Washington Redskins Message Board
Visit the THN Website 
Washington Redskins Fan Forum spacer Washington Redskins Message Board
Home Login Register Rules FAQ Photo Galleries Fri May 24, 2013 11:11 am
Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements.
   TheHogs.net Forum Index » NFL Draft 2003-2010

 » Sam Bradford?

All times are GMT - 5 Hours 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next  
Author Message
riggofan
Hog


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 2947
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sounds like Bradford had a pretty good day today. I think its weird though about the Rams having him for another workout three days before the draft. I kind of think that they're trying to deal that pick.
Back to top
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo


Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 10021
Location: Kazmania

Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 2:57 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

riggofan wrote:
Sounds like Bradford had a pretty good day today. I think its weird though about the Rams having him for another workout three days before the draft. I kind of think that they're trying to deal that pick.

If the Rams are smart, they would follow every path. You should believe both that they are keeping the pick and trading it. In the end, they pick the best option. Nothing is gained by choosing now. In finance we have an expression, an option is better alive then dead. You never give away an option for free no matter how unlikely it is. Same here.
Back to top
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Canes Skin


Joined: 13 Aug 2007
Posts: 6870
Location: Alexandria, VA

Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:17 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

KazooSkinsFan wrote:
riggofan wrote:
Sounds like Bradford had a pretty good day today. I think its weird though about the Rams having him for another workout three days before the draft. I kind of think that they're trying to deal that pick.

If the Rams are smart, they would follow every path. You should believe both that they are keeping the pick and trading it. In the end, they pick the best option. Nothing is gained by choosing now. In finance we have an expression, an option is better alive then dead. You never give away an option for free no matter how unlikely it is. Same here.


True, but if you have the first overall pick you should have a contract in place before the draft so I workout three days before the draft is pretty strange.
Back to top
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo


Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 10021
Location: Kazmania

Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 3:46 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

CanesSkins26 wrote:
True, but if you have the first overall pick you should have a contract in place before the draft so I workout three days before the draft is pretty strange.

Getting a contract in place before the draft is a good point. I'm not sure that the workout plan precludes it. First, they want to keep it open to give other teams the time to make them an offer. Also, they could be negotiating and just actually sign him after the workout. They aren't on the clock yet and I don't remember anyone signing the #1 pick this early. They also don't want to blow their leverage with Bradford. Maybe they're going to try to convince him they're considering Tebow with the #1 pick to keep the price down. Laughing
Back to top
The Hogster
#######
#######


Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 7002
Location: Washington D.C.

Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:16 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Last year I was relieved when the Jets got Sanchez. This year I will be relieved if the Rams get Bradford. Our line was awful last year even when Samuels was in the game. Now we've lost him also and the line will get anyone killed. I like Okung at 4 and Saffold or Ducasse in the 2nd.

If we could acquire another 2nd - we could address the QB position if Shanahan likes any of the 2nd round guys like: Lefevour, McCoy, etc.
Back to top
Link
361259_Primer Wireless Headset
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo


Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 10021
Location: Kazmania

Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:23 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hogster wrote:
If we could acquire another 2nd - we could address the QB position if Shanahan likes any of the 2nd round guys like: Lefevour, McCoy, etc.

Good point

Think How would we acquire another second though, any ideas?
Back to top
The Hogster
#######
#######


Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 7002
Location: Washington D.C.

Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 5:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

KazooSkinsFan wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
If we could acquire another 2nd - we could address the QB position if Shanahan likes any of the 2nd round guys like: Lefevour, McCoy, etc.

Good point

Think How would we acquire another second though, any ideas?


Laughing I've got a couple.
Back to top
Manchester_Redskin
Hog


Joined: 02 Mar 2004
Posts: 468
Location: Ex-Brit now living in Thailand

Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 8:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If defenses are smart they will test that arm out by dumping him on it a few times
Back to top
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ


Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11519
Location: New England

Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:29 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hogster wrote:
Last year I was relieved when the Jets got Sanchez. This year I will be relieved if the Rams get Bradford. Our line was awful last year even when Samuels was in the game. Now we've lost him also and the line will get anyone killed. I like Okung at 4 and Saffold or Ducasse in the 2nd.
If we could acquire another 2nd - we could address the QB position if Shanahan likes any of the 2nd round guys like: Lefevour, McCoy, etc.


Let's get all the quotes out early -

"Campbell will look great behind an OK line"
"we should just rebuild the offensive line, any QB will be fine"

I could care less about another OK QB - Campbell and Grossman are "OK QBs" too Laughing

being this close to a QB that is as good as this is just a shame - we'll be able to look back in future years and say - "we really sucked in 2009 but it might have been better if we'd been a little bit worse cause then we could have drafted Bradford" Shocked
Back to top
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ


Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11519
Location: New England

Posted: Mon Mar 29, 2010 9:58 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I'm not against building the line but it really is a shame not to have a really good QB
Back to top
Link
THN's Redskins Fan Shop
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo


Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 10021
Location: Kazmania

Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 7:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hogster wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
If we could acquire another 2nd - we could address the QB position if Shanahan likes any of the 2nd round guys like: Lefevour, McCoy, etc.

Good point

Think How would we acquire another second though, any ideas?


Laughing I've got a couple.

Do any of them start with ":cool:" and end with "ey?" Wink
Back to top
The Hogster
#######
#######


Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 7002
Location: Washington D.C.

Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 8:59 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

KazooSkinsFan wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
KazooSkinsFan wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
If we could acquire another 2nd - we could address the QB position if Shanahan likes any of the 2nd round guys like: Lefevour, McCoy, etc.

Good point

Think How would we acquire another second though, any ideas?


Laughing I've got a couple.

Do any of them start with ":cool:" and end with "ey?" Wink


**slow clap**


**crickets**
Back to top
riggofan
Hog


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 2947
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 10:22 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hogster wrote:
Last year I was relieved when the Jets got Sanchez. This year I will be relieved if the Rams get Bradford. Our line was awful last year even when Samuels was in the game.


I've been feeling that same way since the season ended. But reading more about what Shanahan may be thinking with taking Bradford, I won't be crushed if we take him, especially if Shanahan feels he can be a franchise QB. The Redskins Insider item on it today has some good stuff:

http://voices.washingtonpost.com/redskinsinsider/mike-shanahan/the-redskins-shanahans-and-sam.html

I think the biggest thing if we take Bradford is that we don't rush him onto the field this year behind our woeful line. Get what you can from Campbell for another year.

This is DC though. If we're 2-4 to start the season you know people will be HOWLING for the rookie whether it is the right thing to do or not.
Back to top
KazooSkinsFan
kazoo
kazoo


Joined: 05 Sep 2004
Posts: 10021
Location: Kazmania

Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 10:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hogster wrote:
**slow clap**


**crickets**

That's your insult? How long did you spend coming up with that?
Back to top
brad7686
B-rad
B-rad


Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 2991
Location: De La War

Posted: Tue Mar 30, 2010 11:06 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Manchester_Redskin wrote:
If defenses are smart they will test that arm out by dumping him on it a few times


yea i'll really be happy if they avoid Bradford. I see no reason he can't be a good qb. I just have reservations about the competition he faced, the fact his team was so good, and most importantly that his throwing shoulder could crumble at any moment
Back to top
Link
522682
		</td>
	</tr>
	<tr>
		<td class=
Page 4 of 6All times are GMT - 5 Hours
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  Next  



Home Login Register FAQ Search Photo Galleries Wireless Version
Copyright © 2000-2009 www.thehogs.net ( THN ). All Rights Reserved.Powered by php BB