Washington Redskins Message Board
Visit the THN Website 
Washington Redskins Fan Forum spacer Washington Redskins Message Board
Home Login Register Rules FAQ Photo Galleries Thu Jun 20, 2013 5:45 am
Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements.
   TheHogs.net Forum Index » Around the League

 » What would make you happier?

All times are GMT - 5 Hours 
Post new topic   Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next  

What would make you happier?
If the Cowgirls missed the playoffs by 1 game...again?
93%
 93%  [ 58 ]
Or the Cowgirls get to the Super Bowl and then get Humilliated really really badly?
6%
 6%  [ 4 ]
Total Votes : 62

Author Message
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14756
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Primetime42 wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:
Irn-Bru wrote:
forskins wrote:
Irn-Bru wrote:


Wow. Then I suppose that Gibbs won three "bass ackwards" Superbowls, as well as lead a 10-6 team, with a sweep of Dallas, to the playoffs last year. His philosophy on personnel has been fairly consistent throughout his career in the NFL.


All of those Superbowls were before Free Agency, so one could go on spending spree with Free Agents and not think twice about it. That same philosophy won't bring long term success in today's game when Free agents are paid tons more then drafted rookies.



Again, we'll see. The Redskins haven't made as many "high profile" free agent moves in recent years, which is the shift that we're seeing from the early Snyder era. Again, this year was a down year, so I'm not defending our moves, but if you look at the free agents acquired in Gibbs' first two seasons we didn't go for the biggest names out there. . .with the one exception being Clinton Portis--and he's been a great addition, as it turns out.

Marcus Washington, Shawn Springs, Phillip Daniels, Griffin, Rabach, Thomas, Sellers, Moss. . .none of these were the biggest names out there, yet all have contributed as much as Cooley, Jansen, Taylor, Rogers, Marshall, and our other draft picks have.

The key is to pick up FA's without the damage to the salary cap, which has clearly been the Skins strategy in the past few years. And, like I said, we'll see what works and what doesn't. The Cowboys look like the stronger team this year but were swept by the Skins last year. . .and you never know what next year will bring.

Actually, those SBs were not before free agency, just free agency as we know it now. We got Wilbur Marshall in free agency from Da Bears. Also Portis was aquired via trade, not free agency. Same with Moss. But hey, why throw logic and reality into a 'Pie fan's delusions. Laughing
As I recall, draft picks and new contracts were involved.

Selective memory is a great thing, isn't it?

Draft picks and new contracts don't make a trade any less of a trade, do they? Selective comprehension is not so great a thing, is it?
Back to top
Primetime42
Hog


Joined: 09 Dec 2003
Posts: 1722
Location: Romo-sexual

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Just pointing out that it falls into the same category, which is called "Mortgaging the future".

No need to get uppity.
Back to top
JPM36
####
####


Joined: 16 Dec 2004
Posts: 1899
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 5:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Nobody gives a damn what you think.
Back to top
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14756
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 7:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Primetime42 wrote:
Just pointing out that it falls into the same category, which is called "Mortgaging the future".

No need to get uppity.

No there certainly isn't. Especially if you know any history. Say how George Allen and Bobby Beathard "mortgaged the future" all of those years when we went to 5 SBs and 6 Championship games. If you choose wisely, a veteran is often a better deal than a draft pick. BTW the 3 SBs for the 'Pies were the result of the Herschel Walker trade to Minnesota, Mr. selective memory.



PS How's Martin Grammatica treating ya? Laughing What was the damage for Vanderchoke? 2.5 mil or so? That's a hefty mortgage payment for a guy that made 5 of 18 FGs for the 'Pies.
:ROTFALMAO:
Back to top
forskins
Hog


Joined: 20 Sep 2006
Posts: 235

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 10:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JSPB22 wrote:

Actually, those SBs were not before free agency, just free agency as we know it now. We got Wilbur Marshall in free agency from Da Bears. Also Portis was aquired via trade, not free agency. Same with Moss. But hey, why throw logic and reality into a 'Pie fan's delusions. Laughing


You know what, I actually mispoke before, I meant to say Salary Cap. Of course free agency has been around for quite some time.

I know you guys are loving the recent debacle of Vanderjerk. So the Cowboys have one free agent bust this year. Are you the Redskins still paying part of Arrington's salary still? Just curious.
Back to top
Link
THN's Redskins Fan Shop
1niksder
**********
**********


Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 16591
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 10:40 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

forskins wrote:
Are you the Redskins still paying part of Arrington's salary still? Just curious.


This isn't baseball...


Last edited by 1niksder on Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:13 pm; edited 1 time in total
Back to top
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14756
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:10 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1niksder wrote:
forskins wrote:
JSPB22 wrote:

Are you the Redskins still paying part of Arrington's salary still? Just curious.


This isn't baseball...

You're putting foul words in my mouth, 1nik.
Back to top
1niksder
**********
**********


Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 16591
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JSPB22 I have no idea what you are talking about Liar
Back to top
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14756
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Mon Nov 27, 2006 11:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

No, I'm sure you don't. Wink
Back to top
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis


Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 10637
Location: on the bandwagon

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:08 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

forskins wrote:
You know what, I actually mispoke before, I meant to say Salary Cap. Of course free agency has been around for quite some time.

I know you guys are loving the recent debacle of Vanderjerk. So the Cowboys have one free agent bust this year. Are you the Redskins still paying part of Arrington's salary still? Just curious.



forskins, if you can tell me the name of a single player that the Skins wanted to sign but couldn't due to the salary cap, then I'll respond to your point about this being a salary cap era.

Or, if you can tell me when the Skins will actually hit salary cap hell--since we're, you know, "mortgaging our future" and all. . .year after year after year without end. . . Laughing--then we can keep talking. Until then, it looks to me like you're just giving us regurgitated ESPN talking points.
Back to top
Link
New Nike Gear at THN's Redskins Fan Shop
Primetime42
Hog


Joined: 09 Dec 2003
Posts: 1722
Location: Romo-sexual

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 2:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JPM36 wrote:
Nobody gives a damn what you think.
That's an obvious lie considering you offer 5th grade rebuttals to a good 80% of the posts I make here Laughing
Back to top
JPM36
####
####


Joined: 16 Dec 2004
Posts: 1899
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Primetime42 wrote:
JPM36 wrote:
Nobody gives a damn what you think.
That's an obvious lie considering you offer 5th grade rebuttals to a good 80% of the posts I make here Laughing



I don't need to take the time to refute every idiotic post you make.

Other people have already done it for me. Telling you how wrong you are would just be redundant.


Why don't you respond to those posts?
Back to top
Primetime42
Hog


Joined: 09 Dec 2003
Posts: 1722
Location: Romo-sexual

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 4:31 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Go read. I've responded to every rational argument made to me.

You on the other hand, just keep telling me I'm wrong while making backhanded attempts at insulting me.

Instead of telling me I'm wrong, why not try telling me WHY I'm wrong for once?
Back to top
JPM36
####
####


Joined: 16 Dec 2004
Posts: 1899
Location: Las Vegas, NV

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 4:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I never said you were wrong about anything.

All I said was that nobody here cares what you have to say.
Back to top
Primetime42
Hog


Joined: 09 Dec 2003
Posts: 1722
Location: Romo-sexual

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 5:00 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And I told you outright that you're full of it because that simply isn't the case.

There are actually people here I have rational conversation with, you know.
Back to top
Link
522682
		</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td class=
Page 3 of 10All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Post new topic   Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next  



Home Login Register FAQ Search Photo Galleries Wireless Version
Copyright © 2000-2009 www.thehogs.net ( THN ). All Rights Reserved.Powered by php BB