| Author |
Message |
Bob 0119
The Punisher
Joined: 13 Sep 2007
Posts: 2571
Location: Manassas
|
| Posted: Fri Oct 05, 2012 9:31 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| Obamacare... |
|
| Back to top |
|
1niksder
**********
Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 16568
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 1:58 am Post subject: |
|
|
| fredp45 wrote: | | was it the signing of Ryan Grant maybe? |
Grant got 1 year $700,000 and had been accounted for.
I'll post in this thread where it went to when I find it |
|
| Back to top |
|
fredp45
Hog
Joined: 26 Dec 2004
Posts: 1769
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 3:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| No need to do a lot of work for me. Thanks |
|
| Back to top |
|
1niksder
**********
Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 16568
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
|
| Posted: Sat Oct 06, 2012 4:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Not work it's what we do for the site, got it all on one spreadsheet. So if you or any other member has a question, the answer can be found here if the question is asked.
Hope we helped.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Smithian
-----------
Joined: 04 Apr 2004
Posts: 2443
Location: Arkansas
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 8:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
People need to remember the cap hit when complaining about weaknesses in the secondary and offensive line.
This cap hit is extremely frustrating. Really set the Skins back quite a way when it comes building up this team. It forced Bruce Allen to throw together patchwork depth in a couple spots. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
skinsfan#33
#33
Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 3874
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 1niksder wrote: | | fredp45 wrote: | | was it the signing of Ryan Grant maybe? |
Grant got 1 year $700,000 and had been accounted for.
I'll post in this thread where it went to when I find it |
since he wasn't on the team for the first three games does that mean he earns 13/16th of the 700k or is that already adjusted for the partial season? |
|
| Back to top |
|
skinsfan#33
#33
Joined: 24 Jul 2004
Posts: 3874
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 10:08 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 1niksder wrote: | | fredp45 wrote: | | was it the signing of Ryan Grant maybe? |
Grant got 1 year $700,000 and had been accounted for.
I'll post in this thread where it went to when I find it |
since he wasn't on the team for the first three games does that mean he earns 13/16th of the 700k or is that already adjusted for the partial season? |
|
| Back to top |
|
1niksder
**********
Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 16568
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
|
| Posted: Sun Oct 07, 2012 11:06 am Post subject: |
|
|
| $18K was removed from his deal to account for the first 3 weeks |
|
| Back to top |
|
fredp45
Hog
Joined: 26 Dec 2004
Posts: 1769
|
| Posted: Fri Feb 22, 2013 6:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm back at this again......
...everything I read says we have to absorb an $18 mil cap hit this year, as if our unused 12 cap (say $3.5 mil) doesn't apply against the 13 cap. I thought the orginial ruling was $36 mil and we had to absorb AT LEAST 18 mil last year, which we did. I argue we absored $18 plus the $3.5 -- am I wrong about the wording of the ruling or on the numbers, anyone know for sure? |
|
| Back to top |
|
1niksder
**********
Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 16568
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| fredp45 wrote: | | I'm back at this again...... |
We're still here... 
| fredp45 wrote: | | ...everything I read says we have to absorb an $18 mil cap hit this year, as if our unused 12 cap (say $3.5 mil) doesn't apply against the 13 cap. I thought the orginial ruling was $36 mil and we had to absorb AT LEAST 18 mil last year, which we did. I argue we absored $18 plus the $3.5 -- am I wrong about the wording of the ruling or on the numbers, anyone know for sure? |
You're reading, poor writing...
The Redskins have to account for the remaining $18M from the $36M cap penalty and they HAD $4.27M in carryover space. So $13.73M has been removed from the projected cap figure of $121.1M giving the Redskins a adjusted Cap figure for 2013 of $107.37M. Same thing happened last year when the $120.6M cap was adjusted to $116.45M due to $13.59M in 2011 carryover space.
Carryover cap space will have accounted for $17.86M of the penalty when all is said and done.
UPDATE
With 56 players under contract here are the Redskins Cap numbers
2013 Salary Cap... $121,100,000
Carryover... $4,270,000
CapGate... -$18,000,000
Adjusted Cap Number ...$107,370,000
Cash Floor... $107,779,000
Cash to spend... $26,253,000
Rule Of 51,,, $106,001,750
2013 Dead Cap,,, $5,210,000
Cap Space Spent,,, $111,211,750
Space Available -$3,841,750
Last edited by 1niksder on Sat Feb 23, 2013 2:49 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
SkinsJock
08 Champ
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11504
Location: New England
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 7:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The $18M 'hit' hurts .. no question
The Redskins now have really good people making decisions that have this franchise in decent shape - the 'progress' towards a much better franchise continues |
|
| Back to top |
|
1niksder
**********
Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 16568
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
|
| Posted: Sat Feb 23, 2013 8:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SkinsJock wrote: | The $18M 'hit' hurts .. no question
The Redskins now have really good people making decisions that have this franchise in decent shape - the 'progress' towards a much better franchise continues |
In 2012 the Redskins had two players in the top five of highest paid salaries by position...
Trent Williams was number two among Tackles and D. Hall was number five among Cornerbacks.
Going into 2013 (after they re-work Hall's contract) the Redskins will be the only team with no players in the top nine at any position. 
They have come a long way... |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14695
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 1:28 am Post subject: |
|
|
| 1niksder wrote: | | SkinsJock wrote: | The $18M 'hit' hurts .. no question
The Redskins now have really good people making decisions that have this franchise in decent shape - the 'progress' towards a much better franchise continues |
In 2012 the Redskins had two players in the top five of highest paid salaries by position...
Trent Williams was number two among Tackles and D. Hall was number five among Cornerbacks.
Going into 2013 (after they re-work Hall's contract) the Redskins will be the only team with no players in the top nine at any position.
They have come a long way... |
What about Trent? How will he go from #2, to not top nine? |
|
| Back to top |
|
1niksder
**********
Joined: 27 Mar 2004
Posts: 16568
Location: If I knew ... it would explain a lot but I've seen Homerville on a map, that wasn't helpful at all
|
| Posted: Sun Feb 24, 2013 5:05 am Post subject: |
|
|
| His base salary will drop to $5M this season that's $6M less than what it was last season. |
|
| Back to top |
|
fredp45
Hog
Joined: 26 Dec 2004
Posts: 1769
|
| Posted: Mon Feb 25, 2013 10:27 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Thanks a lot for the clarification 1niksder, makes sense. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
| Page 2 of 8 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
