Washington Redskins Message Board
Visit the THN Website 
Washington Redskins Fan Forum spacer Washington Redskins Message Board
Home Login Register Rules FAQ Photo Galleries Sat May 25, 2013 1:29 pm
Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements.
   TheHogs.net Forum Index » Washington Redskins Game Day - 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006

 » Official Panthers vs Redskins Postgame Discussion

All times are GMT - 5 Hours 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  
Author Message
SkinsFreak
Fire in the Sky
Fire in the Sky


Joined: 27 Dec 2005
Posts: 4884
Location: Surfside

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Chris Luva Luva wrote:
With JC in, we're seeing the ball spread around. No more throws to Moss who is being covered by 4 defenders. Our TE's are getting more touches. We're getting a deep ball threat. We're getting a more mobile QB.


Exactly. And no more throws out of bounds, or just throwing the ball away. JC is at least giving the receivers a chance to make a play. I think once JC has had time to gel with the receivers, we will have a real threat in the passing game.
Back to top
1fan4ramsey
Hog


Joined: 21 Oct 2004
Posts: 1379
Location: PA

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:49 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

That touchdown to Randle El couldn't have been made by Brunell
Back to top
Champsturf
~~~
~~~


Joined: 25 Jan 2004
Posts: 2986
Location: Ohio

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:54 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

1fan4ramsey wrote:
That touchdown to Randle El couldn't have been made by Brunell
I really doubt the first down scramble either, not at his age now. I suppose I could live in the past and wish that this was still the '90s and Brunell was in his prime........but I won't.
Back to top
SkinzCanes
Hog


Joined: 25 Oct 2004
Posts: 1513

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Quote:

I don't know if I'm ready to believe that. For the most part, it looked like the same offense under Brunell, only with a taller QB.

Like you said, Campbell didn't light it up, but he certainly made a few key plays.

Now, I'm excited about the kid delivering a win as well, but if you were to change the number on the jersey, it wouldn't look too different of an output, IMO. (right down to the restlessness in the stands, and the calls for Joe to retire, streaming down from the "experts" in the Upper Level)


I don't think that Brunell would've been able to make any of the throws that JC has for td's. Maybe the one to Cooley but I doubt that Brunell would've stepped up in the pocket the way JC did.

The biggest difference between JC and Brunell is the fact that JC will stand in the pocket, look downfield, and stand in there despite the rush. When he leaves the pocket he has a chance to actually complete a pass, unlike Brunell who would just toss the ball out of bounds. Unlike JC, Brunell had happy feet and left the pocket WAY too soon or threw the ball away. And even though JC and his receivers couldn't connect early in the game , the threat of the downfield pass kept the Panthers from stacking the line, thereby allowing Duckett and Betts to run effectively.
Back to top
Skins2daGrave
Hog


Joined: 30 Sep 2006
Posts: 718
Location: Northern Virginia

Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 9:56 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SkinzCanes wrote:
Quote:

I don't know if I'm ready to believe that. For the most part, it looked like the same offense under Brunell, only with a taller QB.

Like you said, Campbell didn't light it up, but he certainly made a few key plays.

Now, I'm excited about the kid delivering a win as well, but if you were to change the number on the jersey, it wouldn't look too different of an output, IMO. (right down to the restlessness in the stands, and the calls for Joe to retire, streaming down from the "experts" in the Upper Level)


I don't think that Brunell would've been able to make any of the throws that JC has for td's. Maybe the one to Cooley but I doubt that Brunell would've stepped up in the pocket the way JC did.

The biggest difference between JC and Brunell is the fact that JC will stand in the pocket, look downfield, and stand in there despite the rush. When he leaves the pocket he has a chance to actually complete a pass, unlike Brunell who would just toss the ball out of bounds. Unlike JC, Brunell had happy feet and left the pocket WAY too soon or threw the ball away. And even though JC and his receivers couldn't connect early in the game , the threat of the downfield pass kept the Panthers from stacking the line, thereby allowing Duckett and Betts to run effectively.


Pray
Back to top
Link
New Nike Gear at THN's Redskins Fan Shop
Redskin Don
Hog


Joined: 19 Sep 2004
Posts: 271
Location: Hopewell, VA

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 9:45 am    Post subject: redeemed skin Reply with quote

Quote:
I don't know if I'm ready to believe that. For the most part, it looked like the same offense under Brunell, only with a taller QB.

Like you said, Campbell didn't light it up, but he certainly made a few key plays.

Now, I'm excited about the kid delivering a win as well, but if you were to change the number on the jersey, it wouldn't look too different of an output, IMO. (right down to the restlessness in the stands, and the calls for Joe to retire, streaming down from the "experts" in the Upper Level)


Can't say I entirely agree with your assessment. The results may look similar right now, but there's one huge difference here: In Campbell, we're looking at a young, athletic QB learning his way with a potentially huge upside. In Brunell, we're looking at a wornout, beaten-up, old QB at the end of his career. I like Brunell, but it's not going to get better. He's had 2 years and it's the same old, same old.
Back to top
REDEEMEDSKIN
~~
~~


Joined: 26 Mar 2004
Posts: 8526
Location: Northern Virginia

Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 1:19 pm    Post subject: Re: redeemed skin Reply with quote

Redskin Don wrote:
...there's one huge difference here: In Campbell, we're looking at a young, athletic QB learning his way with a potentially huge upside. In Brunell, we're looking at a wornout, beaten-up, old QB at the end of his career. I like Brunell, but it's not going to get better.


Agreed, for the most part. However, I will say this: it was annoying to hear calls for Gibbs' head when the kid was throwing errant passes left and right during the game. All I could think was "that's what you wanted, so deal with it."

Definitely, JC has the more upside of the two.
Back to top
Page 4 of 4All times are GMT - 5 Hours
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4  



Home Login Register FAQ Search Photo Galleries Wireless Version
Copyright © 2000-2009 www.thehogs.net ( THN ). All Rights Reserved.Powered by php BB