| Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements. |
| With the 10th pick in the 2011 NFL Draft, the Washington Redskins select: |
| JJ Watt, DE - WISC |
|
8% |
[ 1 ] |
| Tyron Smith, OT - USC |
|
8% |
[ 1 ] |
| Cam Newton, QB - AUB |
|
16% |
[ 2 ] |
| Julio Jones, WR - BAMA |
|
58% |
[ 7 ] |
| Nate Solder, OT - CU |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Cameron Jordan, DE - CAL |
|
8% |
[ 1 ] |
| Mark Ingram, RB - BAMA |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Corey Liuget, DT - ILL |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Aldon Smith, OLB - MIZZ |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
| Jimmy Smith, CB - CU |
|
0% |
[ 0 ] |
|
| Total Votes : 12 |
|
| Author |
Message |
bwhit33
newbie
Joined: 22 Mar 2011
Posts: 1
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 12:04 pm Post subject: MB GM Mock Draft has arrived... WAS OTC |
 |
|
Here's the jist of it: I'm bouncing from MB to MB in draft order giving each MB's team roughly 36 hours of polling before the player with the highest % of votes becomes the pick. Only players that havent been selected before your team's pick are available.
Its just an interesting way to mock the draft, and lets be honest who knows what their team needs the most than the diehard fans who troll MBs for hours at a time day in and day out? You can vote for who you want as a fan, who you think the team will take given their draft strategy or you can just take bpa... its up to you!
Without further ado...
Round 1
1 Carolina Panthers - Patrick Peterson, CB - LSU
http://www.carolinahuddle.com/forum/carolina-panthers/57533-poll-whos-going-at-1-a.html
2 Denver Broncos - Marcell Dareus, DT - BAMA
http://forums.denverbroncos.com/showthread.php?t=184858
3 Buffalo Bills - Nick Fairley, DT - AUB
http://forums.twobillsdrive.com/topic/127969-mb-gm-mock-draft-is-here/
4 Cincinnati Bengals - A.J. Green, WR - UGA
http://boards.bengals.com/showthread.php?t=79931
5 Arizona Cardinals - Von Miller, OLB - A&M
http://forums.azcardinals.com/showthread.php?t=55107
6 Cleveland Browns - Da'Quan Bowers, DE - CLEM
http://thebrownsboard.com/forums/index.php?showtopic=19166&st=
7 San Francisco 49ers - Robert Quinn, OLB - UNC
http://forums.49ers.com/messageboard/showthread.php?t=113836
8 Tennessee Titans - Blaine Gabbert, QB - MIZZ
http://www.gotitans.com/goForum/showthread.php?t=70168
9 Dallas Cowboys - Prince Amukamara, CB - NEB
http://www.truebluefanclub.com/socialnet/forums.cfm?plckForumPage=ForumDiscussion&plckDiscussionId=Cat%3a24d8e8bc-b132-4a6f-81fa-ab728a950ed1Forum%3a88e28c94-b7d5-47a7-a999-eed94a826affDiscussion%3a2b807258-8d6b-4a3d-8f5c-0606dc71861a"]
10 Washington Redskins - ON THE CLOCK
11 Houston Texans
12 Minnesota Vikings
13 Detroit Lions
14 St. Louis Rams
15 Miami Dolphins
16 Jacksonville Jaguars
17 New England Patriots
18 San Diego Chargers
19 New York Giants
20 Tampa Bay Buccaneers
21 Kansas City Chiefs
22 Indianapolis Colts
23 Philadelphia Eagles
24 New Orleans Saints
25 Seattle Seahawks
26 Baltimore Ravens
27 Atlanta Falcons
28 New England Patriots
29 Chicago Bears
30 New York Jets
31 Pittsburgh Steelers
32 Green Bay Packers |
|
| Back to top |
|
VetSkinsFan
One Step Away
Joined: 19 Jul 2007
Posts: 7779
Location: NoVA
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I voted for Jones, but if I had an alternate, it would be DT if he's worth it. |
|
| Back to top |
|
TCIYM
Hog
Joined: 10 Apr 2009
Posts: 441
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 1:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
It that's the board:
Who the Redskins would draft: Cam Newton
BPA: Julio Jones / Cam Jordan
Who I would take: Phil Taylor |
|
| Back to top |
|
chiefhog44
**ch44
Joined: 26 Nov 2007
Posts: 2300
Location: Chicago
|
| Posted: Fri Mar 25, 2011 11:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I think if Cam is there at 10, we will have trading partners |
|
| Back to top |
|
Countertrey
the 'mudge
Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 12771
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
First choice: Try to trade down. With these players still on the board, that is a good possibility.
Second Choice: Cam Jordan... can you say bookend? That would instantly take the Redskins pass defense to the next level... and, he wouldn't hurt run defense, either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
Red_One43
Hog
Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 4606
Location: D.C.
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 3:14 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TCIYM wrote: | It that's the board:
Who the Redskins would draft: Cam Newton
BPA: Julio Jones / Cam Jordan
Who I would take: Phil Taylor |
You Posted on Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:51 pm for the thread "Late Round Picks Request:"
| Quote: | | I don't think Phil Taylor is a legitimate #10, more like a #20 or a #25. |
| Quote: | | I like either Quinn or Jordan at #10, Taylor at #41 ... |
Quinn is off the boards according to the poll, so I understand why you aren't sticking with Quinn, but why the change over Jordan at #10 and why the change toward Taylor taking him at #10 as opposed to chancing it and waiting to #41? |
|
| Back to top |
|
TCIYM
Hog
Joined: 10 Apr 2009
Posts: 441
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Red_One43 wrote: | | TCIYM wrote: | It that's the board:
Who the Redskins would draft: Cam Newton
BPA: Julio Jones / Cam Jordan
Who I would take: Phil Taylor |
You Posted on Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:51 pm for the thread "Late Round Picks Request:"
| Quote: | | I don't think Phil Taylor is a legitimate #10, more like a #20 or a #25. |
| Quote: | | I like either Quinn or Jordan at #10, Taylor at #41 ... |
Quinn is off the boards according to the poll, so I understand why you aren't sticking with Quinn, but why the change over Jordan at #10 and why the change toward Taylor taking him at #10 as opposed to chancing it and waiting to #41? |
Phil Taylor is known to have at least eight teams lining him up for private workouts and is expected to be drafted around the 20th pick in the first round, if not earlier, making him unavailable at #41. While Jordan may be the BPA in this scenario, he does little for a 3-4 defensive line without a bona fide NT. Likewise, I can't assume a trade down is going to happen, or even that the Redskins plan on trading down. Therefore anyone I choose at #10 is likely going to be a reach and Taylor is the only bona fide NT in the first three rounds of the draft. Kenrick Ellis is a 3rd round prospect and guess which team lacks a 3rd round pick? Taylor has question marks but so does every other player the Redskins might draft at #10. Ten days ago Taylor was far less in demand and thought to be a 2nd round prospect, which might have left him available at #41. Now, not likely the case. What I really did here was ask myself: "What would Vinny Cerrato do?" And then, I did the opposite.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Red_One43
Hog
Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 4606
Location: D.C.
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 4:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| TCIYM wrote: | | Red_One43 wrote: | | TCIYM wrote: | It that's the board:
Who the Redskins would draft: Cam Newton
BPA: Julio Jones / Cam Jordan
Who I would take: Phil Taylor |
You Posted on Wed Mar 16, 2011 5:51 pm for the thread "Late Round Picks Request:"
| Quote: | | I don't think Phil Taylor is a legitimate #10, more like a #20 or a #25. |
| Quote: | | I like either Quinn or Jordan at #10, Taylor at #41 ... |
Quinn is off the boards according to the poll, so I understand why you aren't sticking with Quinn, but why the change over Jordan at #10 and why the change toward Taylor taking him at #10 as opposed to chancing it and waiting to #41? |
Phil Taylor is known to have at least eight teams lining him up for private workouts and is expected to be drafted around the 20th pick in the first round, if not earlier, making him unavailable at #41. While Jordan may be the BPA in this scenario, he does little for a 3-4 defensive line without a bona fide NT. Likewise, I can't assume a trade down is going to happen, or even that the Redskins plan on trading down. Therefore anyone I choose at #10 is likely going to be a reach and Taylor is the only bona fide NT in the first three rounds of the draft. Kenrick Ellis is a 3rd round prospect and guess which team lacks a 3rd round pick? Taylor has question marks but so does every other player the Redskins might draft at #10. Ten days ago Taylor was far less in demand and thought to be a 2nd round prospect, which might have left him available at #41. Now, not likely the case. What I really did here was ask myself: "What would Vinny Cerrato do?" And then, I did the opposite. |
I am with you on your thinking. I have been concerned that Taylor might not be available, so we might have to do a Jacksonville and pick our guy earlier. As most folks are saying Nose Tackle is the key to the 3-4. Taylor is the the real deal. Like most of us out there, I am hoping somehow some way we get to trade down. |
|
| Back to top |
|
CanesSkins26
Canes Skin
Joined: 13 Aug 2007
Posts: 6870
Location: Alexandria, VA
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 8:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
1. Cam Newton isn't falling to #10
2. The Skins are not drafting Taylor at #10 |
|
| Back to top |
|
Red_One43
Hog
Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 4606
Location: D.C.
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CanesSkins26 wrote: | 1. Cam Newton isn't falling to #10
2. The Skins are not drafting Taylor at #10 |
Ok, Cane. The odds are that you are right on both counts.
Newton isn't falling to #10
and if Julio Jones is available and nobody trades up, it would be hard to pass on him. I voted for Julio on this thread for two reasons - I believe that is who we will pick. The other is we have been clamoring about having a big receiver for years - a big receiver of his talent and speed doesn't ccme along very often - he is a missing piece that we long for and if we are on the two year plan then we got a piece that we won't need later.
The fantasy guy (not league just pure fantasy) in me wants Taylor and then Paea in the second round. Carriker is holding his own at the left end - this would give us a powerful front three that teams would have to reckon with - remember defense wins championships - Remember the Ravens Super Bowl squad? We would not be T-H-E-R-E yet next year with those two but we would be on our way to building a powerful D.
Who was your pick on this thread?
Last edited by Red_One43 on Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:40 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
Countertrey
the 'mudge
Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 12771
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Canes misses the point of the thread... |
|
| Back to top |
|
Red_One43
Hog
Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 4606
Location: D.C.
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 9:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Hmmm... no wonder why TCYIM gave all three angles
Redskins will pick-
BPA -
Personal pick -
He must have seen a Canes on the radar. 
Let me try it
Redskins - Julio Jones
BPA- Julio Jones
My Pick - Phil Taylor |
|
| Back to top |
|
1niksder
**********
Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 16578
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 10:40 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| CanesSkins26 wrote: | 1. Cam Newton isn't falling to #10
2. The Skins are not drafting Taylor at #10 |
I believe this, but wouldn't be surprised if both of them are on the board at #11
I want Julio Jones drafted at #10 but not by Washington. The word on Taylor is "boom or bust, the later he's picked the better he'll be"... (something about might not love the game but loves the money he can make)...
I hope Taylor is there at #41 but if they can't trade down in the first and get two additional 2011 top 120 picks then they should take Jones at #10 and either Dalton, Devlin, or Ponder (in that order) at #41. They can sign someone like Brandon Mebane from Seattle once the new CBA is worked out and free agency starts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Red_One43
Hog
Joined: 16 Aug 2008
Posts: 4606
Location: D.C.
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 26, 2011 11:06 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 1niksder wrote: | | CanesSkins26 wrote: | 1. Cam Newton isn't falling to #10
2. The Skins are not drafting Taylor at #10 |
I believe this, but wouldn't be surprised if both of them are on the board at #11 |
| Quote: | | I want Julio Jones drafted at #10 but not by Washington. The word on Taylor is "boom or bust, the later he's picked the better he'll be"... (something about might not love the game but loves the money he can make)... |
Sounds like someone else on our roster who was suspended for the last four games.
| Quote: | | I hope Taylor is there at #41 but if they can't trade down in the first and get two additional 2011 top 120 picks then they should take Jones at #10 and either Dalton, Devlin, or Ponder (in that order) at #41. They can sign someone like Brandon Mebane from Seattle once the new CBA is worked out and free agency starts. |
Thanks for the info on Taylor - I will do more homework on him to make sure that he is my guy at #10 on draft day. If during the weeks leading up to the draft, I decide I want Julio Jones (speaking as a fanatsy Coach/GM) at 10 and Taylor is not there at 41, I lean toward QB - Dalton is my man at 41 at QB in that case.
Are you looking a Mebane at nose or end? |
|
| Back to top |
|
TCIYM
Hog
Joined: 10 Apr 2009
Posts: 441
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 27, 2011 8:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 1niksder wrote: | | CanesSkins26 wrote: | 1. Cam Newton isn't falling to #10
2. The Skins are not drafting Taylor at #10 |
I believe this, but wouldn't be surprised if both of them are on the board at #11
I want Julio Jones drafted at #10 but not by Washington. The word on Taylor is "boom or bust, the later he's picked the better he'll be"... (something about might not love the game but loves the money he can make)...
I hope Taylor is there at #41 but if they can't trade down in the first and get two additional 2011 top 120 picks then they should take Jones at #10 and either Dalton, Devlin, or Ponder (in that order) at #41. They can sign someone like Brandon Mebane from Seattle once the new CBA is worked out and free agency starts. |
I like Wes Bunting but I wouldn't take his opinion of a player as gospel any more than I would take Evan Silva's or Mike Florio's. The truth about most players is the median of the best scouting review and the worst one. Average would be a step up from the NT play of last season. Does that justify a #10 pick? Probably not but neither does a wide receiver without a quarterback, nor a defensive end with a nose tackle. Building from the outside in is how this team got into this mess. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
| Page 1 of 3 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
|
