| Author |
Message |
fleetus
Hog
Joined: 25 Apr 2004
Posts: 1757
Location: Charlottesville, Va.
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:09 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| frankcal20 wrote: | ...to continue:
#4 - We move up by using Haynesworth to pick up Bradford and them move him to a team like Seattle for their two first round picks and maybe another mid round like a 4th. We can pick up a lineman in the 1st and then one of the stud CB's, a safety, LB or even a QB like Tebow as a future project player/trick play guy. |
I thought about this. Similar to the trade with Detroit idea. But why does STL do it? Why wouldn't they rather just trade down with Seattle or SF? Haynesworth again maybe? I think their fans might riot they've been worked up into such a Bradford frenzy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 8965
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 12:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The GM of StL said yesterday that the fan's would be happy. There's also a lot of fans out there that are upset that it's been rumored that Bradford does not want to play in StL. There's also a lot of people out there want Okung too because regardless of who's behind center, he needs to be protected and McCoy could be a better fit anyways. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
Posts: 5261
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Man, I heard a rumor that the Redskins could offer Haynesworth, Landry and the 4th for the #1 overall...  I would be seriously upset if that happened. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Countertrey
the 'mudge
Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 12769
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 1:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Never listen to rumors on draft day... you'll end up on drugs. |
|
| Back to top |
|
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 8965
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Skinsfan55 wrote: | | Man, I heard a rumor that the Redskins could offer Haynesworth, Landry and the 4th for the #1 overall... :puke: I would be seriously upset if that happened. |
I don't see how moving to the #1 for a player like Bradford makes any sense at all. Now if we were planning on taking out one of those players and using McNabb there, well then it would make more sense b/c then you could just have JC run the team this year and sit Bradford. I like having a rookie sit and watch a year to learn the NFL game. But I see that less than a 5% chance. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
fleetus
Hog
Joined: 25 Apr 2004
Posts: 1757
Location: Charlottesville, Va.
|
| Posted: Thu Apr 22, 2010 2:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
In my original post, I said i don't see any trade down options for the Skins because there isn't enough demand for the players available at #4. Berry being the most interesting, but I said i don't see a team using a top 4 pick on a safety.
Well, I just read in the Cleveland Plain Dealer that Holmgren wants Berry and fears either KC or Seattle will pick him. This could mean Cleveland might be interested in giving up a pick or two to move up to #4. Cleveland Drafts Berry and Washington moves down to 7 and takes the best LT still on the board between Okung, Williams and Bulaga.
This is an example where the draft value charts go right out the window. If the Skins really want to add some more draft picks and don't see much difference in the value between the top three LT's, they have nothing to lose and might accept a little less than your standard 300 point late 2nd round pick. By the way, Cleveland has three 3rd round picks. |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
