Sean Taylor. You will be loved and adored by Redskins fans forever!!!!!
GSPODS:
The National Anthem sucks.
What a useless piece of propagandist rhetoric that is.
- The Hogster
- Posts: 7225
- Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 9:13 pm
- Location: Washington D.C.
by The Hogster » Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:17 pm
Just say no to Cam. I'm not overly impressed with him. He's a dominant athlete, but I can't say that he's shown that he's a great Quarterback.
His physical skills are so superior to the collegiate kids, that it's hard to tell how good he can be when he cannot rely on that advantage (i.e. in the NFL).
I think Jake Locker or Ryan Mallet would suit our offense well.
His physical skills are so superior to the collegiate kids, that it's hard to tell how good he can be when he cannot rely on that advantage (i.e. in the NFL).
I think Jake Locker or Ryan Mallet would suit our offense well.
SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
___________________________
20 posts
• Page 2 of 2 • 1, 2