Washington Redskins Message Board
Visit the THN Website 
Washington Redskins Fan Forum spacer Washington Redskins Message Board
Home Login Register Rules FAQ Photo Galleries Fri May 24, 2013 10:20 am
Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements.
   TheHogs.net Forum Index » Hog Wash - Washington Redskins Football

 » Brandon Banks - The Wide Receiver

All times are GMT - 5 Hours 
Post new topic   Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next  
Author Message
The Hogster
#######
#######


Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 7002
Location: Washington D.C.

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 2:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

You people don't know what you're talking about. If Banks "sucked" was "cooked" or couldn't "produce" Mike Shanahan would move on.

One thing Mike has shown the ability to is to admit a mistake and cut his losses. You people are not reasonable with your expectations for returners. Just because you see them as highlights every week, doesn't mean that the same guy does it every week.

If you do some simple research, you'll see that Devin Hester, the GOAT in terms of returns, has gone a span of 2 seasons without breaking one.

This is the same biased blather we hear in the offseason. How many times does Mike S have to tell you to chill out.

SMH
Back to top
riggofan
Hog


Joined: 13 Jan 2004
Posts: 2947
Location: Montclair, Virginia

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 3:03 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hogster wrote:
You people don't know what you're talking about. If Banks "sucked" was "cooked" or couldn't "produce" Mike Shanahan would move on.


Good grief you sure have a bone for Banks!!! hah.

I sort of agree with what you're saying though, Hogster. I don't know what Shanahan thinks of Banks. But if we had a better option available at that position, I'm sure he wouldn't hesitate to use it.
Back to top
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
DarthMonk


Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3206

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 3:35 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hogster wrote:
The same logic applies to Banks as Gano.


SMH
Back to top
Countertrey
the 'mudge
the 'mudge


Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 12769
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 6:26 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hogster wrote:
You people don't know what you're talking about. If Banks "sucked" was "cooked" or couldn't "produce" Mike Shanahan would move on.

One thing Mike has shown the ability to is to admit a mistake and cut his losses. You people are not reasonable with your expectations for returners. Just because you see them as highlights every week, doesn't mean that the same guy does it every week.

If you do some simple research, you'll see that Devin Hester, the GOAT in terms of returns, has gone a span of 2 seasons without breaking one.

This is the same biased blather we hear in the offseason. How many times does Mike S have to tell you to chill out.

SMH
... unless, of course, Banks continued presence is nothing more than Shanahan simply acknowledging that he's not going to improve the situation by moving on at this point in the season... there's simply not anyone out there that would offer any improvement in performance... so... no point in cutting now.

Banks appears to have gone the route of Antwan Randal-el... a master of indecision and bad decision, giving up any advantage that his speed gives him... . but... it's too late to change now.

And, regarding our "expectations for returners"... umm... we don't need him to "consistently break one". We just need him to be consistently effective. We recognize that when we see it.

B Mitch... D Green... M. Nelms. R. Cartright (much slower, but offered consistently solid field position)... our expectations are not excessive... But, we do know what a good returner looks like. SMH
Back to top
The Hogster
#######
#######


Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 7002
Location: Washington D.C.

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 9:45 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Countertrey wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
You people don't know what you're talking about. If Banks "sucked" was "cooked" or couldn't "produce" Mike Shanahan would move on.

One thing Mike has shown the ability to is to admit a mistake and cut his losses. You people are not reasonable with your expectations for returners. Just because you see them as highlights every week, doesn't mean that the same guy does it every week.

If you do some simple research, you'll see that Devin Hester, the GOAT in terms of returns, has gone a span of 2 seasons without breaking one.

This is the same biased blather we hear in the offseason. How many times does Mike S have to tell you to chill out.

SMH
... unless, of course, Banks continued presence is nothing more than Shanahan simply acknowledging that he's not going to improve the situation by moving on at this point in the season... there's simply not anyone out there that would offer any improvement in performance... so... no point in cutting now.

Banks appears to have gone the route of Antwan Randal-el... a master of indecision and bad decision, giving up any advantage that his speed gives him... . but... it's too late to change now.

And, regarding our "expectations for returners"... umm... we don't need him to "consistently break one". We just need him to be consistently effective. We recognize that when we see it.

B Mitch... D Green... M. Nelms. R. Cartright (much slower, but offered consistently solid field position)... our expectations are not excessive... But, we do know what a good returner looks like. SMH


Obviously not. B Mitch is HOF worthy. D Green is in the HOF and did it in spots. R Cartwright was a consistent KO returner when Kickoffs actually got returned.

The new rules change the game for KOs. As a punt returner, Banks has proven what he's capable of. He has shown it. Even still, you people hate on him during the season and in the offseason. It undermines your argument against him when it seems like you jump at the chance to want him gone.
Back to top
Link
522682_Modells.com! Your Online Store for Licensed Apparel!  Click Here!
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
DarthMonk


Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3206

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:22 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hogster wrote:
Countertrey wrote:
The Hogster wrote:
You people don't know what you're talking about. If Banks "sucked" was "cooked" or couldn't "produce" Mike Shanahan would move on.

One thing Mike has shown the ability to is to admit a mistake and cut his losses. You people are not reasonable with your expectations for returners. Just because you see them as highlights every week, doesn't mean that the same guy does it every week.

If you do some simple research, you'll see that Devin Hester, the GOAT in terms of returns, has gone a span of 2 seasons without breaking one.

This is the same biased blather we hear in the offseason. How many times does Mike S have to tell you to chill out.

SMH
... unless, of course, Banks continued presence is nothing more than Shanahan simply acknowledging that he's not going to improve the situation by moving on at this point in the season... there's simply not anyone out there that would offer any improvement in performance... so... no point in cutting now.

Banks appears to have gone the route of Antwan Randal-el... a master of indecision and bad decision, giving up any advantage that his speed gives him... . but... it's too late to change now.

And, regarding our "expectations for returners"... umm... we don't need him to "consistently break one". We just need him to be consistently effective. We recognize that when we see it.

B Mitch... D Green... M. Nelms. R. Cartright (much slower, but offered consistently solid field position)... our expectations are not excessive... But, we do know what a good returner looks like. SMH


Obviously not. B Mitch is HOF worthy. D Green is in the HOF and did it in spots. R Cartwright was a consistent KO returner when Kickoffs actually got returned.

The new rules change the game for KOs. As a punt returner, Banks has proven what he's capable of. He has shown it. Even still, you people hate on him during the season and in the offseason. It undermines your argument against him when it seems like you jump at the chance to want him gone.


I love him. I think he's been playing very poorly pretty much all season. He fumbles way too much. If he plays I hope he breaks one. I don't think he should be playing ... especially on kickoffs ... unless he can start making better decisions in the end zone.

He is not a good WR.
Back to top
ATX_Skins
ATX
ATX


Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 3322
Location: NOVA

Posted: Wed Dec 05, 2012 10:28 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Hate is a strong word.


I hate Brandon Banks.
Back to top
The Hogster
#######
#######


Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 7002
Location: Washington D.C.

Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 7:25 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For those with bias, hate, or memory loss.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=24iFIjs1Gxk
Back to top
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
DarthMonk


Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3206

Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 8:30 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

For those with unconditional hard-on:







Back to top
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ


Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11519
Location: New England

Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 8:44 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Brandon Banks has helped this team ..... in the past

I hope he can make some plays in the games coming up


I'm sure many here will agree that there is ZERO chance that Banks is playing here next season

I'll even add - Banks is not here next season, no matter what he does in the next 4 games

Banks has been a help but he's not getting a roster spot next season
Back to top
Link
THN's Redskins Fan Shop
DaSkinz Baby
Hog


Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 288
Location: Clarksburg

Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:27 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The Hogster wrote:
You people don't know what you're talking about. If Banks "sucked" was "cooked" or couldn't "produce" Mike Shanahan would move on.

One thing Mike has shown the ability to is to admit a mistake and cut his losses. You people are not reasonable with your expectations for returners. Just because you see them as highlights every week, doesn't mean that the same guy does it every week.

If you do some simple research, you'll see that Devin Hester, the GOAT in terms of returns, has gone a span of 2 seasons without breaking one.

This is the same biased blather we hear in the offseason. How many times does Mike S have to tell you to chill out.

SMH


Spot on, also people should ask what if we have better special teams. It's sort of hard to make any advances when you have NO BLOCKING. I bet you put Brandon Banks on the Jet's ST's and he is a beast. I am sure he is tired of getting crushed by bigger guys cause no one can block........
Back to top
FLWSkin
piggie


Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 189
Location: St. Robert, MO

Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:35 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

So when Robinson gets the ball and runs straight ahead and we get yards there is blocking. When Paul runs the ball straight ahead and gets yards there is blocking. When Banks gets the ball, dances around, runs sideways and gets tackled then there is no blocking. OK.
Back to top
The Hogster
#######
#######


Joined: 06 Mar 2005
Posts: 7002
Location: Washington D.C.

Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:36 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Right. But, of course folks who've never played the game will blame poor returns on the returner. Funny how the same people often bend over backwards to blame the blocking for Graham Gano's blocks/misses. But, if we can't get any positive returns, it's all Brandon's fault.

Totally ridiculous. Thank goodness, fans don't run or coach teams. Shanahan knows what he's doing. That's why Banks is our returner.

Quote:
Redskins Coach Mike Shanahan said the minimal returns aren’t entirely Banks’s fault. Instead, the coach says, there are a number of other factors to take into account.
“It all depends on the punts and the coverage,”




http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/football-insider/wp/2012/10/20/brandon-banks-still-waiting-for-breakout-in-returns-game/

Let's just be real. Ever since Banks got stabbed, people started treating him like a thug. There's no real basis for all of this hate every offseason and whenever he hasn't scored. If we had better options, he'd be gone. Period. Shanahan has proven that.
Back to top
SkinsJock
08 Champ
08 Champ


Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11519
Location: New England

Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:48 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

speaking for myself - Brandon Banks has been a help here ...

but that is over after this season - I do not mean that as a knock on what he's done - I just do not see him helping this team next season


there will be other players that are not a part of things here also - their ability to contribute is over
Back to top
FLWSkin
piggie


Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 189
Location: St. Robert, MO

Posted: Thu Dec 06, 2012 9:52 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I go by the eye test. Banks dances and does nothing. The other guys run straight ahead and get some yards. Kinda simple.
Back to top
Link
Kobo has over 2 million ebooks to choose from!
Page 5 of 10All times are GMT - 5 Hours
Post new topic   Reply to topic Goto page Previous  1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10  Next  



Home Login Register FAQ Search Photo Galleries Wireless Version
Copyright © 2000-2009 www.thehogs.net ( THN ). All Rights Reserved.Powered by php BB