Washington Redskins Message Board
Visit the THN Website 
Washington Redskins Fan Forum spacer Washington Redskins Message Board
Home Login Register Rules FAQ Photo Galleries Tue Jun 18, 2013 6:38 pm
Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements.
   TheHogs.net Forum Index » Football 101

 » Illegal man downfield

All times are GMT - 5 Hours 
Post new topic   Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2  Next  
Author Message
fredp45
Hog


Joined: 26 Dec 2004
Posts: 1775

Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 6:47 pm    Post subject: Illegal man downfield Reply with quote

Last week vs Dallas, Casey was flagged for being downfield too far on a passing play...

2 questions:

1) What is the rule exactly?
2) Why is that rule in place? My brother and I have two theories (one is about blocking and the other is about appearing like an eligible receiver)

After the game, Trevor M on CSN said that a OL can block a guy all the way down the field on any play, as long as he's engaged with the defender, once he's not engaged he needs to drop to a knee to avoid the flag on a passing play. Does it matter if you're in the play or not? Meaning, you're too far downfield (whatever that is) and the play goes to the other side of the field.

Anyone know anything about this rule?

Thanks a lot...
Back to top
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14754
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Sun Oct 05, 2008 8:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I couldn't find the exact rule, but this might help:
Quote:
Umpire—Primary responsibility to rule on players’ equipment, as well as their conduct and actions on scrimmage line. Lines up approximately four to five yards downfield, varying position from in front of weakside tackle to strongside guard. Looks for possible false start by offensive linemen. Observes legality of contact by both offensive linemen while blocking and by defensive players while they attempt to ward off blockers. Is prepared to call rule infractions if they occur on offense or defense. Moves forward to line of scrimmage when pass play develops in order to insure that interior linemen do not move illegally downfield. If offensive linemen indicate screen pass is to be attempted, Umpire shifts his attention toward screen side, picks up potential receiver in order to insure that he will legally be permitted to run his pattern and continues to rule on action of blockers. Umpire is to assist in ruling on incomplete or trapped passes when ball is thrown overhead or short. On punt plays, Umpire positions himself opposite Referee in offensive backfield—5 yards from kicker and one yard behind.

http://www.supernfl.com/NFLRules.html
Back to top
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
One Step Away


Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Posts: 7779
Location: NoVA

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 10:00 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

This is a little bit better I think. It's not official NFL rules, but seems to comprehensively answer the question:

Quote:
On the illegal man down field penalty, how far down the field is a lineman allowed to go while the quarterback is behind the line of scrimmage? Is there anything else affecting this call? --Max Salk, Northbrook, Ill.

Under NFL rules, it is a foul when an ineligible offensive player, including a T-formation quarterback, prior to a legal forward pass advances beyond the line of scrimmage after losing contact with an opponent at the line of scrimmage. The guidline for officials to use is the offending player must be more than one yard beyond the line of scrimmage prior to the pass.



Link
Back to top
fredp45
Hog


Joined: 26 Dec 2004
Posts: 1775

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 6:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

ok, I appreciate the answer to my first question, now, why is that rule in place? Is it a really old rule that doesn't have much meaning or reason anymore or is it because they don't want lineman blocking downfield (if so, why not?) or is it because a lineman would look like a receiver and confuse the defenders into thinking they must cover that player leaving an eligible receiver open? OR, would a team send everyone downfield (like we did as kids) and therefore, make organized football look more like our pickup games?

I know there are still rules in place that came about 40-50 years ago when the game was very different, more of a running game for sure. Evidenced by the fact, Romo already has more 300 yard passing games than Bart Starr and Roger Staubach combined.

Thanks for the quick responses.
Back to top
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14754
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Mon Oct 06, 2008 7:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There are a couple of reasons for the rule that I can think of off the top of my head:
1. It helps the refs keep track of who is an eligible receiver, and who is not, if only receivers can be down the field.
2. Blockers could be downfield ahead of the receiver, to basically block the defenders from being able to cover receivers. So you could be setting up a screen pass 20 yards downfield without the rule.
Back to top
Link
522682
		</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td class=
Thundersloth
Hog


Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 623
Location: Annandale, VA

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 3:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yes, the old ineligible man downfield call. This rule is in place to help keep teams from "flooding" zones with players that would influence the defensive coverage schemes.

Most officials will give you about 2-3 yards downfield before they call you for being downfield.

It is also a penalty for any ineligible receiver to be the first to touch the ball, it is the "illegal touching" rule.
Back to top
welch
Skins History Buff
Skins History Buff


Joined: 10 Jan 2004
Posts: 4671
Location: New York, NY

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 4:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The rule exists because it would give an unfair advantage to the offense if a couple of guards could go downfield to block for a receiver. Imagine if the screen play could be run five yards beyond the line of scrimmage.

It's not really an antique rule.
Back to top
fredp45
Hog


Joined: 26 Dec 2004
Posts: 1775

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:05 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks again...

Therein lies the problem. Thundersloth and Welch, the last two posters, gave two different reasons:

1) so ineligible receives don't flood an area, requiring the defense to worry about covering them; and

2) so they don't block downfield.

Is this rule in place for both reasons or just one of them?

When this happened to the Skins, vs Dallas, my brother and I each thought it was for a different reason. I thought it was 1) above as I think it would be unfair to send people downfield that are ineligible to catch the ball as that would confuse defenders on who to cover. I didn't believe it's blocking based.

My brother thought it was 2) above. I don't believe 2) is the answer as a flag is thrown whether you're blocking or not...like Casey vs Dallas who was just standing downfield.

Remember, you can't block downfield until the ball has been received whether you're eligible or not -- ala, Devin Thomas getting flagged this weekend vs Eagles for blocking before Santana caught the pass.

Okay, I know, who really cares? I just find some rules worth thinking about and discussing and this one hit me after Casey was flagged for it. I even wonder if the rule shouldn't provide an out if the player isn't near the action. Casey is 4 yards downfield on the right but the play goes deep left.

Anyway...thanks again to the responders.
Back to top
Fios
The Evil Straw
The Evil Straw


Joined: 12 Jan 2004
Posts: 8219
Location: Leather Chair

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:06 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

According to Trevor Mattich, the rule actually states that if Casey had taken a knee there, he would not have been flagged, because he can be downfield so long as he's engaging the defender but once the defender breaks away, he has to go down to one knee.
Back to top
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14754
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Wed Oct 08, 2008 8:19 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Fios wrote:
According to Trevor Mattich, the rule actually states that if Casey had taken a knee there, he would not have been flagged, because he can be downfield so long as he's engaging the defender but once the defender breaks away, he has to go down to one knee.

Take a knee, Rabach! Sounds like something a high-school coach would say. Laughing
Back to top
Link
361259_Primer Wireless Headset
Thundersloth
Hog


Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 623
Location: Annandale, VA

Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 8:59 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm gonna say it's got a bit to do with both confusing the defensive coverages and blocking downfield.

I'm not sure on the NFL rule but I do know that linemen can be downfield as far as they want blocking on a pass play as long as the pass is completed behind the LOS in the college game. I'll try to research that and get back to you.
Back to top
Thundersloth
Hog


Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 623
Location: Annandale, VA

Posted: Thu Oct 09, 2008 9:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I looked a couple of places and really couldn't get a straight answer about the rule. I wish the NFL would just put the rules online, it would make it a lot easier.

I saw one message board where they said that "when the offensive lineman advances beyond the line of scrimmage on a normal play, it tells the defense that a pass will not be thrown on the play. This is the reason that the penalty exists. It would be sending a false message to the defense and would change its defensive reaction on the play. The defense is set up to do different things based on whether the play is a run or pass -- if a tackle hits a linebacker, the linebacker immediately knows it's a run and he doesn't have to worry about pass defense."

http://the506.com/yabb/YaBB.pl?num=1220994993

But that doesn't sound right to me, I've seen teams do "influence pulls" to draw up LBs, play action draws up LBs and draw plays themselves are meant to deceive LBs.
Back to top
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14754
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 8:05 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

On a draw, the blocking mimics a pass, though. The linemen backpedal instead of driving off the ball, as for a run.
Back to top
Bob 0119
The Punisher
The Punisher


Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Posts: 2571
Location: Manassas

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 11:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think the idea is largely to keep the structure of the line of scrimmage intact.

Otherwise you would have 10 eligable recievers and the game would quickly devolve into a game of keep-away.
Back to top
Thundersloth
Hog


Joined: 22 Aug 2008
Posts: 623
Location: Annandale, VA

Posted: Fri Oct 10, 2008 3:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

JSPB22 wrote:
On a draw, the blocking mimics a pass, though. The linemen backpedal instead of driving off the ball, as for a run.


Totally correct JS but I was referring to this part of the statement:

It would be sending a false message to the defense and would change its defensive reaction on the play. The defense is set up to do different things based on whether the play is a run or pass

That's exactly what the draw is supposed to do; send a false message to the defense and get the LBs to drop and "draw" the D-line upfield, which is why I don't agree with the statement of why the penalty exists.

Bob

You can't have 10 eligible receivers because the only players who are eligible are:

A) last man on the LOS i.e. tight ends and split ends or
B) players that are lined up in the offensive backfield.
Back to top
Link
THN's Redskins Fan Shop
Page 1 of 2All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Post new topic   Reply to topic Goto page 1, 2  Next  



Home Login Register FAQ Search Photo Galleries Wireless Version
Copyright © 2000-2009 www.thehogs.net ( THN ). All Rights Reserved.Powered by php BB