| Author |
Message |
langleyparkjoe
**LPJ**
Joined: 05 Oct 2007
Posts: 5993
Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:54 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| SouthLondonRedskin wrote: | | Surely its a case of the smaller the bench the more skillful a game it is....? |
I think that's what DS and I are trying to accomplish my friend.
The case last year was we had plenty of bench and players were just being added and not used. So if someone had an injured player and tried to get someone else, you'd find there was nobody available. |
|
| Back to top |
|
ATX_Skins
ATX
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 3322
Location: NOVA
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 9:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
The problem is last year if you needed a player on either side of the ball you were screwed.
I personally can't stand IDP's but I've adjusted.
BTW DS, defense doesn't win championships anymore. |
|
| Back to top |
|
langleyparkjoe
**LPJ**
Joined: 05 Oct 2007
Posts: 5993
Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:00 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ATX_Skins wrote: | The problem is last year if you needed a player on either side of the ball you were screwed.
I personally can't stand IDP's but I've adjusted.
BTW DS, defense doesn't win championships anymore. |
You don't think the Giants defense played a major part in both their wins over the Pats? I understand a couple lucky offensive plays but they were able to "somewhat" control Brady and that itself is HUGE |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14718
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| langleyparkjoe wrote: | | ATX_Skins wrote: | The problem is last year if you needed a player on either side of the ball you were screwed.
I personally can't stand IDP's but I've adjusted.
BTW DS, defense doesn't win championships anymore. |
You don't think the Giants defense played a major part in both their wins over the Pats? I understand a couple lucky offensive plays but they were able to "somewhat" control Brady and that itself is HUGE |
Exactly! If the Patsies defense was as good, they would have won both games. Defense still wins championships. Always has, always will. And it's funny that you hate IDPs but are so proud of your new avatar. |
|
| Back to top |
|
langleyparkjoe
**LPJ**
Joined: 05 Oct 2007
Posts: 5993
Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:10 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | And it's funny that you hate IDPs but are so proud of your new avatar. |
OH WOW, THAT ONE HAD TO STING!!!!!
<--- crackin up
This season is gonna be AWESOME!!! I can't wait!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
ATX_Skins
ATX
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 3322
Location: NOVA
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | langleyparkjoe wrote: | | ATX_Skins wrote: | The problem is last year if you needed a player on either side of the ball you were screwed.
I personally can't stand IDP's but I've adjusted.
BTW DS, defense doesn't win championships anymore. |
You don't think the Giants defense played a major part in both their wins over the Pats? I understand a couple lucky offensive plays but they were able to "somewhat" control Brady and that itself is HUGE |
Exactly! If the Patsies defense was as good, they would have won both games. Defense still wins championships. Always has, always will. And it's funny that you hate IDPs but are so proud of your new avatar. |
I just remember back to how simple and fun fantasy football was at first. everyone had a chance to win every week. It's gotten complicated in the last two years or so with all the additions.
I love defense don't get me wrong. The Pats would have won if Welker caught that ball, and yall would be singin a different tune.
I'm also very proud of my new avatar! Kerrigan is a beast. |
|
| Back to top |
|
langleyparkjoe
**LPJ**
Joined: 05 Oct 2007
Posts: 5993
Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| ATX_Skins wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | langleyparkjoe wrote: | | ATX_Skins wrote: | The problem is last year if you needed a player on either side of the ball you were screwed.
I personally can't stand IDP's but I've adjusted.
BTW DS, defense doesn't win championships anymore. |
You don't think the Giants defense played a major part in both their wins over the Pats? I understand a couple lucky offensive plays but they were able to "somewhat" control Brady and that itself is HUGE |
Exactly! If the Patsies defense was as good, they would have won both games. Defense still wins championships. Always has, always will. And it's funny that you hate IDPs but are so proud of your new avatar. |
I just remember back to how simple and fun fantasy football was at first. everyone had a chance to win every week. It's gotten complicated in the last two years or so with all the additions.
I love defense don't get me wrong. The Pats would have won if Welker caught that ball, and yall would be singin a different tune.
I'm also very proud of my new avatar! Kerrigan is a beast. |
You do know that IDPs have been in fantasy football since the beginning right?
To me its a very novice league just having offense and defenses when IDPs do so much for the game and should get their proper appreication. IMO. |
|
| Back to top |
|
ATX_Skins
ATX
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 3322
Location: NOVA
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| langleyparkjoe wrote: | | ATX_Skins wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | langleyparkjoe wrote: | | ATX_Skins wrote: | The problem is last year if you needed a player on either side of the ball you were screwed.
I personally can't stand IDP's but I've adjusted.
BTW DS, defense doesn't win championships anymore. |
You don't think the Giants defense played a major part in both their wins over the Pats? I understand a couple lucky offensive plays but they were able to "somewhat" control Brady and that itself is HUGE |
Exactly! If the Patsies defense was as good, they would have won both games. Defense still wins championships. Always has, always will. And it's funny that you hate IDPs but are so proud of your new avatar. |
I just remember back to how simple and fun fantasy football was at first. everyone had a chance to win every week. It's gotten complicated in the last two years or so with all the additions.
I love defense don't get me wrong. The Pats would have won if Welker caught that ball, and yall would be singin a different tune.
I'm also very proud of my new avatar! Kerrigan is a beast. |
You do know that IDPs have been in fantasy football since the beginning right?
To me its a very novice league just having offense and defenses when IDPs do so much for the game and should get their proper appreication. IMO. |
You do know that I am always right don't you?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14718
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 10:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| langleyparkjoe wrote: | | To me its a very novice league just having offense and defenses when IDPs do so much for the game and should get their proper appreication. IMO. |
Well then why are you cutting the number down? |
|
| Back to top |
|
langleyparkjoe
**LPJ**
Joined: 05 Oct 2007
Posts: 5993
Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:37 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | langleyparkjoe wrote: | | To me its a very novice league just having offense and defenses when IDPs do so much for the game and should get their proper appreication. IMO. |
Well then why are you cutting the number down? |
To accommodate the people who couldn't handle it.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14718
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| langleyparkjoe wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | langleyparkjoe wrote: | | To me its a very novice league just having offense and defenses when IDPs do so much for the game and should get their proper appreication. IMO. |
Well then why are you cutting the number down? |
To accommodate the people who couldn't handle it. |
You should cut them, not the IDPs.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
ATX_Skins
ATX
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 3322
Location: NOVA
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 12:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I will adjust to whatever you guys want to do. I would just like to have a better free agency pool in case of injuries etc... |
|
| Back to top |
|
langleyparkjoe
**LPJ**
Joined: 05 Oct 2007
Posts: 5993
Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 12:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ATX_Skins wrote: | | I will adjust to whatever you guys want to do. I would just like to have a better free agency pool in case of injuries etc... |
So you too are in agreement with less bench players.
Good, thanks for letting me know.. I think 5 is the best number to go with.
Just make sure you guys draft accordingly because emphasis is now on how you draft unlike the previous seasons. |
|
| Back to top |
|
cowboykillerzRGiii
CKRGiii
Joined: 29 Jul 2010
Posts: 3163
Location: 505 New Mexico repn
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:35 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Someone tell me Wtf IDP stands for? Sob |
|
| Back to top |
|
langleyparkjoe
**LPJ**
Joined: 05 Oct 2007
Posts: 5993
Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
|
| Posted: Thu Jun 21, 2012 1:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| cowboykillerzRED wrote: | | Someone tell me Wtf IDP stands for? Sob |
Individual Defensive Players
So basically not just defenses alone we're working with but also defensive players.
1- LB
1- DB
1- Defensive Flex meaning you can use a LB, DB or even a DL if you'd like.
Trust me bro, once you do a league with IDPs, going back to novice leagues are a total buzzkill. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
| Page 34 of 50 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
