| Welcome to the home of some of the Washington Redskins' most ravenous fans. If this is your first visit, please read our rules and regulations. You must register before you can access all of the forums, and to use all the board's features and options; members also enjoy fewer advertisements. |
| Author |
Message |
DaSkinz Baby
Hog
Joined: 24 Sep 2012
Posts: 287
Location: Clarksburg
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:29 am Post subject: Re: Garcon back, Banks should be benched, Cooley needs touch |
 |
|
| fleetus wrote: | Now that Garcon is back in the starting lineup, I hope we can end those completely ineffective plays where Banks shifts to the backfield. Has Banks made it past the line of scrimmage once?
I'm also tired of seeing Banks making poor KR/PR decisions, including running the PR out of the end zone this week and being stuffed inside the 10. These poor decisions plus his fumbles have far outweighed the few returns he has broken for significant yardage.
Nothing against Paulsen but I'd like to see Cooley get a few touches. He's made some nice blocks, but with his hands I would think he'd be a great outlet receiver for RG3. |
As slow as Cooley is now, what makes you think he is a better option than Paulsen?? You do realize that Paulsen is bigger, faster and stronger than Cooley right? I think we should let Cooley go, he has done nothing to warrant playing time and is still SLOW AS MOLASSES GOING UP HILL IN DECEMBER......Captain Chaos is long dead......... |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14716
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:05 am Post subject: Re: Garcon back, Banks should be benched, Cooley needs touch |
|
|
| DaSkinz Baby wrote: | | fleetus wrote: | Now that Garcon is back in the starting lineup, I hope we can end those completely ineffective plays where Banks shifts to the backfield. Has Banks made it past the line of scrimmage once?
I'm also tired of seeing Banks making poor KR/PR decisions, including running the PR out of the end zone this week and being stuffed inside the 10. These poor decisions plus his fumbles have far outweighed the few returns he has broken for significant yardage.
Nothing against Paulsen but I'd like to see Cooley get a few touches. He's made some nice blocks, but with his hands I would think he'd be a great outlet receiver for RG3. |
As slow as Cooley is now, what makes you think he is a better option than Paulsen?? You do realize that Paulsen is bigger, faster and stronger than Cooley right? I think we should let Cooley go, he has done nothing to warrant playing time and is still SLOW AS MOLASSES GOING UP HILL IN DECEMBER......Captain Chaos is long dead......... |
God, I'm glad you aren't part of the FO. This franchise owes CC a debt, and I would keep him on the team the rest of the year, regardless. BTW, have you ever seen Paul or Paulsen attemp to block? TEs have to do that sometimes.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
ATX_Skins
ATX
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 3322
Location: NOVA
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:10 am Post subject: Re: Garcon back, Banks should be benched, Cooley needs touch |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | DaSkinz Baby wrote: | | fleetus wrote: | Now that Garcon is back in the starting lineup, I hope we can end those completely ineffective plays where Banks shifts to the backfield. Has Banks made it past the line of scrimmage once?
I'm also tired of seeing Banks making poor KR/PR decisions, including running the PR out of the end zone this week and being stuffed inside the 10. These poor decisions plus his fumbles have far outweighed the few returns he has broken for significant yardage.
Nothing against Paulsen but I'd like to see Cooley get a few touches. He's made some nice blocks, but with his hands I would think he'd be a great outlet receiver for RG3. |
As slow as Cooley is now, what makes you think he is a better option than Paulsen?? You do realize that Paulsen is bigger, faster and stronger than Cooley right? I think we should let Cooley go, he has done nothing to warrant playing time and is still SLOW AS MOLASSES GOING UP HILL IN DECEMBER......Captain Chaos is long dead......... |
God, I'm glad you aren't part of the FO. This franchise owes CC a debt, and I would keep him on the team the rest of the year, regardless. BTW, have you ever seen Paul or Paulsen attemp to block? TEs have to do that sometimes. |
I think it's safe to say all of our TE's have blocking issues or we'd be seeing Cooley more often. |
|
| Back to top |
|
FLWSkin
piggie
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 189
Location: St. Robert, MO
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Being in the front office in the NFL is sometimes a very cut throat business. We don't "owe" Colley anything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14716
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 11:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| FLWSkin wrote: | | Being in the front office in the NFL is sometimes a very cut throat business. We don't "owe" Colley anything. |
I agree with you on that, but we do owe Cooley a chance to be part of our SuperBowl run.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
SkinsJock
08 Champ
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11514
Location: New England
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 8:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | FLWSkin wrote: | | Being in the front office in the NFL is sometimes a very cut throat business. We don't "owe" Colley anything. |
I agree with you on that, but we do owe Cooley a chance to be part of our SuperBowl run. |
AND - I'm not sure how having Cooley on the roster is hurting us for the rest of this season
Cooley has earned a rep for being a clutch player and he plays every down with desire - we should be so lucky |
|
| Back to top |
|
Countertrey
the 'mudge
Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 12768
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
... and, if you don't mind...
Can the injury bug please move along to some other... deserving... locus?
Thank you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Irn-Bru
FanFromAnnapolis
Joined: 20 Mar 2004
Posts: 10627
Location: on the bandwagon
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Countertrey wrote: | ... and, if you don't mind...
Can the injury bug please move along to some other... deserving... locus?
Thank you. |
Well, it's been hitting Pittsburgh and Philly pretty hard this year. I'd say that's a good start.
Maybe we gave it to them . . . |
|
| Back to top |
|
FLWSkin
piggie
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 189
Location: St. Robert, MO
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 9:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SkinsJock wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | FLWSkin wrote: | | Being in the front office in the NFL is sometimes a very cut throat business. We don't "owe" Colley anything. |
I agree with you on that, but we do owe Cooley a chance to be part of our SuperBowl run. |
AND - I'm not sure how having Cooley on the roster is hurting us for the rest of this season
Cooley has earned a rep for being a clutch player and he plays every down with desire - we should be so lucky |
On the flip side, I don't see how having Cooley on the roster is helping us at this point either. |
|
| Back to top |
|
yupchagee
#14
Joined: 19 Apr 2006
Posts: 4110
Location: Louisville KY
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 28, 2012 10:30 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| FLWSkin wrote: | | SkinsJock wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | FLWSkin wrote: | | Being in the front office in the NFL is sometimes a very cut throat business. We don't "owe" Colley anything. |
I agree with you on that, but we do owe Cooley a chance to be part of our SuperBowl run. |
AND - I'm not sure how having Cooley on the roster is hurting us for the rest of this season
Cooley has earned a rep for being a clutch player and he plays every down with desire - we should be so lucky |
On the flip side, I don't see how having Cooley on the roster is helping us at this point either. |
It makes sense to have a 3rd TE on roster. Who would you prefer? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
 |
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14716
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:02 am Post subject: |
|
|
| SkinsJock wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | FLWSkin wrote: | | Being in the front office in the NFL is sometimes a very cut throat business. We don't "owe" Colley anything. |
I agree with you on that, but we do owe Cooley a chance to be part of our SuperBowl run. |
AND - I'm not sure how having Cooley on the roster is hurting us for the rest of this season
Cooley has earned a rep for being a clutch player and he plays every down with desire - we should be so lucky |
And he's a core Redskin, unlike this Colley guy FLWSkin says we don't owe anything. |
|
| Back to top |
|
FLWSkin
piggie
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 189
Location: St. Robert, MO
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | SkinsJock wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | FLWSkin wrote: | | Being in the front office in the NFL is sometimes a very cut throat business. We don't "owe" Colley anything. |
I agree with you on that, but we do owe Cooley a chance to be part of our SuperBowl run. |
AND - I'm not sure how having Cooley on the roster is hurting us for the rest of this season
Cooley has earned a rep for being a clutch player and he plays every down with desire - we should be so lucky |
And he's a core Redskin, unlike this Colley guy FLWSkin says we don't owe anything. |
Sorry if my mistyping of a letter upset you. I have just never felt players are "owed" anything. They are very well overpaid for their services. It doesn't matter if he is a so-called "core Redskin", if he can't play anymore, which it is obvious Cooley can't, then he shouldn't be on the team. Now I get that he is here because he knows the system and that is about the only reason. I also know the only reason he is on the team is because Davis is hurt. Riggo was a core Redskin too and he was cut. So were all of them. That is the nature of the game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
FLWSkin
piggie
Joined: 24 Nov 2012
Posts: 189
Location: St. Robert, MO
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:34 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | SkinsJock wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | FLWSkin wrote: | | Being in the front office in the NFL is sometimes a very cut throat business. We don't "owe" Colley anything. |
I agree with you on that, but we do owe Cooley a chance to be part of our SuperBowl run. |
AND - I'm not sure how having Cooley on the roster is hurting us for the rest of this season
Cooley has earned a rep for being a clutch player and he plays every down with desire - we should be so lucky |
And he's a core Redskin, unlike this Colley guy FLWSkin says we don't owe anything. |
Sorry if my mistyping of a letter upset you. I have just never felt players are "owed" anything. They are very well overpaid for their services. It doesn't matter if he is a so-called "core Redskin", if he can't play anymore, which it is obvious Cooley can't, then he shouldn't be on the team. Now I get that he is here because he knows the system and that is about the only reason. I also know the only reason he is on the team is because Davis is hurt. Riggo was a core Redskin too and he was cut. So were all of them. That is the nature of the game. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14716
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 8:48 am Post subject: |
|
|
| FLWSkin wrote: | | Sorry if my mistyping of a letter upset you. |
Yes, I am incredibly upset by your lack of typing skill. I might just quit this board, and never come back.
| FLWSkin wrote: | | It doesn't matter if he is a so-called "core Redskin", if he can't play anymore, which it is obvious Cooley can't, then he shouldn't be on the team. Now I get that he is here because he knows the system and that is about the only reason. I also know the only reason he is on the team is because Davis is hurt. |
I don't think that's as obvious as you do, since he's currently on the team. And another reason he is on the team, is because he refused to play anywhere else. It doesn't get more core than that. So, obviously (to me and the team, anyway) it does matter. |
|
| Back to top |
|
ATX_Skins
ATX
Joined: 29 Oct 2008
Posts: 3322
Location: NOVA
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 29, 2012 2:13 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | FLWSkin wrote: | | Sorry if my mistyping of a letter upset you. |
Yes, I am incredibly upset by your lack of typing skill. I might just quit this board, and never come back.
| FLWSkin wrote: | | It doesn't matter if he is a so-called "core Redskin", if he can't play anymore, which it is obvious Cooley can't, then he shouldn't be on the team. Now I get that he is here because he knows the system and that is about the only reason. I also know the only reason he is on the team is because Davis is hurt. |
I don't think that's as obvious as you do, since he's currently on the team. And another reason he is on the team, is because he refused to play anywhere else. It doesn't get more core than that. So, obviously (to me and the team, anyway) it does matter. |
What teams did he refuse to play for? |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
| Page 2 of 6 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
|
