Luck?

by **riggofan** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:00 pm

I've been impressed with Andrew Luck the couple times I've seen him play. I think there is probably an argument to be made that the Redskins have more offensive talent around RGIII than Luck has. But I think you can also argue that Luck has played a lot more like a rookie this year, even if he is a very talented rookie.

by **Deadskins** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:11 pm

Andrew Lucks sings his Christmas song.

by **funsho2** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:37 pm

PAPDOG67 wrote:Not taking anything away from Luck, but the Colts have had one of the easiest schedules in the history of the NFL this year. Their opponents comined winning % this season to date .423.

If the redskins had the colts schedule .....we will be talking about a first round bye for the skins

by **DarthMonk** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:38 pm

Deadskins wrote:Andrew Lucks sings his Christmas song.

I own this LP.

by **PAPDOG67** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:40 pm

funsho2 wrote:
PAPDOG67 wrote:Not taking anything away from Luck, but the Colts have had one of the easiest schedules in the history of the NFL this year. Their opponents comined winning % this season to date .423.

If the redskins had the colts schedule .....we will be talking about a first round bye for the skins

You're probably right. The AFC as a whole is terrible. There are a lot of horrendous teams in the AFC.

by **SkinsJock** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 3:50 pm

Andrew Luck came into the NFL better prepared and with a better supporting cast

I'm biased towards Robert Griffin III

and

no matter what awards are given out, I could care less

I do NOT think there's a better QB for the Redskins playing in the NFL right now

by **DarthMonk** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:13 pm

Deadskins wrote:Andrew Lucks sings his Christmas song.

Gr III f's:

^ Link

by **Deadskins** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 4:18 pm

DarthMonk wrote:
Deadskins wrote:Andrew Lucks sings his Christmas song.

Gr III f's:

^ Link

I preferthis version of Candyman

by **Bob 0119** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 9:32 pm

riggofan wrote:I've been impressed with Andrew Luck the couple times I've seen him play. I think there is probably an argument to be made that the Redskins have more offensive talent around RGIII than Luck has. But I think you can also argue that Luck has played a lot more like a rookie this year, even if he is a very talented rookie.

Is it that Griffin has the better supporting cast, or that Griffin makes his supporting cast better?

by **emoses14** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 10:36 pm

Bob 0119 wrote:
riggofan wrote:I've been impressed with Andrew Luck the couple times I've seen him play. I think there is probably an argument to be made that the Redskins have more offensive talent around RGIII than Luck has. But I think you can also argue that Luck has played a lot more like a rookie this year, even if he is a very talented rookie.

Is it that Griffin has the better supporting cast, or that Griffin makes his supporting cast better?

by **riggofan** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 10:41 pm

emoses14 wrote:
Bob 0119 wrote:
riggofan wrote:I've been impressed with Andrew Luck the couple times I've seen him play. I think there is probably an argument to be made that the Redskins have more offensive talent around RGIII than Luck has. But I think you can also argue that Luck has played a lot more like a rookie this year, even if he is a very talented rookie.

Is it that Griffin has the better supporting cast, or that Griffin makes his supporting cast better?

Probably a little bit of both. I don't think Luck has the WRs or the RB that RGIII does, do you?

by **crazyhorse1** » Wed Dec 26, 2012 11:37 pm

riggofan wrote:
emoses14 wrote:
Bob 0119 wrote:
riggofan wrote:I've been impressed with Andrew Luck the couple times I've seen him play. I think there is probably an argument to be made that the Redskins have more offensive talent around RGIII than Luck has. But I think you can also argue that Luck has played a lot more like a rookie this year, even if he is a very talented rookie.

Is it that Griffin has the better supporting cast, or that Griffin makes his supporting cast better?

Probably a little bit of both. I don't think Luck has the WRs or the RB that RGIII does, do you?

If Luck had a good running back the Colts wouldn't be passing every down and we wouldn't be hearing so much of Luck. Comparing him with RG3 is absurd. You simply don't compare a quarterback with a 104 Rat with a quarterback with a 75 RAT, especially when the former quarterback is probably the best running quarterback in history and setting rushing records as well as passing records.

by **emoses14** » Thu Dec 27, 2012 7:52 am

crazyhorse1 wrote:
riggofan wrote:
emoses14 wrote:
Bob 0119 wrote:
riggofan wrote:I've been impressed with Andrew Luck the couple times I've seen him play. I think there is probably an argument to be made that the Redskins have more offensive talent around RGIII than Luck has. But I think you can also argue that Luck has played a lot more like a rookie this year, even if he is a very talented rookie.

Is it that Griffin has the better supporting cast, or that Griffin makes his supporting cast better?

Probably a little bit of both. I don't think Luck has the WRs or the RB that RGIII does, do you?

If Luck had a good running back the Colts wouldn't be passing every down and we wouldn't be hearing so much of Luck. Comparing him with RG3 is absurd. You simply don't compare a quarterback with a 104 Rat with a quarterback with a 75 RAT, especially when the former quarterback is probably the best running quarterback in history and setting rushing records as well as passing records.

Crazy horse speakum the truth. I'm not offended by the comparison, but it really doesn't make sense to me. The rookie qb having the best season is griffin.

by **Bob 0119** » Thu Dec 27, 2012 8:41 am

riggofan wrote:
emoses14 wrote:
Bob 0119 wrote:
riggofan wrote:I've been impressed with Andrew Luck the couple times I've seen him play. I think there is probably an argument to be made that the Redskins have more offensive talent around RGIII than Luck has. But I think you can also argue that Luck has played a lot more like a rookie this year, even if he is a very talented rookie.

Is it that Griffin has the better supporting cast, or that Griffin makes his supporting cast better?

Probably a little bit of both. I don't think Luck has the WRs or the RB that RGIII does, do you?

I think if teams were more afraid of Andrew Luck, they'd have a better running game. Since teams have to worry about not just Morris running but also Griffin it opens up the passing game especially with how effectively Griffin sells play-action.

by **riggofan** » Thu Dec 27, 2012 9:12 am

I'm sure that's true. But I swear during the draft all we heard was that people underestimated what an athlete Luck was, and he was supposed to be nearly as mobile as RGIII.

Also I was going to add that we heard a lot this season about how Morris looked a lot better because of RGIII. Didn't the Browns game kind of squash that argument? Morris looked pretty damn good with Cousins under center.