| Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements. |
| Author |
Message |
Red_One43
Hog
Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 4606
Location: D.C.
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 11:32 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | Red_One43 wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | Then why give him an extension? Not saying it isn't true, just trying to understand. |
Trying to understand Shanny and the Danny are next to impossible, because they way they think in some ways is out of this world.
Think back to the McNabb contract extension.
McNabb is under fire and they extend his contract with one that they can easily get out from underneath. Why renew it in the first place? Did a phony vote of confidence really help anyone?
Without the details of Haz's and Smith's contracts, we have no idea what it means. |
Coaches contracts don't count under the salary cap, so McNabb's extension and Hazlet's wouldn't be for the same reasons. |
| Quote: | | Jim Haslett will stay the season ... His contract “extension” allows the skins to dump him after the season for no extra money owed(that should have been a red flag for Jim, but oh well). |
This came from Hailredkins.com. Don't know how credible the guy is, but I read his newsletters that he sends.
http://www.hailredskins.com/?p=1006 |
|
| Back to top |
|
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 10627
Location: on the bandwagon
|
| Posted: Tue Oct 30, 2012 11:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Red_One43 wrote: | | Quote: | | Jim Haslett will stay the season ... His contract “extension” allows the skins to dump him after the season for no extra money owed(that should have been a red flag for Jim, but oh well). |
This came from Hailredkins.com. Don't know how credible the guy is, but I read his newsletters that he sends.
http://www.hailredskins.com/?p=1006 |
Do they know what Haslett (and/or his agent) thought about the contract? Why the "should have"? It's possible he wasn't happy with it but decided to sign anyway as right now this is undoubtedly his best option. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Page 6 of 6 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
|
