| Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements. |
| Author |
Message |
markshark84
Hog
Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 1460
Location: Houston, TX
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:39 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| SkinsJock wrote: | | 1niksder wrote: | | Any way you look at it 'the Danny" still is only one step away from the HC. Bruce needs to be the Prez of Football Ops, and he needs to hire a GM. That would put two people in between "the Danny" and HC |
THAT is a concern to me ...
I know that Mike is most likely here next season and so things are not likely to change at the top ...
give me Bruce Allen as President of Football Operations and Bill Polian as GM
- then I'd like to see Mike out as HC and for him to take Kyle with him ... |
If BA was given the title of "President of Football Operations" and named Bill Polian as GM --- wouldn't that go against MS's contract. Doesn't it stipulate in MS' contract that he has input on all "football decisions".
So if that were to happen, MS would be out of here that day ---- so you wouldn't be a "then". It would all happen concurrently. |
|
| Back to top |
|
emoses14
Hog
Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 1512
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 11:40 am Post subject: |
|
|
| markshark84 wrote: | | 1niksder wrote: | | Any way you look at it 'the Danny" still is only one step away from the HC. Bruce needs to be the Prez of Football Ops, and he needs to hire a GM. That would put two people in between "the Danny" and HC |
I would like that. Anything to get Danny further away from making football related decisions.
That said -- never gonna happen. Danny, being as narcastic as they come, couldn't do that to himself. |
Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB. |
|
| Back to top |
|
DaSkinz Baby
Hog
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 288
Location: Clarksburg
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 1:46 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| emoses14 wrote: | | markshark84 wrote: | | 1niksder wrote: | | Any way you look at it 'the Danny" still is only one step away from the HC. Bruce needs to be the Prez of Football Ops, and he needs to hire a GM. That would put two people in between "the Danny" and HC |
I would like that. Anything to get Danny further away from making football related decisions.
That said -- never gonna happen. Danny, being as narcastic as they come, couldn't do that to himself. |
Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB. |
Do we actually need any evidence. I think for the most part whether BA is MS boss or not, the arrogance of MS no way Bill Polian is brought in. The way Snyder is stuck on past I am shocked that Charlie Casserly hasn't been brought back as some type of consultant.......SMDH!!! |
|
| Back to top |
|
SkinsJock
08 Champ
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11532
Location: New England
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have seen nothing to indicate Snyder is involved with the managing of this franchise since Mike & Bruce took over
I have seen nothing to indicate that Mike Shanahan is NOT in charge of the FO
Due to the acquisition/trade that resulted in RG3 coming here - I think Mike is here for 1 more season at least ... unless there is a bad letdown here the next 6 games
Snyder will leave things the way they are ... for now
I'd love to have Bruce and Bill in charge of the FO here with a new HC but I doubt that happens |
|
| Back to top |
|
markshark84
Hog
Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 1460
Location: Houston, TX
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:22 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| emoses14 wrote: | | markshark84 wrote: | | 1niksder wrote: | | Any way you look at it 'the Danny" still is only one step away from the HC. Bruce needs to be the Prez of Football Ops, and he needs to hire a GM. That would put two people in between "the Danny" and HC |
I would like that. Anything to get Danny further away from making football related decisions.
That said -- never gonna happen. Danny, being as narcastic as they come, couldn't do that to himself. |
Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB. |
"Where is the evidence" is a defense most commonly used by guilty criminals........ |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
emoses14
Hog
Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 1512
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:44 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| markshark84 wrote: | | emoses14 wrote: | | markshark84 wrote: | | 1niksder wrote: | | Any way you look at it 'the Danny" still is only one step away from the HC. Bruce needs to be the Prez of Football Ops, and he needs to hire a GM. That would put two people in between "the Danny" and HC |
I would like that. Anything to get Danny further away from making football related decisions.
That said -- never gonna happen. Danny, being as narcastic as they come, couldn't do that to himself. |
Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB. |
"Where is the evidence" is a defense most commonly used by guilty criminals........ |
Um. . . "where is the evidence?" is the kind of THE question upon which punishment, rehabilitation, liability (for the most part) and obligation is founded in the law. Without evidence, well we're kind of just makin ish up as we go along, right? Its the starting point for a prosecution, a defense, and the trier of fact.
Put another way; if we don't have to come up with evidence to support the words coming out of our mouths and the positions we take aren't we really talking out of our  ? |
|
| Back to top |
|
markshark84
Hog
Joined: 14 Jul 2008
Posts: 1460
Location: Houston, TX
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 2:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| emoses14 wrote: | | markshark84 wrote: | | emoses14 wrote: | | markshark84 wrote: | | 1niksder wrote: | | Any way you look at it 'the Danny" still is only one step away from the HC. Bruce needs to be the Prez of Football Ops, and he needs to hire a GM. That would put two people in between "the Danny" and HC |
I would like that. Anything to get Danny further away from making football related decisions.
That said -- never gonna happen. Danny, being as narcastic as they come, couldn't do that to himself. |
Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB. |
"Where is the evidence" is a defense most commonly used by guilty criminals........ |
Um. . . "where is the evidence?" is the kind of THE question upon which punishment, rehabilitation, liability (for the most part) and obligation is founded in the law. Without evidence, well we're kind of just makin ish up as we go along, right? Its the starting point for a prosecution, a defense, and the trier of fact.
Put another way; if we don't have to come up with evidence to support the words coming out of our mouths and the positions we take aren't we really talking out of our ? |
Not sure you really caught what I was saying...... and I'm not going to get in an arguement over the evidentiary process in legal prosecutions --- since this is a REDSKINS forum.....
But "put another way", in my experience -- "where's the evidence" is typically used by guilty criminals that have disposed of it........  |
|
| Back to top |
|
DarthMonk
DarthMonk
Joined: 16 Nov 2005
Posts: 3238
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| markshark84 wrote: | | emoses14 wrote: | | markshark84 wrote: | | 1niksder wrote: | | Any way you look at it 'the Danny" still is only one step away from the HC. Bruce needs to be the Prez of Football Ops, and he needs to hire a GM. That would put two people in between "the Danny" and HC |
I would like that. Anything to get Danny further away from making football related decisions.
That said -- never gonna happen. Danny, being as narcastic as they come, couldn't do that to himself. |
Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB. |
"Where is the evidence" is a defense most commonly used by guilty criminals........ |
It also comes in handy when you're innocent:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xt05JcJ8Woo
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 10637
Location: on the bandwagon
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:20 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| markshark84 wrote: | | emoses14 wrote: | | Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB. |
"Where is the evidence" is a defense most commonly used by guilty criminals........ |
Guilt by association is an attack most commonly used by prosecutors without a case — but more importantly, it's fallacious.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
emoses14
Hog
Joined: 15 Jan 2007
Posts: 1512
Location: Atlanta, GA
|
| Posted: Mon Nov 19, 2012 3:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| markshark84 wrote: | | emoses14 wrote: | | markshark84 wrote: | | emoses14 wrote: | | markshark84 wrote: | | 1niksder wrote: | | Any way you look at it 'the Danny" still is only one step away from the HC. Bruce needs to be the Prez of Football Ops, and he needs to hire a GM. That would put two people in between "the Danny" and HC |
I would like that. Anything to get Danny further away from making football related decisions.
That said -- never gonna happen. Danny, being as narcastic as they come, couldn't do that to himself. |
Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB. |
"Where is the evidence" is a defense most commonly used by guilty criminals........ |
Um. . . "where is the evidence?" is the kind of THE question upon which punishment, rehabilitation, liability (for the most part) and obligation is founded in the law. Without evidence, well we're kind of just makin ish up as we go along, right? Its the starting point for a prosecution, a defense, and the trier of fact.
Put another way; if we don't have to come up with evidence to support the words coming out of our mouths and the positions we take aren't we really talking out of our ? |
Not sure you really caught what I was saying...... and I'm not going to get in an arguement over the evidentiary process in legal prosecutions --- since this is a REDSKINS forum.....
But "put another way", in my experience -- "where's the evidence" is typically used by guilty criminals that have disposed of it........ |
Oh. No, I didn't catch that. Not enough sleep. Fair enough. Nothing to see here, move along. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
DaSkinz Baby
Hog
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 288
Location: Clarksburg
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 9:25 am Post subject: |
|
|
| We all can speculate and discuss what we all feel we have seen and read regarding the front office or lack thereof depending on your point of view. However until we are a fly on the wall for a few days we all really don't know. We can only hope that Snyder finally get's it right..... |
|
| Back to top |
|
SkinsJock
08 Champ
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11532
Location: New England
|
| Posted: Tue Nov 20, 2012 11:57 am Post subject: |
|
|
there is proof that Snyder has not been involved with things to do with on the field activities
this franchise has a good QB (actually 2) & This franchise is getting better - If Snyder WERE involved that would not have happened  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Bishop Hammer
piggie
Joined: 04 Nov 2007
Posts: 105
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| emoses14 wrote: | | markshark84 wrote: | | emoses14 wrote: | | markshark84 wrote: | | emoses14 wrote: | | markshark84 wrote: | | 1niksder wrote: | | Any way you look at it 'the Danny" still is only one step away from the HC. Bruce needs to be the Prez of Football Ops, and he needs to hire a GM. That would put two people in between "the Danny" and HC |
I would like that. Anything to get Danny further away from making football related decisions.
That said -- never gonna happen. Danny, being as narcastic as they come, couldn't do that to himself. |
Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB. |
"Where is the evidence" is a defense most commonly used by guilty criminals........ |
Um. . . "where is the evidence?" is the kind of THE question upon which punishment, rehabilitation, liability (for the most part) and obligation is founded in the law. Without evidence, well we're kind of just makin ish up as we go along, right? Its the starting point for a prosecution, a defense, and the trier of fact.
Put another way; if we don't have to come up with evidence to support the words coming out of our mouths and the positions we take aren't we really talking out of our ? |
Not sure you really caught what I was saying...... and I'm not going to get in an arguement over the evidentiary process in legal prosecutions --- since this is a REDSKINS forum.....
But "put another way", in my experience -- "where's the evidence" is typically used by guilty criminals that have disposed of it........ |
Oh. No, I didn't catch that. Not enough sleep. Fair enough. Nothing to see here, move along. |
I have to agree. I've been one of the biggest Snyder bashers since he fired Marty. But I've seen no reason to think he's still been involved in the football operations.
Dans been doing what most of us fans have wanted: staying out of the way and letting people who know what they're doing do their jobs. Since he's been doing that I've let the past stay in past. He's made some mistakes but, as of right now, he's trying to atone for them and get the team back on track. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Bishop Hammer
piggie
Joined: 04 Nov 2007
Posts: 105
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 9:54 am Post subject: |
|
|
| emoses14 wrote: | | markshark84 wrote: | | emoses14 wrote: | | markshark84 wrote: | | emoses14 wrote: | | markshark84 wrote: | | 1niksder wrote: | | Any way you look at it 'the Danny" still is only one step away from the HC. Bruce needs to be the Prez of Football Ops, and he needs to hire a GM. That would put two people in between "the Danny" and HC |
I would like that. Anything to get Danny further away from making football related decisions.
That said -- never gonna happen. Danny, being as narcastic as they come, couldn't do that to himself. |
Do we have any actual evidence that he has had anything to do with football operations in the last 3 years to counter the evidence we have that he has not? w/r/t to that evidence, I've not seen him at a signing, heard about him in a negotiation or heard his name in the paper, period. In fact the only time i remember him doing anything in the last 3 years was going to meet RGIII at baylor. And that doesn't seem overly odd for your franchise QB. |
"Where is the evidence" is a defense most commonly used by guilty criminals........ |
Um. . . "where is the evidence?" is the kind of THE question upon which punishment, rehabilitation, liability (for the most part) and obligation is founded in the law. Without evidence, well we're kind of just makin ish up as we go along, right? Its the starting point for a prosecution, a defense, and the trier of fact.
Put another way; if we don't have to come up with evidence to support the words coming out of our mouths and the positions we take aren't we really talking out of our ? |
Not sure you really caught what I was saying...... and I'm not going to get in an arguement over the evidentiary process in legal prosecutions --- since this is a REDSKINS forum.....
But "put another way", in my experience -- "where's the evidence" is typically used by guilty criminals that have disposed of it........ |
Oh. No, I didn't catch that. Not enough sleep. Fair enough. Nothing to see here, move along. |
I have to agree. I've been one of the biggest Snyder bashers since he fired Marty. But I've seen no reason to think he's still been involved in the football operations.
Dans been doing what most of us fans have wanted: staying out of the way and letting people who know what they're doing do their jobs. Since he's been doing that I've let the past stay in past. He's made some mistakes but, as of right now, he's trying to atone for them and get the team back on track. |
|
| Back to top |
|
SkinsJock
08 Champ
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11532
Location: New England
|
| Posted: Fri Nov 23, 2012 10:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Snyder SUCKS - The Redskins are doing fine BECAUSE he's NOT involved ... that's a GOOD thing ...  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
| Page 19 of 19 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
|
