| Author |
Message |
Redskin in Canada
~~~~~~
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 10286
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:22 pm Post subject: Rumour Mill: Hankerson & Cooley |
 |
|
So, take it with a grain of salt. BUT ... rumour has it that
1) Hankerson will not be ready to start this season. Worse, there seem to be indications that he may not heal fully to play without risk of serious re-injury.
2) Cooley, it seems as if that nagging injury is not going away either.
Hankerson definitely might be out but Cooley's health situation (and his cap number) are still under consideration.
Of course, I do not have a link. So, do not ask for one. 
You know that I would not post this if I had not had at least a credible source (but no independent confirmation). Please do not ask for it either.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 8966
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 12:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Will be interesting and can change the roster quite a bit if Hank isn't healthy. If Cooley can't go, that'll leave room for Paulsen as well or one of the other guys we brought in. Have no question in my mind that Paul will be on the 53. Shanny loves his skillset. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Countertrey
the 'mudge
Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 12784
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:21 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| This certainly suggests that Hankerson's injury was more than a torn labrum...as they had reported... |
|
| Back to top |
|
Skeletor
Hog
Joined: 23 Mar 2004
Posts: 692
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:36 pm Post subject: Re: Rumour Mill: Hankerson & Cooley |
|
|
| Redskin in Canada wrote: |
Hankerson definitely might be out |
as long as you are absolutely sort of positively but not quite sure about this... |
|
| Back to top |
|
skinsfan#33
#33
Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 3876
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:47 pm Post subject: Re: Rumour Mill: Hankerson & Cooley |
|
|
| Redskin in Canada wrote: | So, take it with a grain of salt. BUT ... rumour has it that
1) Hankerson will not be ready to start this season. Worse, there seem to be indications that he may not heal fully to play without risk of serious re-injury.
2) Cooley, it seems as if that nagging injury is not going away either.
Hankerson definitely might be out but Cooley's health situation (and his cap number) are still under consideration.
Of course, I do not have a link. So, do not ask for one.
You know that I would not post this if I had not had at least a credible source (but no independent confirmation). Please do not ask for it either. |
The Cooley thing is news to me. Every report I have heard on him is he feels better than he has felt in years.
The Hankerson thing was expected. He was still on crutches like a month ago. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
andyjens89
Hog
Joined: 21 Mar 2004
Posts: 1894
Location: Michigan
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 1:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| I could see them starting the year on PUP and coming in after week 6. Davis will be fine at TE and we have enough WR to cover the Hankerson injury for the time being. |
|
| Back to top |
|
tribeofjudah
tribe
Joined: 15 Jun 2007
Posts: 5998
Location: SURF CITY, HB, CALI *** Occasionally flying into a SUPERNOVA
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 3:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| It makes me think that the Hankerson thing may have been a BUST move... |
|
| Back to top |
|
Redskin in Canada
~~~~~~
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 10286
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:01 pm Post subject: Re: Rumour Mill: Hankerson & Cooley |
|
|
| Skeletor wrote: | | Redskin in Canada wrote: |
Hankerson definitely might be out |
as long as you are absolutely sort of positively but not quite sure about this... |
You are right. No independent confirmation yet. It will come after training camp starts in a few days. |
|
| Back to top |
|
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 8966
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 5:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| tribeofjudah wrote: | | It makes me think that the Hankerson thing may have been a BUST move... |
Can't say it's a bust because in the one season he's played and saw significant snaps, he was proactive.
Now, if you're speaking about avoiding surgery, that's not a bust move - it just didn't work. Anytime you open the body up and do a procedure, your likelihood of recovery is lessened. Now, if it's an injury that requires surgery then that's what you have to do (ex: ACL). In his situation, he went to the best Dr. and they said hold off. They did and it didn't work. He had surgery and now it appears they are constantly evaluating him and being safe. It's good that they're doing that. Last thing we need to do is have another Malcolm Kelly situation on our hands where we rush him back on the field and he get's hurt again. The kid is talented and lets make sure he gets healthy before he's on the field. He's a vital tool to our future success. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Chris Luva Luva
---
Joined: 28 Jul 2003
Posts: 17816
Location: AJT
|
| Posted: Thu Jul 12, 2012 6:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Terrible news, but I'll hold out hope. Mike said that the kid could have participated during mini-camp, so unless he re-injured himself, I don't see the need to mislead us about his availability. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
riggofan
Hog
Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 2957
Location: Montclair, Virginia
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 9:26 am Post subject: Re: Rumour Mill: Hankerson & Cooley |
|
|
| Redskin in Canada wrote: | | Skeletor wrote: | | Redskin in Canada wrote: |
Hankerson definitely might be out |
as long as you are absolutely sort of positively but not quite sure about this... |
You are right. No independent confirmation yet. It will come after training camp starts in a few days. |
Wow! I have no idea where you're getting your information but I will be impressed if you're right.
Bummer if its true though. I wouldn't be entirely surprised or concerned about Hankerson. But it would be really bad news for Cooley IMO. |
|
| Back to top |
|
ATX_Skins
ATX
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 3325
Location: NOVA
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 12:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Both are non factors anyways. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Chris Luva Luva
---
Joined: 28 Jul 2003
Posts: 17816
Location: AJT
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 5:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ATX_Skins wrote: | | Both are non factors anyways. |
That's a stupid stance to take on it.
Using that train of "thought", Jarvis Jenkins would be a non-factor for the 2012 season if he got injured, right? 
This is a main reason why I support players getting paid whenever they can. |
|
| Back to top |
|
ATX_Skins
ATX
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 3325
Location: NOVA
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 6:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Chris Luva Luva wrote: | | ATX_Skins wrote: | | Both are non factors anyways. |
That's a stupid stance to take on it.
Using that train of "thought", Jarvis Jenkins would be a non-factor for the 2012 season if he got injured, right?
This is a main reason why I support players getting paid whenever they can. |
It's not stupid if I didnt expect them to do much when healthy anyways. This has nothing to do with Jenkins.
Cooley has been banged up for a while, Hankerson didnt play when healthy. |
|
| Back to top |
|
frankcal20
^^^^^^^
Joined: 24 Mar 2004
Posts: 8966
|
| Posted: Fri Jul 13, 2012 11:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| He was a rookie who was considered to be Raw coming in. So, the first real opportunity he had, he got over 100 yds receiving vs a VERY good Miami 2ndary. Unfortunately he got hurt in the same game. Too bad. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
| Page 1 of 13 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
