| Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements. |
| Author |
Message |
SkinsJock
08 Champ
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11521
Location: New England
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:03 am Post subject: |
 |
|
 let it go, please |
|
| Back to top |
|
1niksder
**********
Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 16578
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SkinsJock wrote: | | let it go, please |
That's what he's been saying... "let him go" he didn't say please though.
He bumps the tread but doesn't add anything to it, that not like ATX but then I figured it out... he's doing to this thread what he says Banks does for the Redskins.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
riggofan
Hog
Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 2949
Location: Montclair, Virginia
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| DarthMonk wrote: | | skinsfan#33 wrote: | | I haven't been able to find ANY stats that show that the KO is a statistically higher injury rate. Not saying you pulled that out of the air (or under your seat), but I haven't been able to find any. |
Me neither. I'm trying to remember a guy getting concussed on a KO. |
Hey sorry guys I missed your posts asking where I got those stats. Here is the link from nfl.com:
http://www.nfl.com/news/story/0ap1000000107256/article/greg-schiano-explains-idea-on-replacing-nfl-kickoffs
| Quote: | Schiano's idea wasn't one that came off the top of his head. He researched it during his tenure at Rutgers. He was coaching the Scarlet Knights when one of his players, Eric LeGrand, suffered a severe spinal injury on a kickoff in 2010.
"One of the things that when I was researching, I think it was like, in the old kickoff rules, 17 percent of the catastrophic injuries happened on kickoffs, yet it's only about 6 percent of the plays in the game," Schiano said. "Well, that is disproportionate. Things like that are the reasons that led me there, but obviously it's a personal thing with me because of Eric LeGrand." |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
ATX_Skins
ATX
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 3322
Location: NOVA
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 1niksder wrote: | | SkinsJock wrote: | | let it go, please |
That's what he's been saying... "let him go" he didn't say please though.
He bumps the tread but doesn't add anything to it, that not like ATX but then I figured it out... he's doing to this thread what he says Banks does for the Redskins. |
Fine...
The absence of Brandon Banks IMO has drastically helped the team. Crawford and Paul are doing just fine back there. Our special teams is playing great on both sides. Danny Smith WAS NOT the issue, Brandon Banks was. Considering I was probably the most outspoken board member in regards to getting rid of Banks, I feel as though it was appropriate to bring it up again, and again. Call it gloating because I am as well  |
|
| Back to top |
|
skinsfan#33
#33
Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 3875
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:12 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ATX_Skins wrote: | | 1niksder wrote: | | SkinsJock wrote: | | let it go, please |
That's what he's been saying... "let him go" he didn't say please though.
He bumps the tread but doesn't add anything to it, that not like ATX but then I figured it out... he's doing to this thread what he says Banks does for the Redskins. |
Fine...
The absence of Brandon Banks IMO has drastically helped the team. Crawford and Paul are doing just fine back there. Our special teams is playing great on both sides. Danny Smith WAS NOT the issue, Brandon Banks was. Considering I was probably the most outspoken board member in regards to getting rid of Banks, I feel as though it was appropriate to bring it up again, and again. Call it gloating because I am as well |
other than that one return that was blocked outstanding, I see nothing different. What do you consider "drastically"? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3207
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 8:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| skinsfan#33 wrote: | | ATX_Skins wrote: | | 1niksder wrote: | | SkinsJock wrote: | | let it go, please |
That's what he's been saying... "let him go" he didn't say please though.
He bumps the tread but doesn't add anything to it, that not like ATX but then I figured it out... he's doing to this thread what he says Banks does for the Redskins. |
Fine...
The absence of Brandon Banks IMO has drastically helped the team. Crawford and Paul are doing just fine back there. Our special teams is playing great on both sides. Danny Smith WAS NOT the issue, Brandon Banks was. Considering I was probably the most outspoken board member in regards to getting rid of Banks, I feel as though it was appropriate to bring it up again, and again. Call it gloating because I am as well |
other than that one return that was blocked outstanding, I see nothing different. What do you consider "drastically"? |
Maybe this:
BB in 2012:
26 PRs, 6.7 avg.
Last 2 Weeks:
5 PRs, 23.6 avg.
Subtract the TD and it's 4 PRs for a 13.6 avg.
There is also the obvious decision making on KR. |
|
| Back to top |
|
rskin72
Hog
Joined: 11 Mar 2012
Posts: 283
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
While I am not a bb hater......i have just never seen his value displayed in meaningful games in the past two seasons. He is speedy, but he does not appear to me to be a playmaker for us. Crawford on pr's, so far, has been better than bb this season. Paul we could argue about, but paul can play te and make an impact whereas bb does not make an impact at wr.
Think bb will be gone next season..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14722
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 18, 2012 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| rskin72 wrote: | | but paul can play te |
Really? When's he gonna start showing it?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
SkinsJock
08 Champ
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11521
Location: New England
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 9:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | rskin72 wrote: | | "but paul can play te" |
Really? When's he gonna start showing it? |
 sometimes ... you crack me up |
|
| Back to top |
|
DaSkinz Baby
Hog
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 288
Location: Clarksburg
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 9:45 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | rskin72 wrote: | | but paul can play te |
Really? When's he gonna start showing it? |
Exactly Paul drops WAY TOO MANY BALLS and he was a receiver?? Whenever the ball is thrown to him I have a reasonable expectation he drops it. Sometimes I don't think Niles Paul could catch a cold...........  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14722
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:13 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SkinsJock wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | rskin72 wrote: | | "but paul can play te" |
Really? When's he gonna start showing it? |
sometimes ... you crack me up |
I aims to please. |
|
| Back to top |
|
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3207
|
| Posted: Wed Dec 19, 2012 10:20 am Post subject: |
|
|
| .. and Hank always almost drops it. He be the juggler. Likes to stumble too. Wuddup? |
|
| Back to top |
|
| Page 10 of 10 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
|
