Washington Redskins Message Board
Visit the THN Website 
Washington Redskins Fan Forum spacer Washington Redskins Message Board
Home Login Register Rules FAQ Photo Galleries Thu May 23, 2013 4:10 am
Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements.
   TheHogs.net Forum Index » Hog Wash - Washington Redskins Football

 » Brandon Banks - The Wide Receiver

All times are GMT - 5 Hours 
Post new topic   Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next  
Author Message
riggofan
Hog


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 2942
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:07 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DarthMonk wrote:
I'd call the kickoff fundamental.


meh. Kickoffs account for 6% of the plays during a game. The past two years only 50% of them are actually returned.

There's no question that the kickoff is fundamental. The question is: is it really essential?

If the league decided that cutting out the kickoff would really reduce the number of spinal injuries, concussions, etc;, I wouldn't cry about it. And you certainly can't blame a guy like Greg Schiano for wanting to do something about it considering what happened to Eric LeGrand. I think people are a little too guick to get all grumpy-old-man-get-off-my-lawn.
Back to top
FLWSkin
piggie


Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 189
Location: St. Robert, MO

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Not to be too grumpy, but someone could get paralysed on any play. If everyone is that worried about it, eliminate football all together.
Back to top
riggofan
Hog


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 2942
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FLWSkin wrote:
Not to be too grumpy, but someone could get paralysed on any play. If everyone is that worried about it, eliminate football all together.


What kind of logic is that? People still die in car accidents, so why wear seat belts at all? Come on, man.

Kickoffs account for 6% of all NFL plays, but they account for 17% of all those most serious injuries. That's ridiculously disproportionate. If you can cut down the risk of somebody getting paralysed by 20% with minimal impact on the game, you don't think that is worth at least considering with an open mind?
Back to top
FLWSkin
piggie


Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 189
Location: St. Robert, MO

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 12:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its perfect logic. The NFL is doing all this to eliminate lawsuits by former players because of concussions. If you don't want any football related injuries, ban football. Or, if you want the money, fame and stuff that goes with football, admit it is going to ruin you physically and just take the money and accept it or don't play. To me, everything else, like eliminating kickoffs, is just dancing around the obvious.
Back to top
riggofan
Hog


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 2942
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:01 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

FLWSkin wrote:
Its perfect logic. The NFL is doing all this to eliminate lawsuits by former players because of concussions. If you don't want any football related injuries, ban football. Or, if you want the money, fame and stuff that goes with football, admit it is going to ruin you physically and just take the money and accept it or don't play. To me, everything else, like eliminating kickoffs, is just dancing around the obvious.


Sounds like a realistic plan.
Back to top
Link
361259_Primer Wireless Headset
FLWSkin
piggie


Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 189
Location: St. Robert, MO

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:11 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Perfectly realistic to me.
Back to top
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ


Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11514
Location: New England

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Shocked WOW! ... just boggles the mind Shocked
Back to top
FLWSkin
piggie


Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 189
Location: St. Robert, MO

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

What in what I have said boggles your mind? Players bitch about safety and then you get guys launching themsevles head first into RGIII's head like the Falcon game, the Eagle game and last weeks Raven game. They obviously dont' care about safety, every time it is mentioned they say how weak the game is becoming because of safety concerns, but then they want to sue the league later after they've blown all their money and say someone should have made the game safer. My points are pretty clear and easy to look up if you desire.
Back to top
riggofan
Hog


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 2942
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:24 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

SkinsJock wrote:
Shocked WOW! ... just boggles the mind Shocked


LOL. I think I'm done with this one. Smile
Back to top
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ


Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11514
Location: New England

Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

I don't blame you

I'm like Brandon Banks - I'm outa here Laughing
Back to top
Link
522682_Modells.com! Your Online Store for Licensed Apparel!  Click Here!
skinsfan#33
#33
#33


Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 3875

Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 6:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

riggofan wrote:
FLWSkin wrote:
Not to be too grumpy, but someone could get paralysed on any play. If everyone is that worried about it, eliminate football all together.


What kind of logic is that? People still die in car accidents, so why wear seat belts at all? Come on, man.

Kickoffs account for 6% of all NFL plays, but they account for 17% of all those most serious injuries. That's ridiculously disproportionate. If you can cut down the risk of somebody getting paralysed by 20% with minimal impact on the game, you don't think that is worth at least considering with an open mind?

Link please for your stats!

I haven't been able to find ANY stats that show that the KO is a statistically higher injury rate. Not saying you pulled that out of the air (or under your seat), but I haven't been able to find any.
Back to top
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
DarthMonk


Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3205

Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:02 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

skinsfan#33 wrote:
riggofan wrote:
FLWSkin wrote:
Not to be too grumpy, but someone could get paralysed on any play. If everyone is that worried about it, eliminate football all together.


What kind of logic is that? People still die in car accidents, so why wear seat belts at all? Come on, man.

Kickoffs account for 6% of all NFL plays, but they account for 17% of all those most serious injuries. That's ridiculously disproportionate. If you can cut down the risk of somebody getting paralysed by 20% with minimal impact on the game, you don't think that is worth at least considering with an open mind?

Link please for your stats!

I haven't been able to find ANY stats that show that the KO is a statistically higher injury rate. Not saying you pulled that out of the air (or under your seat), but I haven't been able to find any.


Me neither. I'm trying to remember a guy getting concussed on a KO.

http://www.advancednflstats.com/2011/09/will-new-kickoff-rules-really-reduce.html

Excerpt:

Further, looking back at the graph above, it appears that over the past few years, injury rates on kickoffs are in line with those on run and pass plays. In fact, in 2008 and 2009 the kickoff injury rates were lower than for typical scrimmage plays. Getting rid of the two-minute warning in the first half, a gimmick that only allows extra commercials, would have a similar injury-reducing effect just by reducing the number of pass and run plays.

DarthMonk
Back to top
Deadskins
JSPB22
JSPB22


Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14716
Location: Location, LOCATION!

Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

DarthMonk wrote:
Getting rid of the two-minute warning in the first half, a gimmick that only allows extra commercials, would have a similar injury-reducing effect just by reducing the number of pass and run plays.

Are guys getting injured during commercials now?
Back to top
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
DarthMonk


Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3205

Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 7:18 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Deadskins wrote:
DarthMonk wrote:
Getting rid of the two-minute warning in the first half, a gimmick that only allows extra commercials, would have a similar injury-reducing effect just by reducing the number of pass and run plays.

Are guys getting injured during commercials now?


I was quoting an article. I think without the two minute warning fewer plays are run. It's an extra time out. It amounts to a few hundred plays a year.
Back to top
ATX_Skins
ATX
ATX


Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 3322
Location: NOVA

Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:23 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

As promised, I am once again bringing this thread back.

I don't think we will ever see him again.
Back to top
Link
THN's Redskins Fan Shop
Page 9 of 10All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Post new topic   Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next  



Home Login Register FAQ Search Photo Galleries Wireless Version
Copyright © 2000-2009 www.thehogs.net ( THN ). All Rights Reserved.Powered by php BB