| Author |
Message |
crazyhorse1
ch1
Joined: 21 Mar 2005
Posts: 3558
Location: virginia beach
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 6:40 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Countertrey wrote: | mmmmmmmdunno... I'm a bit skittish about...
Auburn Quarterbacks....  |
Newton's more a Tebrow type of runner than a Vick, which means his running won't matter very much in the pro's; however, I think he's a much better passer than given credit for here. I think he has the potential to develop into a first class QB and think we should take a chance on him. I would grab him at 10 and be happy about it.
There's nobody out there who's both better and probably available. |
|
| Back to top |
|
SkinsJock
08 Champ
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11522
Location: New England
|
| Posted: Sat Jan 22, 2011 11:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| crazyhorse1 wrote: | | Countertrey wrote: | mmmmmmmdunno... I'm a bit skittish about...
Auburn Quarterbacks.... |
Newton's more a Tebrow type of runner than a Vick, which means his running won't matter very much in the pro's; however, I think he's a much better passer than given credit for here. I think he has the potential to develop into a first class QB and think we should take a chance on him. I would grab him at 10 and be happy about it.
There's nobody out there who's both better and probably available. |
that's good enough for me - IF CH1 thinks he's any good, that's the "kiss of death"' - DO NOT DRAFT this guy  |
|
| Back to top |
|
brad7686
B-rad
Joined: 26 Nov 2006
Posts: 2991
Location: De La War
|
| Posted: Sun Jan 23, 2011 12:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| crazyhorse1 wrote: | | Countertrey wrote: | mmmmmmmdunno... I'm a bit skittish about...
Auburn Quarterbacks.... |
Newton's more a Tebrow type of runner than a Vick, which means his running won't matter very much in the pro's; however, I think he's a much better passer than given credit for here. I think he has the potential to develop into a first class QB and think we should take a chance on him. I would grab him at 10 and be happy about it.
There's nobody out there who's both better and probably available. |
I don't know, Tebow was racking up a lot of yards running the ball this year. Newton would definitely pick up a lot on the ground. |
|
| Back to top |
|
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Posts: 7779
Location: NoVA
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 24, 2011 9:21 am Post subject: |
|
|
| If I were game planning for a game vs Denver, you can bet your last dollar that I'd have a spy on Tebow. He may not run a 4.2 40, but will burn you if you're not careful. |
|
| Back to top |
|
The Hogster
#######
Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 7002
Location: Washington D.C.
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 25, 2011 4:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Just say no to Cam. I'm not overly impressed with him. He's a dominant athlete, but I can't say that he's shown that he's a great Quarterback.
His physical skills are so superior to the collegiate kids, that it's hard to tell how good he can be when he cannot rely on that advantage (i.e. in the NFL).
I think Jake Locker or Ryan Mallet would suit our offense well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
| Page 2 of 2 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
