revisiting the trade with the Rams

Talk about the Washington Redskins here. Do you bleed burgundy and gold?
Posts: 6538
Joined: Thu Jul 29, 2010 2:56 pm
Location: 505 New Mexico repn

Postby cowboykillerzRGiii » Fri Aug 17, 2012 8:55 pm

Skinny? Like the leading passer for a single season ever?
#21 forever in our hearts
“I wanted to just… put his lights out ….because, you know, …Dallas sucks…” - Dexter Manley

User avatar
Posts: 4609
Joined: Sat Aug 16, 2008 6:31 pm
Location: D.C.

Postby Red_One43 » Fri Aug 17, 2012 9:19 pm

In response to Skeletor's questions, thought it would be fun to look back on what was being said. Note: The price that Todd McShay initially came up with - wasn't even close.

Todd McShay, ESPN:
I think it was somewhere in the ballpark of a second and fourth, if I remember correctly. But I also think that the trade value chart, while helpful, it’s – first of all, it’s never exact.

DarthMonk, I am sure that you will note that McShay recognizes that the two first round picks are exchanged (6th for 2nd), so the total number of picks given to the Rams is only two. :)

There were a lot of threads where the topic of RGIII came up - I am not sure which thread Skeletor was talking about, but I chose these four.

Exhibit A - has a poll that give some insight, but this thread didn't have much participation.

Exhibit 1A - by its title generated a lot of participation.

Exhibit B - Provides us with the McShay quote and discussion.

Exhibit C - I believe was the first to open up the debate

Trade Up for RGIII Debate Exhibit A

Why We Wont Draft a QB in Rounds 1 or 2 (Exhibit 1B)

Trade Up for RGIII debate Exhibit B

No What? Exhibit C

Return to Hog Wash - Washington Redskins Football