| Author |
Message |
aswas71788
Hog
Joined: 27 Apr 2005
Posts: 1004
Location: Palm Springs, CA
|
| Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 9:14 pm Post subject: London Fletcher... Finally |
 |
|
According to The Redskins official site, London Fletcher was voted number 87 on the top 100 players list. Congratulations..well deserved!
    |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14716
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 11:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Should be higher. |
|
| Back to top |
|
THEPosse2.0
newbie
Joined: 03 May 2012
Posts: 3
Location: virginia beach, va
|
| Posted: Thu May 03, 2012 11:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| most def should be HIGHER!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
jmooney
Hog
Joined: 22 Jul 2007
Posts: 439
Location: Hagerstown ,Md.
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:13 am Post subject: Re: London Fletcher... Finally |
|
|
| aswas71788 wrote: | According to The Redskins official site, London Fletcher was voted number 87 on the top 100 players list. Congratulations..well deserved!
|
VOTED? Who are these voters?
If London were on a team like the Steelers or Cowboys, and his stats were exactly the same. He would be top 10. Bunch of hater clowns!
I'm glad he made the list but, still not the respect he deserves. |
|
| Back to top |
|
SouthLondonRedskin
Hog
Joined: 09 Jan 2012
Posts: 1113
Location: South London, UK
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 2:49 am Post subject: Re: London Fletcher... Finally |
|
|
| jmooney wrote: | | aswas71788 wrote: | According to The Redskins official site, London Fletcher was voted number 87 on the top 100 players list. Congratulations..well deserved!
|
VOTED? Who are these voters?
If London were on a team like the Steelers or Cowboys, and his stats were exactly the same. He would be top 10. Bunch of hater clowns!
I'm glad he made the list but, still not the respect he deserves. |
His stock will rise significantly if the next and last couple of years of his career coincide with a Redskins revival.
Success sticks in the mind, people will start talking about the Redskins again if we're competing for the division and making the playoffs. They will then look to the reasons why and suddenly everyone will be saying how much they've always loved London Fletcher..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14716
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 7:49 am Post subject: Re: London Fletcher... Finally |
|
|
| SouthLondonRedskin wrote: | | jmooney wrote: | | aswas71788 wrote: | According to The Redskins official site, London Fletcher was voted number 87 on the top 100 players list. Congratulations..well deserved!
|
VOTED? Who are these voters?
If London were on a team like the Steelers or Cowboys, and his stats were exactly the same. He would be top 10. Bunch of hater clowns!
I'm glad he made the list but, still not the respect he deserves. |
His stock will rise significantly if the next and last couple of years of his career coincide with a Redskins revival.
Success sticks in the mind, people will start talking about the Redskins again if we're competing for the division and making the playoffs. They will then look to the reasons why and suddenly everyone will be saying how much they've always loved London Fletcher..... |
+1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3205
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 8:10 am Post subject: Re: London Fletcher... Finally |
|
|
| jmooney wrote: | | aswas71788 wrote: | According to The Redskins official site, London Fletcher was voted number 87 on the top 100 players list. Congratulations..well deserved!
|
VOTED? Who are these voters?
|
The NFL players:
Link for various players - Top 100 2012
Link for Fletch - Fletch
DarthMonk |
|
| Back to top |
|
Skinsfan55
+++++++++
Joined: 04 Feb 2004
Posts: 5261
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 8:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
Can't we just appreciate London for who he is without the hyperbole?
He is a two time pro bowler with a Super Bowl ring (1999, St Louis Rams). Sure, he's a little under appreciated, but he's a very, very good player... just not great. |
|
| Back to top |
|
riggofan
Hog
Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 2942
Location: Montclair, Virginia
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 9:32 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Skinsfan55 wrote: | Can't we just appreciate London for who he is without the hyperbole?
He is a two time pro bowler with a Super Bowl ring (1999, St Louis Rams). Sure, he's a little under appreciated, but he's a very, very good player... just not great. |
In a weird twist, he's also widely acknowledged for being under appreciated.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
SkinsJock
08 Champ
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11514
Location: New England
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 9:56 am Post subject: |
|
|
London Fletcher is widely recognized by both his peers and by many fans as being a VERY good NFL player
Recognition by others AND especially the Pro Bowl voters is NOT at all important - being voted into the Pro Bowl should not carry ANY significance at all - this is a stupid popularity contest and means SQUAT
some players are recognized as being that special they can single handedly make a difference when they are playing
London Fletcher is that type of player - our defense needs him
London Fletcher will continue to help this franchise on the field and off
this is a HOF player - enough said |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
 |
riggofan
Hog
Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 2942
Location: Montclair, Virginia
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 10:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SkinsJock wrote: | London Fletcher is widely recognized by both his peers and by many fans as being a VERY good NFL player
Recognition by others AND especially the Pro Bowl voters is NOT at all important - being voted into the Pro Bowl should not carry ANY significance at all - this is a stupid popularity contest and means SQUAT |
Weird, but I completely agree with you, SJ.
With all of this talk about getting rid of the Pro Bowl next year, I hope the NFL still has some sort of All Star system. Preferably without fan voting. I think its still cool to acknowledge those guys who killed it during the year, especially if they aren't on winning team. |
|
| Back to top |
|
tribeofjudah
tribe
Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 5996
Location: SURF CITY, HB, CALI *** Occasionally flying into a SUPERNOVA
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 11:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | Should be higher. |
should be LOWER....cuz that would be closer to #1 |
|
| Back to top |
|
SkinsJock
08 Champ
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11514
Location: New England
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 11:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| riggofan wrote: | | .. With all of this talk about getting rid of the Pro Bowl next year, I hope the NFL still has some sort of All Star system. Preferably without fan voting. I think its still cool to acknowledge those guys who killed it during the year, especially if they aren't on winning team. |
agree with this - there needs to be a better way of 'recognizing' and making known the players that made a difference by their play
there has to be a better way
FOR A START - ANY form of player evaluation should NOT include anyone that kept players out of the HOF that clearly belong there 
THEY clearly do not have the ability to see what is going on between the lines  |
|
| Back to top |
|
The Hogster
#######
Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 7002
Location: Washington D.C.
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| tribeofjudah wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | Should be higher. |
should be LOWER....cuz that would be closer to #1 |
LOL
True.....true |
|
| Back to top |
|
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3205
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2012 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| The Hogster wrote: | | tribeofjudah wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | Should be higher. |
should be LOWER....cuz that would be closer to #1 |
LOL
True.....true |
All depends.
When we write lists 1 is usually at the top, i.e., higher.
OTOH, 1 has a lower numerical value than 100.
Whateva.
DarthMonk |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
| Page 1 of 2 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
