| Author |
Message |
Quackjack
piglet
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 43
Location: Vienna, Virginia
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 4:29 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
| The Hogster wrote: | | DOGSRBACK wrote: | OK, I do not think the players on the Browns are going to be pumped up because you drafted RG3. Players do not think that way.
First I want to say I am a HUGE RG3 fan!!! If he does not play you will lose the game.
If he does play its going to be a great game, of course me being a homer I think the Browns win this game.
Yes we are 5-8, but we are 5-3 last 8 games. With Joe Haden playing we are 5-2 and with Big Phil Taylor playing we are 3-0...
You will have problems with Josh Gordon we is Nasty
TRICH is a stud, but he does not break big runs. He knows where the End Zone is with 9 TDs
Our Oline is nasty, wuold be shocked if you got to Weeden.
The fact is this will be a great game if RG3 plays, he is amazing and makes all those free agent wide outs you signed even better.
27-20 Browns..I know Homer pick, and I am sure you all will blast me and say stupid *sh$t* BLAH BLAH......
Should be a great game!!!! |
This must be what we sounded like when we sucked. Dude, ya'll will lose this game whether RG plays or not.
We are the better team. Better rookie RB, Better rookie QB, better coached. Just better. Phil Taylor will be a non factor versus the zone scheme. |
Better offense sure, better defense? Eh, it's equal. |
|
| Back to top |
|
SkinsJock
08 Champ
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11532
Location: New England
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 5:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I have nothing against the Browns or Brandon Weeden - I hope they do well
win or lose this Sunday - I think that most football fans would agree, we're a lot closer to getting to the big dance than the Browns
mostly because we have RG3 - that's just a fact
The Browns have a good group to build around but ...
having a QB like RG3 has a huge effect across the board in building a team like we are going through here |
|
| Back to top |
|
DOGSRBACK
newbie
Joined: 10 Dec 2012
Posts: 15
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quackjack 8 turnovers SHHHHHH this is a chat between teams that take care of the football and dont have a rapiest as a QB |
|
| Back to top |
|
Quackjack
piglet
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 43
Location: Vienna, Virginia
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 7:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DOGSRBACK wrote: | | Quackjack 8 turnovers SHHHHHH this is a chat between teams that take care of the football and dont have a rapiest as a QB |
Yes, I am sure we don't have rapiest as a quarterback. Take care of the football? Geez, 6 rings sure came outta nowhere. Shut up Browns fan, and go buy a Weeden jersey before he retires in a few years. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Countertrey
the 'mudge
Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 12783
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quackjack wrote: | | DOGSRBACK wrote: | | Quackjack 8 turnovers SHHHHHH this is a chat between teams that take care of the football and dont have a rapiest as a QB |
Yes, I am sure we don't have rapiest as a quarterback. Take care of the football? Geez, 6 rings sure came outta nowhere. Shut up Browns fan, and go buy a Weeden jersey before he retires in a few years. |
Rapiest: A user of a rapier.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
 |
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14754
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Countertrey wrote: | | Quackjack wrote: | | DOGSRBACK wrote: | | Quackjack 8 turnovers SHHHHHH this is a chat between teams that take care of the football and dont have a rapiest as a QB |
Yes, I am sure we don't have rapiest as a quarterback. Take care of the football? Geez, 6 rings sure came outta nowhere. Shut up Browns fan, and go buy a Weeden jersey before he retires in a few years. |
Rapiest: A user of a rapier.
|
Knowbody uses that term.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Countertrey
the 'mudge
Joined: 09 Jan 2004
Posts: 12783
Location: Curmudgeon Corner, Maine
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | Countertrey wrote: | | Quackjack wrote: | | DOGSRBACK wrote: | | Quackjack 8 turnovers SHHHHHH this is a chat between teams that take care of the football and dont have a rapiest as a QB |
Yes, I am sure we don't have rapiest as a quarterback. Take care of the football? Geez, 6 rings sure came outta nowhere. Shut up Browns fan, and go buy a Weeden jersey before he retires in a few years. |
Rapiest: A user of a rapier.
|
Knowbody uses that term. |
Of course they do... I took it directly from the "Unabridged Metallica Dictionary of Archaic Anglo/Celtic Terminlogy". Have you never listened to "Whiskey in the Jar"? My God, man. |
|
| Back to top |
|
Deadskins
JSPB22
Joined: 02 Jul 2004
Posts: 14754
Location: Location, LOCATION!
|
| Posted: Thu Dec 13, 2012 9:03 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Countertrey wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | Countertrey wrote: | | Quackjack wrote: | | DOGSRBACK wrote: | | Quackjack 8 turnovers SHHHHHH this is a chat between teams that take care of the football and dont have a rapiest as a QB |
Yes, I am sure we don't have rapiest as a quarterback. Take care of the football? Geez, 6 rings sure came outta nowhere. Shut up Browns fan, and go buy a Weeden jersey before he retires in a few years. |
Rapiest: A user of a rapier.
|
Knowbody uses that term. |
Of course they do... I took it directly from the "Unabridged Metallica Dictionary of Archaic Anglo/Celtic Terminlogy". Have you never listened to "Whiskey in the Jar"? My God, man. |
Know, I think you miss understood my point. Knowbody in there rite mined wood ever call Big Been a rapiest.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
Quackjack
piglet
Joined: 12 Dec 2012
Posts: 43
Location: Vienna, Virginia
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 5:24 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Deadskins wrote: | | Countertrey wrote: | | Deadskins wrote: | | Countertrey wrote: | | Quackjack wrote: | | DOGSRBACK wrote: | | Quackjack 8 turnovers SHHHHHH this is a chat between teams that take care of the football and dont have a rapiest as a QB |
Yes, I am sure we don't have rapiest as a quarterback. Take care of the football? Geez, 6 rings sure came outta nowhere. Shut up Browns fan, and go buy a Weeden jersey before he retires in a few years. |
Rapiest: A user of a rapier.
|
Knowbody uses that term. |
Of course they do... I took it directly from the "Unabridged Metallica Dictionary of Archaic Anglo/Celtic Terminlogy". Have you never listened to "Whiskey in the Jar"? My God, man. |
Know, I think you miss understood my point. Knowbody in there rite mined wood ever call Big Been a rapiest. |
Big Bean is such a sharp gentlemen, no? |
|
| Back to top |
|
SkinsJock
08 Champ
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11532
Location: New England
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 11:56 am Post subject: Re: If cousins starts vs browns: We will lose |
|
|
| funsho2 wrote: | | Cousins is not RG3....RG3 have not turn over the ball like luck this year thats one of the thing that makes him special....kirk will turn the ball over vs a great browns defense.....and we will lose at a critical time....michael jordan played while he was sick....if rg3 can go lets go....these are critical games....if we win out we will win either the division or a wild card spot |
You're wrong on a number of things here ... 
the Redskins will not lose this game 'because' of the play of the QB - either QB can win this game
RG3 will play if he's able to and it looks as though that is the case - NOT because we cannot win with Kirk as QB
nothing is guaranteed if we win out except that we will have clearly demonstrated that this franchise is going to be VERY competitive again
and
it's been a VERY successful season
btw - you are correct - Cousins is not RG3 |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
|
|
grampi
Hog
Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Posts: 1504
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 1:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| DOGSRBACK wrote: | | Guess what the Redskins would be without RG3 and you are blind to think other wise. |
What would the Pats be without Brady? What would the Broncos be without Manning? What would the Giants be without the other Manning? What would the Packers be without Rodgers? It's much more interesting for the reader if you have a point.... |
|
| Back to top |
|
Redskin in Canada
~~~~~~
Joined: 08 Apr 2004
Posts: 10286
Location: Canada
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| grampi wrote: | | DOGSRBACK wrote: | | Guess what the Redskins would be without RG3 and you are blind to think other wise. |
What would the Pats be without Brady? What would the Broncos be without Manning? What would the Giants be without the other Manning? What would the Packers be without Rodgers? It's much more interesting for the reader if you have a point.... |
What would the Browns be without Weeden?
The Browns. 
No difference.  |
|
| Back to top |
|
grampi
Hog
Joined: 20 Sep 2007
Posts: 1504
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 2:51 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Redskin in Canada wrote: | | grampi wrote: | | DOGSRBACK wrote: | | Guess what the Redskins would be without RG3 and you are blind to think other wise. |
What would the Pats be without Brady? What would the Broncos be without Manning? What would the Giants be without the other Manning? What would the Packers be without Rodgers? It's much more interesting for the reader if you have a point.... |
What would the Browns be without Weeden?
The Browns.
No difference. |
Lol! |
|
| Back to top |
|
die cowboys die
Hog
Joined: 27 Aug 2004
Posts: 2130
Location: Boston, MA
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:26 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm having trouble understanding where the perception of the Browns as having a stout defense is coming from. They are 23rd in yards allowed, giving up only 25 fewer yards per game than our mostly awful defense.
I also have trouble taking their "hot streak" to mean anything, seeing as they beat the Steelers sans Cheeselessburger (and they didn't even play well with him back last week), and then literally the two worst teams in the league back to back (Raiders and Chiefs).
Am i missing something?  |
|
| Back to top |
|
SkinsJock
08 Champ
Joined: 24 Feb 2004
Posts: 11532
Location: New England
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 14, 2012 3:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
it's like this dcd - we're dealing with a poor Browns fan and he's all puffed up about his team and ...
well .. we're trying to play nice, you see ..... and he's getting all pissed off because I think he sees the writing on the wall
no worries |
|
| Back to top |
|
Link
|
 |
| Page 7 of 11 | All times are GMT - 5 Hours |
