| Author |
Message |
SouthLondonRedskin
Hog
Joined: 09 Jan 2012
Posts: 1113
Location: South London, UK
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 4:01 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| Countertrey wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | SouthLondonRedskin wrote: | | Countertrey wrote: | | Southlondonredskin broke my anagram generator... bastage. |
I DID NOT!!!
I didn't even touch it. You shouldn't leave it laying around anyway... |
Who's butchering the language? |
That's what I'm talkin' bout! |
FFS!
I actually went with laying rather than lying as that's the popular version and I thought you'd all get hot under the collar thinking it was wrong if i went that way, and I couldn't be bothered explaining it all at 2am quite frankly!!!
I take my hat off to you and will treat you with the respect you clearly deserve from now on.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14712
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 7:17 am Post subject: |
|
|
| FFS? |
|
| Back to top |
|
SouthLondonRedskin
Hog
Joined: 09 Jan 2012
Posts: 1113
Location: South London, UK
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 8:49 am Post subject: |
|
|
For Fecks Sake.
Or something similar....
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14712
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SouthLondonRedskin wrote: |
For Feck's Sake. |
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
Countertrey
the 'mudge
Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 12767
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 12:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | SouthLondonRedskin wrote: |
For Feck's Sake. |
|
DS... I think this is a completely uphill battle... |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
Mud-n-Cleats
newbie
Joined: 24 Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Location: Western PA
|
|
| Back to top |
|
SouthLondonRedskin
Hog
Joined: 09 Jan 2012
Posts: 1113
Location: South London, UK
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 1:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Countertrey wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | SouthLondonRedskin wrote: |
For Feck's Sake. |
|
DS... I think this is a completely uphill battle... |
I don't know what you mean by that exactly but I'm gonna take that as a compliment!
|
|
| Back to top |
|
Countertrey
the 'mudge
Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 12767
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 3:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well... then...
You're welcome?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
redskinsflow
newbie
Joined: 23 Mar 2012
Posts: 15
|
| Posted: Sat Mar 24, 2012 8:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It was a lot to give up but RGIII is one for the future! |
|
| Back to top |
|
Mud-n-Cleats
newbie
Joined: 24 Mar 2012
Posts: 2
Location: Western PA
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| redskinsflow wrote: | | It was a lot to give up but RGIII is one for the future! |
If he does become the future of the NFL then Shanny and Snyder will look like a pair of brilliant minds! |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
1niksder
**********
Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 16578
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mud-n-Cleats wrote: | | redskinsflow wrote: | | It was a lot to give up but RGIII is one for the future! |
If he does become the future of the NFL then Shanny and Snyder will look like a pair of brilliant minds! |
+1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
markshark84
Hog
Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 1460
Location: Houston, TX
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 4:11 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Mud-n-Cleats wrote: | | redskinsflow wrote: | | It was a lot to give up but RGIII is one for the future! |
If he does become the future of the NFL then Shanny and Snyder will look like a pair of brilliant minds! |
And if it doesn't -- Shanny will be out on the street with Allen and the Skins won't have the ability to draft an adequate replacement until 2015. Meanwhile Snyder will just continue looking like the dumbest owner in the NFL........ |
|
| Back to top |
|
SkinsJock
08 Champ
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11514
Location: New England
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I thought it was going to cost more 
and
I think that is part of the reason Mike Holmgren is upset about this deal - he knows it was a great deal and they should have made the deal
Great deal for the Redskins and hopefully the Rams can have the picks help them out too
There is NO WAY that the players that we might have drafted would have helped this franchise over the next 10 PLUS years like one of these 2 QBs will
this is going to go down as one of the great trades in NFL history |
|
| Back to top |
|
Countertrey
the 'mudge
Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 12767
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SkinsJock wrote: | I thought it was going to cost more
and
I think that is part of the reason Mike Holmgren is upset about this deal - he knows it was a great deal and they should have made the deal
Great deal for the Redskins and hopefully the Rams can have the picks help them out too
There is NO WAY that the players that we might have drafted would have helped this franchise over the next 10 PLUS years like one of these 2 QBs will
this is going to go down as one of the great trades in NFL history |
That's probably it, exactly... He blew it. The Rams asked teams for their best offer. The Redskins played it straight up, and made the offer. The Browns played it cute, and tried to guess the Redskins offer, instead of making their best offer. The Rams didn't play that... and dealt with the skins. Holmgren knows that it's a good deal... and wishes he could get a do-over, for that reason. |
|
| Back to top |
|
skinsfan#33
#33
Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 3875
|
| Posted: Sun Mar 25, 2012 6:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Paul Campbell can eat the corn out of my . "Worst owner in the NFL", yeah right. I get trired of hearing this but Snyder isn't even close! Even at his worst he was still better than many.
He doesn't even know that Gaffney is on the team. How can he say the team has no WRs then forget about the leading receiver. Trust me WR won't be a problem next year and the need for better WRs has overstated! How can you judge our WRs with Beck and Grossman throwing them passes?
He is the first that I have seen that had anything negative to say about RG3s play! His delivery hurts his accuracy. Really? Maybe if he had an "better delivery" he would have hit 80% of his passes.
What a tool! |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
| Page 11 of 12 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
