Washington Redskins Message Board
Visit the THN Website 
Washington Redskins Fan Forum spacer Washington Redskins Message Board
Home Login Register Rules FAQ Photo Galleries Mon May 20, 2013 7:31 am
Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements.
   TheHogs.net Forum Index » Hog Wash - Washington Redskins Football

 » Seattle @ Washington preview analyses

All times are GMT - 5 Hours 
Post new topic   Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next  
Author Message
The Hogster
#######
#######


Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 6999
Location: Washington D.C.

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

In addition to predicting us to win the next two games, I'm pulling for Minnesota to pull off a repeat upset of Green Bay. That would send us to San Fran next week. And, send MIN to ATL.

Not that we can be picky, but I'd rather have the potential to play the NFC Championship game at HOME. Facing Minnesota would do just that.
Back to top
skinsfan#33
#33
#33


Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 3875

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hogster wrote:
In addition to predicting us to win the next two games, I'm pulling for Minnesota to pull off a repeat upset of Green Bay. That would send us to San Fran next week. And, send MIN to ATL.

Not that we can be picky, but I'd rather have the potential to play the NFC Championship game at HOME. Facing Minnesota would do just that.

Funny I was just taking to a Vikings fan about that exact scenario.
Back to top
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ


Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11506
Location: New England

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

IF we could play San Francisco, I'd prefer it be the NFC Championship game Twisted Evil
Back to top
The Hogster
#######
#######


Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 6999
Location: Washington D.C.

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SkinsJock wrote:
IF we could play San Francisco, I'd prefer it be the NFC Championship game Twisted Evil


So you'd rather play San Fran on the road, than MIN at home. Shocked

Got it.

Can't say this surprises me.
Back to top
emoses14
Hog


Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 1504
Location: Atlanta, GA

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hogster wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:
IF we could play San Francisco, I'd prefer it be the NFC Championship game Twisted Evil


So you'd rather play San Fran on the road, than MIN at home. Shocked

Got it.

Can't say this surprises me.


I'm selfish. I'd rather Green Bay win so that the Skins travel to Atlanta so I can go see them next weekend.
Back to top
Link
233437_Brand Focus
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14698
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 1:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

emoses14 wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:
IF we could play San Francisco, I'd prefer it be the NFC Championship game Twisted Evil


So you'd rather play San Fran on the road, than MIN at home. Shocked

Got it.

Can't say this surprises me.


I'm selfish. I'd rather Green Bay win so that the Skins travel to Atlanta so I can go see them next weekend.

That's a tough call, but I think we can win anywhere, so I'm with you emoses.
Back to top
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ


Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11506
Location: New England

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 4:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

It's really simple for me ... unlike many others here I don't want to be considered 'lucky' to win a Super Bowl Twisted Evil

I hope we play Atlanta next week and then whomever is the best team left in the NFC ...

we are playing well enough to win the NFC Championship against any team

I don't need no stinking upsets so the Redskins can play an 'easy' game


In the NFC - I have the 49ers at 1 and the Falcons as 2 - both are playing really well right now - I rate the Seahawks a little behind those 2 ....

I want the Seahawks, then the Falcons and then the 49ers ...

that's how it should be - not some pansy, 'easy' game to get into the Super Bowl

go ahead - be a pansy - hope for the vikings to win 2 in a row ...

Twisted Evil
Back to top
The Hogster
#######
#######


Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 6999
Location: Washington D.C.

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SkinsJock wrote:
It's really simple for me ... unlike many others here I don't want to be considered 'lucky' to win a Super Bowl Twisted Evil

I hope we play Atlanta next week and then whomever is the best team left in the NFC ...

we are playing well enough to win the NFC Championship against any team

I don't need no stinking upsets so the Redskins can play an 'easy' game


In the NFC - I have the 49ers at 1 and the Falcons as 2 - both are playing really well right now - I rate the Seahawks a little behind those 2 ....

I want the Seahawks, then the Falcons and then the 49ers ...

that's how it should be - not some pansy, 'easy' game to get into the Super Bowl

go ahead - be a pansy - hope for the vikings to win 2 in a row ...

Twisted Evil


Have you ever played a competitive sport? Laughing

There is no such thing as a "lucky" Superbowl. That's an oxymoron.

It took hard work to make the playoffs, win our division. And, all of these games will be hard. But, if you think any competitive player--in any sport--wants to play every game on the road, you're kidding yourself.

History doesn't remember valiant losers. Only winners. There are no pansy Superbowl winners. Whatever you call us, you'd have to call us CHAMPIONS whether we win the NFC at home or on the road.

Geez. I couldn't make this up if I tried.

HAIL TO THE REDSKINS.
Back to top
The Hogster
#######
#######


Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 6999
Location: Washington D.C.

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

One of these was won in a strike shortened year. Do you think anyone cares? It's just as valid as any other Superbowl win. The goal is to add a fourth to this stash. And many more.

By any means necessary.

Back to top
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14698
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 5:55 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Two years from now we will be calling him RG3peat.
Back to top
Link
233437_For Serious Players
oneman56
Hog


Joined: 16 Jul 2004
Posts: 472
Location: Denver, CO

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hogster wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:
It's really simple for me ... unlike many others here I don't want to be considered 'lucky' to win a Super Bowl Twisted Evil

I hope we play Atlanta next week and then whomever is the best team left in the NFC ...

we are playing well enough to win the NFC Championship against any team

I don't need no stinking upsets so the Redskins can play an 'easy' game


In the NFC - I have the 49ers at 1 and the Falcons as 2 - both are playing really well right now - I rate the Seahawks a little behind those 2 ....

I want the Seahawks, then the Falcons and then the 49ers ...

that's how it should be - not some pansy, 'easy' game to get into the Super Bowl

go ahead - be a pansy - hope for the vikings to win 2 in a row ...

Twisted Evil


Have you ever played a competitive sport? Laughing

There is no such thing as a "lucky" Superbowl. That's an oxymoron.

It took hard work to make the playoffs, win our division. And, all of these games will be hard. But, if you think any competitive player--in any sport--wants to play every game on the road, you're kidding yourself.

History doesn't remember valiant losers. Only winners. There are no pansy Superbowl winners. Whatever you call us, you'd have to call us CHAMPIONS whether we win the NFC at home or on the road.

Geez. I couldn't make this up if I tried.

HAIL TO THE REDSKINS.



Not only that but the thought of hosting an NFC championship game at home after hosting all of 1 game here thus far just makes me smile. Nothing about an 'easy' game was ever mentioned, just that the Hogster would like to host a home NFC Champinship game...who, as a Redskin fan, wouldn't besides apparently SJ.
Back to top
skinsfan#33
#33
#33


Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 3875

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 7:53 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hogster wrote:

One of these was won in a strike shortened year.


Actually two were! And no I can't tell the difference.
The Hogster wrote:

Do you think anyone cares? It's just as valid as any other Superbowl win. The goal is to add a fourth to this stash. And many more.

By any means necessary.

Back to top
cowboykillerzRGiii
CKRGiii
CKRGiii


Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 3162
Location: 505 New Mexico repn

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Deadskins wrote:
Two years from now we will be calling him RG3peat.


Nicely done sir! What a nice RING that has Laughing
Back to top
cowboykillerzRGiii
CKRGiii
CKRGiii


Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 3162
Location: 505 New Mexico repn

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 9:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Deadskins wrote:
Two years from now we will be calling him RG3peat.


Nicely done sir! What a nice RING that has Laughing
Back to top
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14698
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Fri Jan 04, 2013 11:04 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

skinsfan#33 wrote:
The Hogster wrote:

One of these was won in a strike shortened year.


Actually two were! And no I can't tell the difference.

Actually, there were two strikes, but only one shortened the season. The other had replacement players playing in three games.
Back to top
Link
361259_Primer Wireless Headset
Page 3 of 4All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Post new topic   Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  Next  



Home Login Register FAQ Search Photo Galleries Wireless Version
Copyright © 2000-2009 www.thehogs.net ( THN ). All Rights Reserved.Powered by php BB