Washington Redskins Message Board
Visit the THN Website 
Washington Redskins Fan Forum spacer Washington Redskins Message Board
Home Login Register Rules FAQ Photo Galleries Sat May 18, 2013 2:40 pm
Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements.
   TheHogs.net Forum Index » NFL Draft 2003-2010

 » Sam Bradford?

All times are GMT - 5 Hours 
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  
Author Message
PulpExposure
Pushing Paper
Pushing Paper


Joined: 06 Sep 2005
Posts: 4461

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 9:29 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SkinsJock wrote:
fleetus wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:
I think that for Gil Brandt to say that in his opinion Bradford looks like he will be a very good QB is really a very big deal

I don't think that Bradford should be the #1 overall draft pick BUT I do think we should take him at 4 no matter who else is available Laughing

I also do not want to try and trade up for him either


Brandt also told Holmgren if he drafts McCoy and runs the West Coast offense, he would make them forget about Joe Montana. you have to take these comments with a grain of salt. Although, I do like McCoy quite a bit.


totally agree - both Brandt and Holmgren also thought the Redskins should take Bradford but if he's gone we should take Okung - I like the way these guys think - almost makes me feel like I know what I'm talking about Shocked


Operative word is almost Wink
Back to top
djactionman
newbie


Joined: 30 Mar 2010
Posts: 19
Location: Nevada

Posted: Fri Apr 02, 2010 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The only defining reason I might say that Shan would draft Colt is *because* they aren't working him out. He did that with Cutler-who would have been an elite Broncos QB, they should have never let Shan go, and never let JMcD bobble that and make that mess.
The best thing the Skins have done in a long time is hire Shanny- a new era is upon us all. This offseason is a telling thing, smart moves, brains over wallet.
Back to top
riggofan
Hog


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 2940
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Posted: Mon Apr 05, 2010 3:30 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

djactionman wrote:
This offseason is a telling thing, smart moves, brains over wallet.


Still seems to be plenty of wallet to go around too!
Back to top
fleetus
Hog


Joined: 25 Apr 2004
Posts: 1757
Location: Charlottesville, Va.

Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 3:50 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

As an interesting note, read this about how intelligent we skins fans are, according to Peter King.

Quote:
Factoid of the Week That May Interest Only Me

The impact of this note is moot now that the Redskins have acquired McNabb, but I find it an interesting sign of an intelligent fan base. The Washington Post asked its readers last week if they favored the Redskins moving up in the draft to acquire the draft rights to Oklahoma quarterback Bradford.

In most cases, fans of teams without a certain quarterback of the future would jump at the chance to take a kid who is a legitimate franchise quarterback prospect. That's why the result of this poll surprised me. Post readers, 25,330 of them as of this weekend, were 57 percent against, 42 percent in favor. (Don't ask me why it doesn't add up to 100 percent; I'm just reading off the paper's Web site.)

Those are some mature readers who know their football, readers who are tired of an aging, leaky offensive line getting passer Jason Campbell chased all over the field. Not that GM Bruce Allen and Mike Shanahan are going to pay attention to the poll, but it's interesting that a solid majority of a team's fans would rather have a tackle many of them have never heard of than a quarterback who might be a longtime Pro Bowler.



http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2010/writers/peter_king/04/05/mcnabb/3.html#ixzz0kM5dwArN
Back to top
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ


Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11504
Location: New England

Posted: Tue Apr 06, 2010 10:34 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

sorry fleetus, but there is absolutely nothing that this scum says or writes about our Redskins that really interests me in the slightest

I think this article in the post was reported earlier in this thread and maybe even by me but more in line with supporting the fact that most fans here want to get the offensive line here fixed after what we saw last year

that being said - getting a future HOF QB (which Bradford is) here would be great - just not happening this year Laughing
Back to top
Link
233437_For Serious Players
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge


Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 12766
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SkinsJock wrote:
sorry fleetus, but there is absolutely nothing that this scum says or writes about our Redskins that really interests me in the slightest



Agreed... If we're so friggin smart, why did it take him so many years to come to the same conclusion as us about Art Monk? Rolling Eyes
Back to top
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14695
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Yeah, who's this guy to say we're smart? Oh wait... does this mean we shouldn't agree?
Back to top
langleyparkjoe
**LPJ**
**LPJ**


Joined: 05 Oct 2007
Posts: 5991
Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 8:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

aye holdup, he said a tackle that we never heard of? so he's calling us dumb again i guess because i'm dag gone sure all of us knew who okung was
Back to top
riggofan
Hog


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 2940
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 9:16 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

SkinsJock wrote:
that being said - getting a future HOF QB (which Bradford is) here would be great


Well, I'll say one thing. You have a 50% chance of being right!
Back to top
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
FanFromAnnapolis


Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 10623
Location: on the bandwagon

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 10:40 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Countertrey wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:
sorry fleetus, but there is absolutely nothing that this scum says or writes about our Redskins that really interests me in the slightest



Agreed... If we're so friggin smart, why did it take him so many years to come to the same conclusion as us about Art Monk? Rolling Eyes


I believe he's the guy who outright admitted that he voted for Monk just so they wouldn't have to keep debating his candidacy year after year. (It was either him or the other numnuts . . . Dr. "Z"(??))
Back to top
Link
361259_Primer Wireless Headset
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14695
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Wed Apr 07, 2010 11:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Irn-Bru wrote:
Countertrey wrote:
SkinsJock wrote:
sorry fleetus, but there is absolutely nothing that this scum says or writes about our Redskins that really interests me in the slightest



Agreed... If we're so friggin smart, why did it take him so many years to come to the same conclusion as us about Art Monk? Rolling Eyes


I believe he's the guy who outright admitted that he voted for Monk just so they wouldn't have to keep debating his candidacy year after year. (It was either him or the other numnuts . . . Dr. "Z"(??))

It was he. Dr d'Zs still voted against him.
Back to top
Page 6 of 6All times are GMT - 5 Hours
This forum is locked: you cannot post, reply to, or edit topics.   This topic is locked: you cannot edit posts or make replies. Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6  



Home Login Register FAQ Search Photo Galleries Wireless Version
Copyright © 2000-2009 www.thehogs.net ( THN ). All Rights Reserved.Powered by php BB