| Author |
Message |
Jeremy81 Hog
Joined: 04 Mar 2004 Posts: 811
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 11:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| I don't think locker or mallet will be available by the time we pick. I wouldn't mind waiting on qb until the second round. Maybe a guy like Andy Dalton and picking up a stud OL in the first or maybe a julio Jones. I just think the top 4 qbs will be gone by the time we pick |
|
| Back to top |
|
KazooSkinsFan kazoo

Joined: 05 Sep 2004 Posts: 10021 Location: Kazmania
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 11:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Jeremy81 wrote: | | I don't think locker or mallet will be available by the time we pick. I wouldn't mind waiting on qb until the second round. Maybe a guy like Andy Dalton and picking up a stud OL in the first or maybe a julio Jones. I just think the top 4 qbs will be gone by the time we pick |
There is very little chance we're going OL in the first round because we don't need an LT and anywhere else it's a stretch pick. The only way is if a very good RT is available, but that's in the long shot category. People like tossing out the go OL in the first round w/o analyzing what they are saying. A receiver is definitely possible though. I'm hoping we get a good 3-4 DL or LB. But drafting for position is a mistake we're not likely to make as Shanny is smart enough to avoid that trap, so it really depends who's there. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Red_One43 Hog
Joined: 16 Aug 2008 Posts: 4606 Location: D.C.
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
| KazooSkinsFan wrote: | | Jeremy81 wrote: | | I don't think locker or mallet will be available by the time we pick. I wouldn't mind waiting on qb until the second round. Maybe a guy like Andy Dalton and picking up a stud OL in the first or maybe a julio Jones. I just think the top 4 qbs will be gone by the time we pick |
There is very little chance we're going OL in the first round because we don't need an LT and anywhere else it's a stretch pick. The only way is if a very good RT is available, but that's in the long shot category. People like tossing out the go OL in the first round w/o analyzing what they are saying. A receiver is definitely possible though. I'm hoping we get a good 3-4 DL or LB. But drafting for position is a mistake we're not likely to make as Shanny is smart enough to avoid that trap, so it really depends who's there. |
Receiver? How about A.J. Green? |
|
| Back to top |
|
KazooSkinsFan kazoo

Joined: 05 Sep 2004 Posts: 10021 Location: Kazmania
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Red_One43 wrote: | | KazooSkinsFan wrote: | | Jeremy81 wrote: | | I don't think locker or mallet will be available by the time we pick. I wouldn't mind waiting on qb until the second round. Maybe a guy like Andy Dalton and picking up a stud OL in the first or maybe a julio Jones. I just think the top 4 qbs will be gone by the time we pick |
There is very little chance we're going OL in the first round because we don't need an LT and anywhere else it's a stretch pick. The only way is if a very good RT is available, but that's in the long shot category. People like tossing out the go OL in the first round w/o analyzing what they are saying. A receiver is definitely possible though. I'm hoping we get a good 3-4 DL or LB. But drafting for position is a mistake we're not likely to make as Shanny is smart enough to avoid that trap, so it really depends who's there. |
Receiver? How about A.J. Green? |
I like going big. Assuming we keep Moss that would be a good combination |
|
| Back to top |
|
TCIYM Hog
Joined: 10 Apr 2009 Posts: 441
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm reading the local pundits discussing the possibility of trading Cooley to move up in the draft and asking myself why? I wouldn't trade Cooley for Andrew Luck or anyone else in this draft but that's just me. We will get someone at a position of need if we stay at 14, or even if we trade down. If this franchise trades Cooley for a project player ...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
Deadskins JSPB22

Joined: 02 Jul 2004 Posts: 14695 Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What is it about trading Cooley that makes some Skins fans drool?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
TCIYM Hog
Joined: 10 Apr 2009 Posts: 441
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 1:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | What is it about trading Cooley that makes some Skins fans drool?  |
Cooley is one of the very few pieces that the Redskins have worth anything in trade (aside from the players who won't be moved at any price) so the local media appears to be running the gamut if rumors through the mill. I don't know that anyone wanting Cooley moved could be considered a Redskins fan. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Jeremy81 Hog
Joined: 04 Mar 2004 Posts: 811
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 2:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| KazooSkinsFan wrote: | | Jeremy81 wrote: | | I don't think locker or mallet will be available by the time we pick. I wouldn't mind waiting on qb until the second round. Maybe a guy like Andy Dalton and picking up a stud OL in the first or maybe a julio Jones. I just think the top 4 qbs will be gone by the time we pick |
There is very little chance we're going OL in the first round because we don't need an LT and anywhere else it's a stretch pick. The only way is if a very good RT is available, but that's in the long shot category. People like tossing out the go OL in the first round w/o analyzing what they are saying. A receiver is definitely possible though. I'm hoping we get a good 3-4 DL or LB. But drafting for position is a mistake we're not likely to make as Shanny is smart enough to avoid that trap, so it really depends who's there. |
i'm not suggesting we take another LT with our pick. we're not going to have a top ten pick. picking a great G or C with a pick in the teens is not all that obsurd. Iupati and pouncey were both picked in the teens. it's doesn't neccessarily have to be a RT. stefen wisniewski or rodney hudson could both be worth a mid round pick. to assume people don't analyze what they say because they make suggestions you don't agree with is a bit off base. my whole point was that our first round pick doesn't have to be taken on a qb. there will be good qbs available in the second round |
|
| Back to top |
|
KazooSkinsFan kazoo

Joined: 05 Sep 2004 Posts: 10021 Location: Kazmania
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 5:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jeremy81 wrote: | | i'm not suggesting we take another LT with our pick. we're not going to have a top ten pick. picking a great G or C with a pick in the teens is not all that obsurd. Iupati and pouncey were both picked in the teens. it's doesn't neccessarily have to be a RT. stefen wisniewski or rodney hudson could both be worth a mid round pick. to assume people don't analyze what they say because they make suggestions you don't agree with is a bit off base. my whole point was that our first round pick doesn't have to be taken on a qb. there will be good qbs available in the second round |
I agree it's "possible." But you're naming people who were picked in the interior in those positions. Logically saying that people are picked in those spots means we are likely to be able to draft quality players at those spots are entirely different. I agree with you that "if" an interior lineman or RT at that position is available worth that pick, "then" we can pick them. But you stated it as our primary draft objective, and that's very, very unlikely. Even though I agree with you it's "possible." |
|
| Back to top |
|
langleyparkjoe **LPJ**

Joined: 05 Oct 2007 Posts: 5991 Location: Langley Park, MD *Tick Tock*
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 10:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Wait, I thought Arizona had Jake first and then Denver had him after? No?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
chiefhog44 **ch44

Joined: 26 Nov 2007 Posts: 2300 Location: Chicago
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 10:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| langleyparkjoe wrote: | Wait, I thought Arizona had Jake first and then Denver had him after? No?  |
They did. He had a QB rating in 2002 of like 56 and was cast off. Shannahan picked him up and made him into a pro bowl player |
|
| Back to top |
|
Red_One43 Hog
Joined: 16 Aug 2008 Posts: 4606 Location: D.C.
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 10:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TCIYM wrote: | | I don't know that anyone wanting Cooley moved could be considered a Redskins fan. |
Wow! This is coming from a person who is pretty consistent on posting negative stuff about the Redskins. |
|
| Back to top |
|
CanesSkins26 Canes Skin

Joined: 13 Aug 2007 Posts: 6870 Location: Alexandria, VA
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 10:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Jeremy81 wrote: | | KazooSkinsFan wrote: | | Jeremy81 wrote: | | I don't think locker or mallet will be available by the time we pick. I wouldn't mind waiting on qb until the second round. Maybe a guy like Andy Dalton and picking up a stud OL in the first or maybe a julio Jones. I just think the top 4 qbs will be gone by the time we pick |
There is very little chance we're going OL in the first round because we don't need an LT and anywhere else it's a stretch pick. The only way is if a very good RT is available, but that's in the long shot category. People like tossing out the go OL in the first round w/o analyzing what they are saying. A receiver is definitely possible though. I'm hoping we get a good 3-4 DL or LB. But drafting for position is a mistake we're not likely to make as Shanny is smart enough to avoid that trap, so it really depends who's there. |
i'm not suggesting we take another LT with our pick. we're not going to have a top ten pick. picking a great G or C with a pick in the teens is not all that obsurd. Iupati and pouncey were both picked in the teens. it's doesn't neccessarily have to be a RT. stefen wisniewski or rodney hudson could both be worth a mid round pick. to assume people don't analyze what they say because they make suggestions you don't agree with is a bit off base. my whole point was that our first round pick doesn't have to be taken on a qb. there will be good qbs available in the second round |
Have you looked at this year's draft class? OL is extremely weak this year. It's highly probable that no offensive lineman, including a LT, will go in the top 10. That is EXTREMELY rare. Drafting an OL, unless we trade down, at our position in the draft would be monumentally stupid when this draft is heavy at positions of need, especially qb and wr. |
|
| Back to top |
|
chiefhog44 **ch44

Joined: 26 Nov 2007 Posts: 2300 Location: Chicago
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 11:23 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Let's look at this.
Carolina - Picked Clausen last year
Denver - Has Orton AND Tebow
Buffalo - Luck doesn't drop any further from here.
Cincinnati - Palmer started playing very well once those bozo's we're out doubt they pick anyone up here.
Arizona - Would they trade down for McNabb??? Very interesting.
Cleveland - Mccoy
San Fran - Still have to think Smith is in there now that Singletary is out
Tenn - Owner wants Young
Dallas - Homo
Washington - Looking at a full deck of QB's at this position minue Luck. Could we trade up with Arizona for Mcnabb and #11, then up to 3 with Buffalo? Anybody know what the point's needed to trade from 5 to 3? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Red_One43 Hog
Joined: 16 Aug 2008 Posts: 4606 Location: D.C.
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 02, 2011 11:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| chiefhog44 wrote: | Let's look at this.
Carolina - Picked Clausen last year
Denver - Has Orton AND Tebow
Buffalo - Luck doesn't drop any further from here.
Cincinnati - Palmer started playing very well once those bozo's we're out doubt they pick anyone up here.
Arizona - Would they trade down for McNabb??? Very interesting.
Cleveland - Mccoy
San Fran - Still have to think Smith is in there now that Singletary is out
Tenn - Owner wants Young
Dallas - Homo
Washington - Looking at a full deck of QB's at this position minue Luck. Could we trade up with Arizona for Mcnabb and #11, then up to 3 with Buffalo? Anybody know what the point's needed to trade from 5 to 3? |
If the Cards think that Skelton is the QB of their future then it is plausible that the Cards could trade down in a trade that would include McNabb with McNabb holding the reins for Skelton, but I have no idea hwo they felt about Skelton's evaluation; however from what you posted it seems very likely that the QB Shanny wants might be available. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
| Page 2 of 5 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |