Which of our receiving corps will have the biggest year?
34 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3
- The Hogster
- Posts: 7225
- Joined: Sun Mar 06, 2005 9:13 pm
- Location: Washington D.C.
by The Hogster » Wed May 09, 2012 5:51 pm
It is rare for a player to remain with a team for a decade. 
ey is going into his 9th year. It would not surprise me to see him depart, but I'd like to see what he has this season at least.
ey is going into his 9th year. It would not surprise me to see him depart, but I'd like to see what he has this season at least.SPIT HAPPENS!!
___________________________
___________________________
by Irn-Bru » Wed May 09, 2012 6:42 pm
It's hard for me to believe that whoever our #1 WR is won't lead the team in yards. Best odds are on Garcon but Josh Morgan could surprise.
When it comes to TDs, I could see Fred Davis leading the team.
When it comes to TDs, I could see Fred Davis leading the team.
"I’m never under the assumption that you draft for need. You draft the best available football player on the board. ... Because, in the long run, they are the ones who will help you win the most games." - Scot McCloughan
by SkinsJock » Thu May 10, 2012 8:06 am
Irn-Bru wrote:It's hard for me to believe that whoever our #1 WR is won't lead the team in yards. Best odds are on Garcon but Josh Morgan could surprise.
When it comes to TDs, I could see Fred Davis leading the team.
I'd agree FFA - I think that Moss, Hankerson, Garcon and Morgan will get a lot of yards because of that arm
I just feel that the TEs and backs plus RGIII will keep the chains moving - these guys will become his goto players
RGIII's ability to get yardage on the ground is going to give DCs a fit - he can get 4 yards almost anytime he wants
a 3rd and 3 or 4 is not going to be a big deal with this kid 'running' the offense
P A T I E N C E - it's going to take time - Snyder just needs to give Scot McCloughan the authority to bring in the right players and coaches, they don't need to be 'the best available' - PLUS we need more accountability
- Chris Luva Luva
- Posts: 18582
- Joined: Mon Jul 28, 2003 12:55 pm
- Location: AJT
by Chris Luva Luva » Thu May 10, 2012 9:14 am
Our WR's have been worthless in the redzone since, well forever. Why?
1. Body-type
2. Ball placement
Ball placement makes body-type less of an issue. RGIII thus far has shown that he acknowledges the importance of ball placement (throwing a WR open) and has the ability to command his passes.
In the past, our TE's have been the only source of TD revenue in games. I expect to see more fade passes and back shoulder throws. I'm standing firm in my belief that a WR (my choice is Hank) will have a big year.
1. Body-type
2. Ball placement
Ball placement makes body-type less of an issue. RGIII thus far has shown that he acknowledges the importance of ball placement (throwing a WR open) and has the ability to command his passes.
In the past, our TE's have been the only source of TD revenue in games. I expect to see more fade passes and back shoulder throws. I'm standing firm in my belief that a WR (my choice is Hank) will have a big year.
Fios - Arbiter of All Positive Knowledge
Kaz - "Was kinda obvious since we all know you're not a moron"
Kaz - "Was kinda obvious since we all know you're not a moron"
34 posts
• Page 3 of 3 • 1, 2, 3